Literature DB >> 27238553

Early Patient Access to Medicines: Health Technology Assessment Bodies Need to Catch Up with New Marketing Authorization Methods.

Lada Leyens1, Angela Brand.   

Abstract

National and international medicines agencies have developed innovative methods to expedite promising new medicines to the market and facilitate early patient access. Some of these approval pathways are the conditional approval and the adaptive pathways by the European Medicines Agency (EMA); the Promising Innovative Medicine (PIM) designation and the Early Access to Medicines Scheme (EAMS) by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), as well as the Fast Track, Breakthrough or Accelerated Approval methods by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, at least in Europe, these methods cannot achieve the goal of improving timely access for patients to new medicines on their own; the reimbursement process also has to become adaptive and flexible. In the past 2 years, the effective access (national patient access) to newly approved oncology drugs ranged from 1 to 30 months, with an extremely high variability between European countries. The goal of early patient access in Europe can only be achieved if the national health technology assessment bodies, such as NICE (ENG), HAS (FR), G-BA (DE) or AIFA (IT), provide harmonized, transparent, flexible, conditional and adaptive methods that adopt the level of evidence accepted by the medicines agencies. The efforts from medicines agencies are welcome but will be in vain if health technology assessments do not follow with similar initiatives, and the European 'postcode' lottery will continue.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27238553      PMCID: PMC5296921          DOI: 10.1159/000446537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  5 in total

1.  Available Tools to Facilitate Early Patient Access to Medicines in the EU and the USA: Analysis of Conditional Approvals and the Implications for Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Lada Leyens; Étienne Richer; Øyvind Melien; Wolfgang Ballensiefen; Angela Brand
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  Spending on new drug development1.

Authors:  Christopher Paul Adams; Van Vu Brantner
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 3.  Early market access of cancer drugs in the EU.

Authors:  J Martinalbo; D Bowen; J Camarero; M Chapelin; P Démolis; P Foggi; B Jonsson; J Llinares; A Moreau; D O'Connor; J Oliveira; S Vamvakas; F Pignatti
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Improving the contribution of regulatory assessment reports to health technology assessments--a collaboration between the European Medicines Agency and the European network for Health Technology Assessment.

Authors:  Michael Berntgen; Anne Gourvil; Mira Pavlovic; Wim Goettsch; Hans-Georg Eichler; Finn Børlum Kristensen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.725

5.  Application of clinical trial simulation to compare proof-of-concept study designs for drugs with a slow onset of effect; an example in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Peter Lockwood; Wayne Ewy; David Hermann; Nick Holford
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 4.200

  5 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Challenges and new frontiers in analytical characterization of antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Anil Wagh; Hangtian Song; Ming Zeng; Li Tao; Tapan K Das
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  How do we avoid disaster when exiting the European Medicines Agency? Making the most of Brexit in pharmaceutical regulation.

Authors:  Anthony James Hatswell
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-06-27

3.  First-in-Human, Healthy Volunteers Integrated Protocol of ETC-206, an Oral Mnk 1/2 Kinase Inhibitor Oncology Drug.

Authors:  Vincenzo Teneggi; Veronica Novotny-Diermayr; Lay Hoon Lee; Maryam Yasin; Pauline Yeo; Kantharaj Ethirajulu; Sylvia Bong Hwa Gan; Stephanie E Blanchard; Ranjani Nellore; Dhananjay N Umrani; Roberto Gomeni; Darren Lim Wan Teck; Greg Li; Qing Shu Lu; Yang Cao; Alex Matter
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.689

4.  Real World Data in Health Technology Assessment of Complex Health Technologies.

Authors:  Milou A Hogervorst; Johan Pontén; Rick A Vreman; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Wim G Goettsch
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Comparison of post-authorisation measures from regulatory authorities with additional evidence requirements from the HTA body in Germany - are additional data requirements by the Federal Joint Committee justified?

Authors:  Jörg Ruof; Thomas Staab; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Jakob Schröter; Friedrich Wilhelm Schwartz
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.