Literature DB >> 27239066

Senology in Gynaecology Specialist Training: a Baseline Survey from 2014.

J Puppe1, M Dieterich2, C Bayer3, J Neiman4, M de Sousa Mendes5, P Gaß3, J Lermann3, S Schott6.   

Abstract

Introduction: Qualified training in senology is essential for maintaining adequate, high quality patient care. In order to meet the needs of doctors in training and those of the medical infrastructure it is necessary to assess the quality of training regularly, to enable its adaption and optimisation.
Methods: We developed a comprehensive, 10 item online questionnaire to assess the quality of specialised training in senology. This questionnaire was sent to 4000 speciality trainees and young specialists countrywide via the DGGG newsletter and was accessible for over four weeks.
Results: 111 obstetrics and gynaecology speciality trainees participated in this national survey, 79 % of whom were female. 33 % of participants were working at university hospitals, 29 % at hospitals offering maximal level care without an associated medical faculty, 37 % at hospitals offering primary and secondary level care and 2 % at gynaecology practices. 25 % of participants could imagine working in the field of senology in future. On average the current perception of general specialist training was satisfactory. Specialist trainees at university hospitals rated training in senology highest (score: 2.95) compared to those at other hospitals. A fixed rotation through a breast centre offering comprehensive advanced training was seen as a potential improvement to senology training. Conclusions: This is the first survey of specialised training in senology to be conducted in Germany. Results showed that there is significant potential for young doctors to enter the speciality in future. There are also significant differences in the perceived quality of senology training between training facilities. This survey aimed to determine the quality of specialised training at senology centres and hopes to contribute to a sustainable improvement in training. The intention is to continue to make senology attractive to gynaecologists and to ensure well-grounded training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DGGG Young Forum; gynaecology; speciality training; training in senology

Year:  2016        PMID: 27239066      PMCID: PMC4873295          DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-104055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  5 in total

1.  Does practice make perfect? Resident experience with breast surgery influences excision adequacy.

Authors:  Jennifer K Plichta; Claudia B Perez; Elizabeth He; Alexi Bloom; Gerard J Abood; Constantine Godellas
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  "Pregnant and Operating": Evaluation of a Germany-wide Survey Among Female Gynaecologists and Surgeons.

Authors:  C Knieper; B Ramsauer; K Hancke; A Woeckel; L Ismail; A Bühren; B Toth
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  The effect of an evidence-based medicine curriculum on breast cancer knowledge and satisfaction of surgical residents.

Authors:  Ian K Komenaka; Meredith A Heberer; Patrick J O'Neill; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Elizabeth M Nesset; Ross F Goldberg; Lisa M Winton; Marcia E Bouton; Daniel M Caruso
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  Residents' Experience in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  R Gregory Conway; Edmund K Bartlett; Rebecca L Hoffman; Brian J Czerniecki; Giorgos C Karakousis; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.891

5.  Male and Female Physicians in Hospital Gynaecology Departments - Analysis of the Impact of "Feminisation" from the Viewpoint of Medical Directors.

Authors:  T Riepen; V Möbus; U Kullmer; H R Tinneberg; K Münstedt
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.915

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Duty Rosters and Workloads of Obstetricians in Germany: Results of a Germany-wide Survey.

Authors:  Johannes Neimann; Julia Knabl; Julian Puppe; Christian Michael Bayer; Paul Gass; Lena Gabriel; Birgit Seelbach-Goebel; Johannes Lermann; Sarah Schott
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.915

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.