Literature DB >> 27235317

Should a Portable Ventilator Be Used in All In-Hospital Transports?

Steven R Holets1, John D Davies2.   

Abstract

Movement of the mechanically ventilated patient may be for a routine procedure or medical emergency. The risks of transport seem manageable, but the memory of a respiratory-related catastrophe still gives many practitioners pause. The risk/benefit ratio of transport must be assessed before movement. During transport of the ventilated patients, should we always use a transport ventilator? What is the risk of using manual ventilation? How are PEEP and FIO2 altered? Is there an impact on the ability to trigger during manual ventilation? Is hyperventilation and hypoventilation a common problem? Does hyperventilation or hypoventilation result in complications? Are portable ventilators worth the cost? What about the function of portable ventilators? Can these devices faithfully reproduce ICU ventilator function? The following pro and con discussion will attempt to address many of these issues by reviewing the current evidence on transport ventilation.
Copyright © 2016 by Daedalus Enterprises.

Entities:  

Keywords:  manual resuscitator; manual ventilation; portable ventilator; transport ventilator

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235317     DOI: 10.4187/respcare.04745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Care        ISSN: 0020-1324            Impact factor:   2.258


  2 in total

Review 1.  Invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Başak Bayram; Emre Şancı
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-29

2.  Efficacy and Complications of Life-Control Portable Resuscitator for Transport of In-Hospital Patients.

Authors:  Mustafa Ahmet Afacan; Mehmet Özgür Erdogan; Abdullah Algın; Miraç Kırcı; Sahin Colak
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 1.112

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.