Literature DB >> 27235909

Cost-Effectiveness of Old and New Technologies for Aneuploidy Screening.

Rachel G Sinkey1, Anthony O Odibo2.   

Abstract

Cost-effectiveness analyses allow assessment of whether marginal gains from new technology are worth increased costs. Several studies have examined cost-effectiveness of Down syndrome (DS) screening and found it to be cost-effective. Noninvasive prenatal screening also appears to be cost-effective among high-risk women with respect to DS screening, but not for the general population. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a genetic sequencing method superior to but more expensive than karyotype. In light of CMAs greater ability to detect genetic abnormalities, it is cost-effective when used for prenatal diagnosis of an anomalous fetus. This article covers methodology and salient issues of cost-effectiveness.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost-benefit analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Down syndrome; Economics; Noninvasive prenatal screening; Prenatal diagnosis–economics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235909     DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lab Med        ISSN: 0272-2712            Impact factor:   1.935


  1 in total

1.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by circulating fetal nucleated red blood cells and extravillous trophoblasts using silicon-based nanostructured microfluidics.

Authors:  Chung-Er Huang; Gwo-Chin Ma; Hei-Jen Jou; Wen-Hsiang Lin; Dong-Jay Lee; Yi-Shing Lin; Norman A Ginsberg; Hsin-Fu Chen; Frank Mau-Chung Chang; Ming Chen
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.