Literature DB >> 2723595

Visit frequency for essential hypertension: observed associations.

M J Lichtenstein1, M A Steele, T P Hoehn, C J Bulpitt, E C Coles.   

Abstract

Data from the British Department of Health and Social Services Hypertension Care Computing Project were analyzed to study determinants of visit frequency in hypertension management. The 457 patients from five general practices made 7974 visits between 1971 and 1985 resulting in 7391 intervals on which evaluation could be based. The mean interval between visits was 113 days (SD = 110 days) with a median interval of 91 days. Visit interval was influenced by level of blood pressure and length of time in follow-up. For diastolic pressures less than 104 mmHg the mean visit interval was 4 months, contrasting with 2 months for diastolic pressures greater than 130 mmHg. Visit intervals became longer with increasing length of time in follow-up, independent of level of blood pressure. Shorter intervals reflected initial management and getting the blood pressure reduced; longer intervals may reflect patients' failure to keep scheduled appointments. Between practices, mean visit intervals ranged from 99 to 193 days (median 72 to 164 days). These differences were reduced after adjustment for length of time the patients had been in follow-up. Patient age, sex, body mass index, and the presence of angina pectoris were not associated with visit interval. The analyses illustrate how process and outcome may be linked in ambulatory care practice as a means of determining rational guidelines for optimal utilization of health services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2723595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  8 in total

1.  The role of patients and providers in the timing of follow-up visits. Telephone Care Study Group.

Authors:  H G Welch; M K Chapko; K E James; L M Schwartz; S Woloshin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Encounter frequency and blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Alexander Turchin; Saveli I Goldberg; Maria Shubina; Jonathan S Einbinder; Paul R Conlin
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  A computerized intervention to improve timing of outpatient follow-up: a multicenter randomized trial in patients treated with warfarin. National Consortium of Anticoagulation Clinics.

Authors:  S D Fihn; M B McDonell; D Vermes; J G Henikoff; D C Martin; C M Callahan; D L Kent; R H White
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Randomised equivalence trial comparing three month and six month follow up of patients with hypertension by family practitioners.

Authors:  Richard V Birtwhistle; Marshall S Godwin; M Dianne Delva; R Ian Casson; Miu Lam; Susan E MacDonald; Rachelle Seguin; Lucia Rühland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-15

5.  Setting the revisit interval in primary care.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; J H Wasson; R A Renfrew; H G Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Rethinking the frequency of between-visit monitoring for patients with diabetes.

Authors:  John D Piette; James E Aikens; Ann M Rosland; Jeremy B Sussman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Visit frequency and hypertension.

Authors:  Richard Guthmann; Nancy Davis; Matthew Brown; Jose Elizondo
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Optimal systolic blood pressure target, time to intensification, and time to follow-up in treatment of hypertension: population based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Wenxin Xu; Saveli I Goldberg; Maria Shubina; Alexander Turchin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.