J E Machado-Alba1, A F Ruiz2, M E Machado-Duque3. 1. Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira-Audifarma S.A. Pereira, Pereira, Colombia. 2. Farmacoeconomía-Audifarma S.A. Bogotá, Pereira, Colombia. 3. Grupo de Investigación en Farmacoepidemiología y Farmacovigilancia, Facultad Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Pereira, Colombia.
Abstract
AIMS: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease cause of disability and high costs. To determine the effectiveness of therapy with biologic- and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with RA and factors associated with the control of the disease. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of RA patients receiving treatment with DMARDs in a rheumatologic healthcare institution in five Colombian cities from December 2009 to August 2013. The effectiveness was assessed by Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28) and a lower value of 2.6 was considered remission. RESULTS: A total of 827 patients were studied for an average observation period of 17.3 ± 11.0 months, with mean age 54.3 ± 13.1 years. The most frequently used DMARDs were methotrexate, leflunomide and chloroquine. The most frequently used biological DMARDs were etanercept and abatacept. Initially, 17.8% of the patients received some biological DMARDs in comparison with 28.7% at the end of the observation period. A median DAS28 of 3.5 was found, which was reduced by the end of the observation period to 2.8 (p < 0.001), and cases of patients who were in remission increased from 30.1% to 42.9%. Treatment with leflunomide (OR: 0.47; CI 95%: 0.35-0.64, p < 0.001) or rituximab (OR: 0.37; CI 95%: 0.17-0.83, p = 0.016) was associated with a lesser probability of reaching remission. To be treated in the city of Manizales (OR: 2.56; CI 95%: 1.36-4.82, p = 0.004) was associated with a high probability of remission. CONCLUSIONS: Biological and DMARDs therapy for RA was effective in a relevant proportion of Colombian patients as a consequence of management with strategies set on remission aims quantified using DAS28. Cost-effectiveness of the therapy must be evaluated.
AIMS: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease cause of disability and high costs. To determine the effectiveness of therapy with biologic- and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in patients with RA and factors associated with the control of the disease. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of RApatients receiving treatment with DMARDs in a rheumatologic healthcare institution in five Colombian cities from December 2009 to August 2013. The effectiveness was assessed by Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28) and a lower value of 2.6 was considered remission. RESULTS: A total of 827 patients were studied for an average observation period of 17.3 ± 11.0 months, with mean age 54.3 ± 13.1 years. The most frequently used DMARDs were methotrexate, leflunomide and chloroquine. The most frequently used biological DMARDs were etanercept and abatacept. Initially, 17.8% of the patients received some biological DMARDs in comparison with 28.7% at the end of the observation period. A median DAS28 of 3.5 was found, which was reduced by the end of the observation period to 2.8 (p < 0.001), and cases of patients who were in remission increased from 30.1% to 42.9%. Treatment with leflunomide (OR: 0.47; CI 95%: 0.35-0.64, p < 0.001) or rituximab (OR: 0.37; CI 95%: 0.17-0.83, p = 0.016) was associated with a lesser probability of reaching remission. To be treated in the city of Manizales (OR: 2.56; CI 95%: 1.36-4.82, p = 0.004) was associated with a high probability of remission. CONCLUSIONS: Biological and DMARDs therapy for RA was effective in a relevant proportion of Colombian patients as a consequence of management with strategies set on remission aims quantified using DAS28. Cost-effectiveness of the therapy must be evaluated.
Authors: Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba; Manuel E Machado-Duque; Andres Gaviria-Mendoza; Juan Manuel Reyes; Natalia Castaño Gamboa Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Pedro Santos-Moreno; Nelson J Alvis-Zakzuk; Laura Villarreal-Peralta; Maria Carrasquilla-Sotomayor; Fernando de la Hoz-Restrepo; Nelson Alvis-Guzmán Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2021-06-23