Literature DB >> 27234650

The Effect of Different Bone Marrow Stimulation Techniques on Human Talar Subchondral Bone: A Micro-Computed Tomography Evaluation.

Arianna L Gianakos1, Youichi Yasui2, Ethan J Fraser2, Keir A Ross2, Marcelo P Prado2, Lisa A Fortier3, John G Kennedy2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate morphological alterations, microarchitectural disturbances, and the extent of bone marrow access to the subchondral bone marrow compartment using micro-computed tomography analysis in different bone marrow stimulation (BMS) techniques.
METHODS: Nine zones in a 3 × 3 grid pattern were assigned to 5 cadaveric talar dome articular surfaces. A 1.00-mm microfracture awl (s.MFX), a 2.00-mm standard microfracture awl (l.MFX), or a 1.25-mm Kirschner wire (K-wire) drill hole was used to penetrate the subchondral bone in each grid zone. Subchondral bone holes and adjacent tissue areas were assessed by micro-computed tomography to analyze adjacent bone area destruction and communicating channels to the bone marrow. Grades 1 to 3 were assigned, where 1 = minimal compression/sclerosis; 2 = moderate compression/sclerosis; 3 = severe compression/sclerosis. Bone volume/total tissue volume, bone surface area/bone volume, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number were calculated in the region of interest.
RESULTS: Visual assessment revealed that the s.MFX had significantly more grade 1 holes (P < .001) and that the l.MFX had significantly more poor/grade 3 holes (P = .002). Bone marrow channel assessment showed a statistically significant increase in the number of channels in the s.MFX when compared with both K-wire and l.MFX holes (P < .001). Bone volume fraction for the s.MFX was significantly less than that of the l.MFX (P = .029).
CONCLUSIONS: BMS techniques using instruments with larger diameters resulted in increased trabecular compaction and sclerosis in areas adjacent to the defect. K-wire and l.MFX techniques resulted in less open communicating bone marrow channels, denoting a reduction in bone marrow access. The results of this study indicate that BMS using larger diameter devices results in greater microarchitecture disturbances. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The current study suggests that the choice of a BMS technique should be carefully considered as the results indicate that smaller diameter hole sizes may diminish the amount of microarchitectural disturbances in the subchondral bone.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27234650     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  5 in total

1.  The effect of talus osteochondral defects of different area size on ankle joint stability: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Jia Li; Yezhou Wang; Yu Wei; Dan Kong; Yuan Lin; Duanyang Wang; Shi Cheng; Pengbin Yin; Min Wei
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.562

2.  The Subchondral Bone Is Affected by Bone Marrow Stimulation: A Systematic Review of Preclinical Animal Studies.

Authors:  Dexter Seow; Youichi Yasui; Ian D Hutchinson; Eoghan T Hurley; Yoshiharu Shimozono; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Review on Talus Osteochondral Injuries, Including Osteochondritis Dissecans.

Authors:  Juergen Bruns; Christian Habermann; Mathias Werner
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Current management of talar osteochondral lesions.

Authors:  Arianna L Gianakos; Youichi Yasui; Charles P Hannon; John G Kennedy
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-01-18

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Focal Cartilage Defect Treatments in Middle-Aged Versus Younger Patients.

Authors:  Ralph M Jeuken; Pieter P W van Hugten; Alex K Roth; Ufuk Tan Timur; Tim A E J Boymans; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; William D Bugbee; Pieter J Emans
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-10-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.