Literature DB >> 27235518

Porous tantalum uncemented acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty: a minimum ten-year clinical, radiological and quality of life outcome study.

S Konan1, C P Duncan1, B A Masri1, D S Garbuz1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Reconstruction of the acetabulum after failed total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a surgical challenge in the presence of severe bone loss. We report the long-term survival of a porous tantalum revision acetabular component, its radiological appearance and quality of life outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the results of 46 patients who had undergone revision of a failed acetabular component with a Paprosky II or III bone defect and reconstruction with a hemispherical, tantalum acetabular component, supplementary screws and a cemented polyethylene liner.
RESULTS: After a minimum follow-up of ten years (ten to 12), the survivorship of the porous tantalum acetabular component was 96%, with further revision of the acetabular component as the end point. The ten-year survivorship, with hip revision for any reason as the end point, was 92%. We noted excellent pain relief (mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score pain 92.6, (40 to 100)) and good functional outcomes (mean WOMAC function 90.3 (30.9 to 100), mean University of California Los Angeles activity scale 5 (2 to 10)) and generic quality of life measures (mean Short Form-12 (SF-12) physical component 48.3 (18.1 to 56.8), mean SF-12 mental component 56.7 (32.9 to 70.3)). Patient satisfaction with pain relief, function and return to recreational activities were excellent. TAKE HOME MESSAGE: Uncemented acetabular reconstruction using a tantalum acetabular component gives excellent clinical and quality of life outcomes at a minimum follow-up of ten years. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:767-71. ©2016 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular revision outcomes; Revision shell; Trabecular metal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235518     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.37183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  16 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Do Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Rerevision After Revision THA Performed for Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Study Using the NJR Data Set.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Andrew Judge; David W Murray; Hemant G Pandit
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  An alternative treatment option for Paprosky Type IIIb acetabular defect using multiple tantalum wedges - A case report.

Authors:  Markus Rossmann; Christian Ansorge; Christian Lausmann; Eduardo M Suero; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-25

Review 4.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of a Novel 3D-printed Fully Porous Titanium Acetabular Shell in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elyse J Berlinberg; J Abraham Kavian; Mackenzie A Roof; Ittai Shichman; Brett Frykberg; William B Lutes; Erik A Schnaser; Stephen A Jones; Richard W McCalden; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-10-12

6.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Irene Isabel López-Torres; Pablo Sanz-Ruíz; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Ricardo Andrade-Albarracín; Javier Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?

Authors:  Anders Brüggemann; Erik Fredlund; Hans Mallmin; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Outcomes following revision surgery performed for adverse reactions to metal debris in non-metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients: Analysis of 185 revisions from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  G S Matharu; A Judge; D W Murray; H G Pandit
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  Do dual-mobility cups cemented into porous tantalum shells reduce the risk of dislocation after revision surgery?

Authors:  Anders Brüggemann; Hans Mallmin; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Radiolucencies surrounding acetabular components with three-dimensional coatings: artifact or real?

Authors:  Ahmad Faizan; Philip Chuang; Carlos Aponte; Vincent Moretti; Peter F Sharkey
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.