Literature DB >> 27236602

A randomized, single-blind, prospective trial comparing three different gonadotropin doses with or without addition of letrozole during ovulation stimulation in patients with poor ovarian response.

Ercan Bastu1, Faruk Buyru2, Mehmet Ozsurmeli2, Irem Demiral2, Murat Dogan2, John Yeh3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to investigate whether IVF outcomes would differ between patients with POR who received three different gonadotropin doses with or without the addition of letrozole during ovulation stimulation. STUDY
DESIGN: Only those who fulfilled two of the three Bologna criteria were included to the study. 95 patients met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study. In the first group, 31 patients were treated with 450IU gonadotropins. In the second group, 31 patients were treated with 300IU gonadotropins. The third group comprised 33 patients and was treated with 150IU gonadotropins in combination with letrozole.
RESULTS: The results indicate that differences in doses of hMG and rFSH in patients with POR result in a similar number of retrieved MII and fertilized oocytes, similar fertilization rates, number of transferred embryos, implantation, cancelation, chemical, clinical, and ongoing pregnancy rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the dose of gonadotropins during ovulation stimulation is an intuitively appealing approach when the patient is a poor responder. However, increasing the dose does not necessarily improve the reproductive outcome. Using a mild stimulation with addition of letrozole was as effective as stimulation with higher doses of gonadotropins alone in this patient population.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gonadotropins; Letrozole; Ovulation stimulation; Poor ovarian response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27236602     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  13 in total

1.  Embryo Banking with Mild Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: An Alternative Strategy for Poor Prognosis Patients.

Authors:  Ivan Sini; Arie A Polim; Nining Handayani; Adinda Pratiwi; Rosalina Thuffi; Nuraeni Yusup; Arief Boediono
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

2.  Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzolino; Gustavo Nardini Cecchino; Ernesto Bosch; Juan Antonio Garcia-Velasco; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.357

3.  Effect of adding letrozole to gonadotropin on in vitro fertilization outcomes: An RCT.

Authors:  Maryam Eftekhar; Lida Saeed
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  Letrozole as co-treatment agent in ovarian stimulation antagonist protocol in poor responders: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Ashraf Moini; Zohreh Lavasani; Ladan Kashani; Maryam Farid Mojtahedi; Nazila Yamini
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2019-09-22

5.  Accumulation of embryos over 3 natural modified IVF (ICSI) cycles followed by transfer to improve the outcome of poor responders.

Authors:  A K Datta; S Campbell; N Felix; G Nargund
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2019-03

Review 6.  Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

Authors:  Sarah F Lensen; Jack Wilkinson; Jori A Leijdekkers; Antonio La Marca; Ben Willem J Mol; Jane Marjoribanks; Helen Torrance; Frank J Broekmans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Does daily co administration of gonadotropins and letrozole during the ovarian stimulation improve IVF outcome for poor and sub optimal responders?

Authors:  Moran Shapira; Raoul Orvieto; Oshrit Lebovitz; Ravit Nahum; Adva Aizer; Aliza Segev-Zahav; Jigal Haas
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  Individualized ovarian stimulation in IVF/ICSI treatment: it is time to stop using high FSH doses in predicted low responders.

Authors:  Jori A Leijdekkers; Helen L Torrance; Nienke E Schouten; Theodora C van Tilborg; Simone C Oudshoorn; Ben Willem J Mol; Marinus J C Eijkemans; Frank J M Broekmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  The Conundrum of Poor Ovarian Response: From Diagnosis to Treatment.

Authors:  Polina Giannelou; Mara Simopoulou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Evangelos Makrakis; Adamantia Kontogeorgi; Agni Pantou; Dionysios Galatis; Theodoros Kalampokas; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-11

10.  Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Montoya-Botero; Panagiotis Drakopoulos; Iñaki González-Foruria; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.