Literature DB >> 27238963

Efficacy and safety of fulranumab as monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe, chronic knee pain of primary osteoarthritis: a randomised, placebo- and active-controlled trial.

A J Mayorga1, S Wang1, K M Kelly1, J Thipphawong2.   

Abstract

AIMS: The efficacy and safety of monotherapy with fulranumab, a monoclonal antibody that neutralises human nerve growth factor (NGF), was evaluated compared with placebo and an active comparator, controlled-release (CR) oxycodone, in patients with moderate to severe chronic knee pain of primary osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS: In this phase-2, double-blind (DB), double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled study, patients (40-80 years) were randomised (1:1:1:1) to placebo, fulranumab 3 or 9mg every 4 weeks (Q4 wk), or oxycodone CR twice-daily. Primary efficacy end-point: responder rates based on percent improvement in average osteoarthritis-related pain intensity (OAPI) scores from baseline to week-12 or when Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put a clinical hold on all anti-NGF trials, whichever was earlier. Secondary efficacy end-points: average OAPI score (week-16), Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index Global Score and subscales (pain, physical function, stiffness), and Patient Global Assessment.
RESULTS: As of an FDA clinical hold on all anti-NGF trials, only 196/300 patients were randomised and 33% (65/196) had completed 12 weeks of the 16-week DB phase. Responders were patients who did not withdraw and whose pain improved. Responder rates were not significantly different between fulranumab treatment groups (3mgQ4wk: 71%, p = 0.739; 9mgQ4wk: 80%, p = 0.843) and placebo (77%), whereas, oxycodone CR (56%) had significantly lower responder rates in comparison to both fulranumab (3mgQ4wk: p = 0.008; 9mgQ4wk: p = 0.012) and placebo (p = 0.0021). Secondary efficacy results were consistent with primary. None of the joint replacements (four in three patients) were adjudicated as rapidly progressing OA/osteonecrosis.
CONCLUSION: Low sample size because of early termination make interpretation of this study difficult, but fulranumab monotherapy resulted in significantly better pain relief and function compared with oxycodone CR (but not against placebo) and was generally well-tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01094262.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27238963     DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.12807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract        ISSN: 1368-5031            Impact factor:   2.503


  13 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of nerve growth factor inhibition in clinical medicine.

Authors:  Barton L Wise; Matthias F Seidel; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 2.  Nerve growth factor blockade for the management of osteoarthritis pain: what can we learn from clinical trials and preclinical models?

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Joel A Block; Anne-Marie Malfait
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Downregulation of microRNA-9 increases matrix metalloproteinase-13 expression levels and facilitates osteoarthritis onset.

Authors:  Hongxin Zhang; Bo Song; Zhaoxun Pan
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 4.  Nerve growth factor antibody for the treatment of osteoarthritis pain and chronic low-back pain: mechanism of action in the context of efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Martin Schmelz; Patrick Mantyh; Anne-Marie Malfait; John Farrar; Tony Yaksh; Leslie Tive; Lars Viktrup
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Targeting nerve growth factor, a new option for treatment of osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of comparative efficacy and safety with traditional drugs.

Authors:  Ziqin Cao; Jian Zhou; Zeling Long; Yihan Li; Jingjing Sun; Yingquan Luo; Wanchun Wang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.682

Review 6.  Disease-modifying therapeutic strategies in osteoarthritis: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Yongsik Cho; Sumin Jeong; Hyeonkyeong Kim; Donghyun Kang; Jeeyeon Lee; Seung-Baik Kang; Jin-Hong Kim
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 8.718

7.  Efficacy and safety of biologic agents for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials.

Authors:  Fanqiang Meng; Hui Li; Haoran Feng; Huizhong Long; Zidan Yang; Jiatian Li; Yuqing Wang; Dongxing Xie
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 8.  Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Nerve Growth Factor Antibody Therapy for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yijie Gao; Zhengxu Hu; Yi Huang; Weijian Liu; Changle Ren
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-25

9.  An update on targets for treating osteoarthritis pain: NGF and TRPV1.

Authors:  Alia M Obeidat; Anita Donner; Rachel E Miller
Journal:  Curr Treatm Opt Rheumatol       Date:  2020-05-06

10.  The Efficacy of Nerve Growth Factor Antibody for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis Pain and Chronic Low-Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Si Yang; Yu Huang; Ziqi Ye; Lu Li; Yu Zhang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.