| Literature DB >> 27235909 |
Rachel G Sinkey1, Anthony O Odibo2.
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analyses allow assessment of whether marginal gains from new technology are worth increased costs. Several studies have examined cost-effectiveness of Down syndrome (DS) screening and found it to be cost-effective. Noninvasive prenatal screening also appears to be cost-effective among high-risk women with respect to DS screening, but not for the general population. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is a genetic sequencing method superior to but more expensive than karyotype. In light of CMAs greater ability to detect genetic abnormalities, it is cost-effective when used for prenatal diagnosis of an anomalous fetus. This article covers methodology and salient issues of cost-effectiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; Cost-effectiveness analysis; Down syndrome; Economics; Noninvasive prenatal screening; Prenatal diagnosis–economics
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27235909 DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2016.01.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Lab Med ISSN: 0272-2712 Impact factor: 1.935