Literature DB >> 27235167

Lessons from genome skimming of arthropod-preserving ethanol.

B Linard1, P Arribas2,3, C Andújar4,5, A Crampton-Platt4,6, A P Vogler4,5.   

Abstract

Field-collected specimens of invertebrates are regularly killed and preserved in ethanol, prior to DNA extraction from the specimens, while the ethanol fraction is usually discarded. However, DNA may be released from the specimens into the ethanol, which can potentially be exploited to study species diversity in the sample without the need for DNA extraction from tissue. We used shallow shotgun sequencing of the total DNA to characterize the preservative ethanol from two pools of insects (from a freshwater habitat and terrestrial habitat) to evaluate the efficiency of DNA transfer from the specimens to the ethanol. In parallel, the specimens themselves were subjected to bulk DNA extraction and shotgun sequencing, followed by assembly of mitochondrial genomes for 39 of 40 species in the two pools. Shotgun sequencing from the ethanol fraction and read-matching to the mitogenomes detected ~40% of the arthropod species in the ethanol, confirming the transfer of DNA whose quantity was correlated to the biomass of specimens. The comparison of diversity profiles of microbiota in specimen and ethanol samples showed that 'closed association' (internal tissue) bacterial species tend to be more abundant in DNA extracted from the specimens, while 'open association' symbionts were enriched in the preservative fluid. The vomiting reflex of many insects also ensures that gut content is released into the ethanol, which provides easy access to DNA from prey items. Shotgun sequencing of DNA from preservative ethanol provides novel opportunities for characterizing the functional or ecological components of an ecosystem and their trophic interactions.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coleoptera; bacterial symbionts; genome skimming; mitochondrial metagenomics; preservative ethanol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27235167     DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour        ISSN: 1755-098X            Impact factor:   7.090


  22 in total

1.  Sequence Comparison Without Alignment: The SpaM Approaches.

Authors:  Burkhard Morgenstern
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Two new complete mitochondrial genomes of Dorcus stag beetles (Coleoptera, Lucanidae).

Authors:  YongJing Chen; Jing Liu; YuYan Cao; Shiju Zhou; Xia Wan
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 1.839

3.  Enabling large-scale feather mite studies: an Illumina DNA metabarcoding pipeline.

Authors:  Antón Vizcaíno; Jorge Doña; Joaquín Vierna; Neus Marí-Mena; Rocío Esteban; Sergey Mironov; Charlotte Urien; David Serrano; Roger Jovani
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Read-SpaM: assembly-free and alignment-free comparison of bacterial genomes with low sequencing coverage.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina Lau; Svenja Dörrer; Chris-André Leimeister; Christoph Bleidorn; Burkhard Morgenstern
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The Evolution of Dark Matter in the Mitogenome of Seed Beetles.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayadi; Elina Immonen; Christian Tellgren-Roth; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Genome skimming is a low-cost and robust strategy to assemble complete mitochondrial genomes from ethanol preserved specimens in biodiversity studies.

Authors:  Bruna Trevisan; Daniel M C Alcantara; Denis Jacob Machado; Fernando P L Marques; Daniel J G Lahr
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  Prospects and challenges of implementing DNA metabarcoding for high-throughput insect surveillance.

Authors:  Alexander M Piper; Jana Batovska; Noel O I Cogan; John Weiss; John Paul Cunningham; Brendan C Rodoni; Mark J Blacket
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Uncovering bacterial and functional diversity in macroinvertebrate mitochondrial-metagenomic datasets by differential centrifugation.

Authors:  Jan-Niklas Macher; Arjen Speksnijder; Le Qin Choo; Berry van der Hoorn; Willem Renema
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Metabarcoding a diverse arthropod mock community.

Authors:  Thomas W A Braukmann; Natalia V Ivanova; Sean W J Prosser; Vasco Elbrecht; Dirk Steinke; Sujeevan Ratnasingham; Jeremy R de Waard; Jayme E Sones; Evgeny V Zakharov; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 7.090

10.  Establishing arthropod community composition using metabarcoding: Surprising inconsistencies between soil samples and preservative ethanol and homogenate from Malaise trap catches.

Authors:  Daniel Marquina; Rodrigo Esparza-Salas; Tomas Roslin; Fredrik Ronquist
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 7.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.