Literature DB >> 27237043

Sex differences in age-related changes on peripheral warm and cold innocuous thermal sensitivity.

Yoshimitsu Inoue1, Nicola Gerrett2, Tomoko Ichinose-Kuwahara3, Yasue Umino3, Saeko Kiuchi3, Tatsuro Amano4, Hiroyuki Ueda5, George Havenith6, Narihiko Kondo7.   

Abstract

Cutaneous thermal sensitivity to a warm and cold stimulus was compared amongst 12 older (OF, 65.2±1.0year) and 29 younger (YF, 21.6±0.2years) female participants, and 17 older (OM, 66.2±1.5years) and 13 younger (YM, 21.2±0.4years) male participants to examine the effects of ageing and sex. In a neutral condition (27.5°C, 50% RH) during rest, warm and cold thermal sensitivity was measured on eight body regions (forehead, chest, back, forearm, hand, thigh, calf, and foot). Using the method of limits, a thermal stimulator was applied to the skin at an adapting temperature and either increased or decreased at a constant rate (0.3°C/s) until the participants detected the temperature with a push button. Thermal sensitivity declined with ageing to both a cold (older: 1468.6±744.7W/m(2), younger: 869.8±654.7W/m(2), p<0.001) and warm (older: 2127.0±1208.3W/m(2), younger: 1301.7±1055.2W/m(2), p<0.001) innocuous stimulus. YF and OF were more sensitive than YM and OM to both a warm and cold stimulus (p<0.05). There was no interaction between age and sex suggesting that whilst thermal sensitivity decreases with age the decrease is similar between the sexes (p>0.05). There was an interaction between temperatures, age and location and it seemed that cold thermal sensitivity was more homogenous for young and older participants however warm thermal sensitivity was more heterogeneous especially in the younger participants (p<0.05). Although the pattern was not similar between ages or sexes it was evident that the forehead was the most sensitive region to a warm and cold stimulus. Interestingly the decline in sensitivity observed with ageing occurred for all locations but was attenuated at the forehead in both males and females (p>0.05).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing; Regional differences; Sex; Temperature; Thermal sensitivity

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27237043     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.05.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

Review 1.  Human temperature regulation under heat stress in health, disease, and injury.

Authors:  Matthew N Cramer; Daniel Gagnon; Orlando Laitano; Craig G Crandall
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 46.500

Review 2.  Individual Responses to Heat Stress: Implications for Hyperthermia and Physical Work Capacity.

Authors:  Josh Foster; Simon G Hodder; Alex B Lloyd; George Havenith
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Certain personal and environmental factors as predictors of thermal sensation perceived by a population of students in a university setting from Timisoara, Romania: a case study.

Authors:  Cristina I Petrescu
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Determination of car seat contact area for personalised thermal sensation modelling.

Authors:  Miloš Fojtlín; Agnes Psikuta; Róbert Toma; Jan Fišer; Miroslav Jícha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Relationship between Perceived Indoor Temperature and Self-Reported Risk for Frailty among Community-Dwelling Older People.

Authors:  Yukie Nakajima; Steven M Schmidt; Agneta Malmgren Fänge; Mari Ono; Toshiharu Ikaga
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Differential Cutaneous Thermal Sensitivity in Humans: Method of Limit vs. Method of Sensation Magnitude.

Authors:  Yongsuk Seo; Jung-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  A review of Japanese-style bathing: its demerits and merits.

Authors:  Yutaka Tochihara
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.867

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.