Literature DB >> 27236754

Molecular typing and differences in biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibilities among Prototheca strains isolated in Italy and Brazil.

S Morandi1, P Cremonesi2, E Capra2, T Silvetti3, M Decimo3, V Bianchini4, A C Alves5, A C Vargas6, G M Costa7, M G Ribeiro5, M Brasca3.   

Abstract

Bovine mastitis caused by Prototheca is a serious and complex problem that accounts for high economic losses in the dairy industry. The main objective of this study was to identify and characterize at genetic level different Prototheca strains and provide the most complete data about protothecal antibiotic resistance. The study involves 46 isolates from Italian (13 strains) and Brazilian (33 strains) mastitic milk. These strains were identified by multiplex PCR and single strand conformation polymorphism analysis and characterized by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR. Moreover, biofilm production and antibiotic susceptibility were evaluated. Forty-two strains resulted as Prototheca zopfii genotype 2, whereas 4 isolates could belong to a potential new Prototheca species. The RAPD-PCR, performed with 3 primers (M13, OPA-4, and OPA-18), showed a notable heterogeneity among isolates and grouped the strains according to the species and geographical origin. Biofilm production was species-dependent and P. zopfii genotype 2 strains were classified as strong biofilm producers. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility tests indicated that Prototheca strains were susceptible to antibacterial drugs belonging to aminoglycosides group; the highest activity against Prototheca strains was observed in the case of colistin sulfate, gentamicin, and netilmicin (100% of susceptible strains). It is interesting to note that all the Italian P. zopfii genotype 2 strains showed lower minimum inhibitory concentration values than the Brazilian ones. Nisin showed more efficacy than lysozyme and potassium sorbate, inhibiting 31% of the strains. Results obtained in this study confirmed that RAPD-PCR is a rapid, inexpensive, and highly discriminating tool for Prototheca strains characterization and could give a good scientific contribution for better understanding the protothecal mastitis in dairy herd.
Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Prototheca; antibiotic susceptibility; biofilm production; netilmicin; randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27236754     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-10900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  5 in total

1.  Preliminary Results, Perspectives, and Proposal for a Screening Method of In Vitro Susceptibility of Prototheca Species to Antimicrotubular Agents.

Authors:  Laura Morello; Tommaso Tiroli; Francesca Aretino; Stefano Morandi; Diego Breviario
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  A Case of Prototheca zopfii Genotype 1 Infection in a Dog (Canis lupus familiaris).

Authors:  Caroline S Silveira; Deborah Cesar; M Kelly Keating; Marlene DeLeon-Carnes; Aníbal G Armién; Martín Luhers; Franklin Riet-Correa; Federico Giannitti
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Prototheca zopfii Induced Ultrastructural Features Associated with Apoptosis in Bovine Mammary Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Muhammad Shahid; Jianfang Wang; Xiaolong Gu; Wei Chen; Tariq Ali; Jian Gao; Dandan Han; Rui Yang; Séamus Fanning; Bo Han
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.293

Review 4.  Now for something completely different: Prototheca, pathogenic algae.

Authors:  Christopher D Shave; Linda Millyard; Robin C May
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Prototheca spp. induce an inflammatory response via mtROS-mediated activation of NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome pathways in bovine mammary epithelial cell cultures.

Authors:  Wenpeng Zhao; Fumeng He; Herman W Barkema; Siyu Xu; Jian Gao; Gang Liu; Zhaoju Deng; Muhammad Shahid; Yuxiang Shi; John P Kastelic; Bo Han
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.683

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.