Literature DB >> 27238084

Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian cancer improves complete cytoreduction and survival - A population-based cohort study.

Pernilla Dahm-Kähler1, Charlotte Palmqvist2, Christian Staf3, Erik Holmberg4, Liza Johannesson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate centralized primary care of advanced ovarian and fallopian tube cancers in a complete population cohort in relation to complete cytoreduction, time interval from surgery to chemotherapy and relative survival.
METHODS: A regional population-based cohort study of women diagnosed with primary ovarian and fallopian tube cancers and included in the Swedish Quality Registry (SQR) during 2008-2013 in a region where primary care of advanced stages was centralized in 2011. Surgical, oncological characteristics, outcomes, follow-ups and relative survivals were analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 817 women diagnosed with ovarian and fallopian tube cancers during 2008-2013 and 523 were classified as FIGO stage III-IV and further analyzed. Primary debulking surgery (PDS) was performed in 81% and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) in 11%. Complete cytoreduction at PDS was performed in 37% before compared to 49% after centralization (p<0.03). The chemotherapy protocols were identical in the cohorts and they received and completed the planned chemotherapy equally. The time interval between PDS and chemotherapy was 36days (median) before compared to 24days after centralization (p<0.01). The relative 3-year survival rate in women treated by PDS was 44% compared to 65% after centralization and the estimated excess mortality rate ratio (EMRR) was reduced (RR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.79). Comparing the complete cohorts before and after centralization, regardless primary treatment, the relative 3-year survival rate increased from 40% to 61% with reduced EMRR (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.45-0.76).
CONCLUSION: Centralized primary care of advanced ovarian and fallopian tube cancers increases complete cytoreduction, decreases time interval from PDS to chemotherapy and improves relative survival significantly.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centralization; Cytoreduction; Debulking surgery; Ovarian cancer; Surgery; Survival outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27238084     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

1.  Potential Consequences of Minimum-Volume Standards for Hospitals Treating Women With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Alexander Melamed; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Quality Indicators and Survival Outcome in Stage IIIB-IVB Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated at a Single Institution.

Authors:  Inga Steinberga; Kjell Jansson; Bengt Sorbe
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 3.  Novel Surgical Strategies in the Treatment of Gynecological Malignancies.

Authors:  Martina Aida Angeles; Carlos Martínez-Gómez; Federico Migliorelli; Marie Voglimacci; Justine Figurelli; Stephanie Motton; Yann Tanguy Le Gac; Gwénaël Ferron; Alejandra Martinez
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09

4.  Trends and factors associated with radical cytoreductive surgery in the United States: A case for centralized care.

Authors:  A K Sinno; X Li; R E Thompson; E J Tanner; K L Levinson; R L Stone; S M Temkin; A N Fader; D S Chi; K Long Roche
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.

Authors:  Jennifer Bergstrom; Alessia Aloisi; Shannon Armbruster; Ting-Tai Yen; Jvan Casarin; Mario M Leitao; Edward J Tanner; Rayna Matsuno; Karime Kalil Machado; Sean C Dowdy; Pamela T Soliman; Stephanie L Wethington; Rebecca L Stone; Kimberly L Levinson; Amanda N Fader
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Treatment Outcomes of Early Carcinoma Cervix Before and After Sub-specialization.

Authors:  Vinotha Thomas; Rachel G Chandy; Ajit Sebastian; Anitha Thomas; Dhanya S Thomas; Thomas S Ram; Abraham Peedicayil
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 7.  Variations in gynecologic oncology training in low (LIC) and middle income (MIC) countries (LMICs): Common efforts and challenges.

Authors:  Carolyn Johnston; Joseph S Ng; Ranjit Manchanda; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Linus Chuang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-01-09

8.  Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.

Authors:  Borut Kobal; Marco Noventa; Branko Cvjeticanin; Matija Barbic; Leon Meglic; Marusa Herzog; Giulia Bordi; Amerigo Vitagliano; Carlo Saccardi; Erik Skof
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Rural disparities in surgical care from gynecologic oncologists among Midwestern ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Kristin Weeks; Charles F Lynch; Michele West; Ryan Carnahan; Michael O'Rorke; Jacob Oleson; Megan McDonald; Sherri L Stewart; Mary Charlton
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Evidence-based improvisation: Facing the challenges of cervical cancer care in Uganda.

Authors:  Megan Swanson; Stefanie Ueda; Lee-May Chen; Megan J Huchko; Carol Nakisige; Jane Namugga
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-01-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.