Literature DB >> 27235776

3D analysis is superior to 2D analysis for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in revealing vascularity in focal liver lesions - A retrospective analysis of 83 cases.

Fa-Jin Dong1, Jin-Feng Xu2, Dong Du3, Yang Jiao1, Lei Zhang1, Min Li4, Hui-Yu Liu1, Yi Xiong1, Hui Luo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether dynamic 3D contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is superior to 2D imaging in revealing vascularization of focal liver lesions (FLLs).
METHODS: Dynamic 2D and 3D CEUS were used to assess the vascularity of FLLs in 83 patients. The two analyses were carried out sequentially following a bolus intravenous injection of SonoVue contrast agent, one injection of 1.5-2mL was given for each part of the study (one for the 2D and another for the 3D). Due to the large data volume for 3D analysis, only the arterial phase (20-25s) was recorded and analyzed. The data were analyzed by two independent analysts.
RESULTS: The current study included a total of 83 patients with FLL. The diagnosis was established based on histopathology, Computed Tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Among the 83 cases, 61 were hepatocellular carcinomas (include 10 metastasis, 51 HCCs), and the remaining 22 were benign lesions: hemangiomas (n=15), focal nodular hyperplasias (n=4), and inflammatory lesions (n=3). The overall analysis showed similar patterns of enhancement between the 2D and 3D CEUS in the following features: morphological characteristics, and spatial relationships. In comparison to 2D imaging, 3D CEUS reveal more details of the boundary and feeding arteries of the lesions, as well as distorted features of supply vessels of hepatocellular carcinomas.
CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic 3D-CEUS is superior to 2D-CEUS in displaying the spatial relationship of FLLs and their vascularity patterns, and simultaneous imaging of FLL perfusion and anatomic features.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Focal liver lesion; Microbubble contrast media; Three-dimensional imaging; Two-dimensional imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235776     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  9 in total

1.  Application of real-time three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue for the evaluation of focal liver lesions: a prospective single-center study.

Authors:  Ying Lu; Baoxian Liu; Yanling Zheng; Jia Luo; Xiaoer Zhang; Guangliang Huang; Xiaohua Xie; Jieyi Ye; Wei Wang; Xusheng Liu; Xiaoyan Xie
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (D-CEUS) for the early prediction of bevacizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Michele Amadori; Domenico Barone; Emanuela Scarpi; Devil Oboldi; Elena Amadori; Gianfranco Bandi; Alice Rossi; Fabio Ferroni; Angela Ragazzini; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Giovanni Luca Frassineti; Giampaolo Gavelli; Alessandro Passardi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  How to perform Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Christoph F Dietrich; Michalakis Averkiou; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Richard G Barr; Peter N Burns; Fabrizio Calliada; Vito Cantisani; Byung Choi; Maria C Chammas; Dirk-André Clevert; Michel Claudon; Jean-Michel Correas; Xin-Wu Cui; David Cosgrove; Mirko D'Onofrio; Yi Dong; JohnR Eisenbrey; Teresa Fontanilla; Odd Helge Gilja; Andre Ignee; Christian Jenssen; Yuko Kono; Masatoshi Kudo; Nathalie Lassau; Andrej Lyshchik; Maria Franca Meloni; Fuminori Moriyasu; Christian Nolsøe; Fabio Piscaglia; Maija Radzina; Adrian Saftoiu; Paul S Sidhu; Ioan Sporea; Dagmar Schreiber-Dietrich; Claude B Sirlin; Maria Stanczak; Hans-Peter Weskott; Stephanie R Wilson; Juergen Karl Willmann; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyun-Jung Jang; Alexandar Vezeridis; Sue Westerway
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2018-02-07

4.  Comparison of Real-Time Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Quantify Flow in an In Vitro Model: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Si-Min Ruan; Qiao Zheng; Zhu Wang; Hang-Tong Hu; Li-Da Chen; Huan-Ling Guo; Xiao-Yan Xie; Ming-De Lu; Wei Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-12-27

5.  Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography to Color Doppler Ultrasound in Evaluation of Carotid Body Tumors.

Authors:  Guangchao Gu; Xiaoyan Zhang; Junyue Shen; Shayan Gulidanna; Qiong Gao; Jiang Shao; Bao Liu; Bo Zhang; Yuehong Zheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Quantification of intranodal vascularity by computer pixel-counting method enhances the accuracy of ultrasound in distinguishing metastatic and tuberculous cervical lymph nodes.

Authors:  Sammy C H Cheng; Anil T Ahuja; Michael Ying
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2019-11

7.  Quantitative Three-Dimensional Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: First-In-Human Pilot Study in Patients with Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Ahmed El Kaffas; Rosa Maria Silveira Sigrist; George Fisher; Sunitha Bachawal; Joy Liau; Huaijun Wang; Alexander Karanany; Isabelle Durot; Jarrett Rosenberg; Dimitre Hristov; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Dynamic Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Predict Therapeutic Response of Radiofrequency Ablation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  Jiaying Cao; Yi Dong; Feng Mao; Wenping Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-26       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound for focal liver lesions: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meijng Qu; Zhaohua Jia; Lipeng Sun; Hui Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.