Literature DB >> 27234599

Collection tubes containing citrate stabiliser over-estimate plasma glucose, when compared to other samples undergoing immediate plasma separation.

Rebekah Carey1, Helen Lunt2, Helen F Heenan3, Christopher M A Frampton4, Christopher M Florkowski5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Blood collection tubes containing citrate lower pH, thereby inhibiting glycolysis. When compared to other additives, they introduce an over-estimation in measured glucose. This study explored this over-estimation across a range of glucose values. Blood samples collected into lithium-heparin tubes then cooled prior to immediate refrigerated plasma separation, were used as the primary comparator. DESIGN AND METHODS: Venous blood from individuals with and without diabetes was collected into tubes containing lithium-heparin, or fluoride, or fluoride-citrate (Terumo™ Venosafe). Plasma was separated at time intervals of zero, 2 and 24h. Preparation of the 'time zero' lithium-heparin and fluoride samples was optimised by processing these samples under cooled conditions. The remaining samples were prepared at room temperature. Plasma was analysed in the routine clinical laboratory using the hexokinase method.
RESULTS: Median plasma glucose for the 50 participants was 7.1mmol/L (range 3.1-21.5). At 'time zero', fluoride-citrate glucose was 0.37mmol/L (95% CI 0.26-0.48) higher than lithium-heparin glucose and 0.29mmol/L (95% CI 0.21-0.36) higher than glucose from fluoride tubes. Following delayed plasma separation at 24h, glucose loss from the lithium heparin tubes averaged 0.2mmol·L-1·hr-1. In contrast, the fluoride-citrate tubes showed minimal glucose loss over 24h.
CONCLUSIONS: Acid stabilises glycolysis but causes an over-estimation in glucose, across a range of plasma glucose values, when compared to blood collected into conventional tubes under cooled conditions. The magnitude of the over-estimation seen with the fluoride-citrate tubes is unlikely to be due solely to the differential glucose stabilisation rates of acid, compared to cooling. Copyright Â
© 2016 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias, systematic; Blood chemical analysis; Blood glucose; Citrate; Diabetes; Diagnosis, laboratory; Glycolysis; Plasma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27234599     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  6 in total

1.  Real-World Gestational Diabetes Screening: Problems with the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test in Rural and Remote Australia.

Authors:  Emma L Jamieson; Erica P Spry; Andrew B Kirke; David N Atkinson; Julia V Marley
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Pre-/analytical factors affecting whole blood and plasma glucose concentrations in loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta).

Authors:  Patricia E Kunze; Justin R Perrault; Yu-Mei Chang; Charles A Manire; Samantha Clark; Nicole I Stacy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Underestimation of risk for large babies in rural and remote Australia: Time to change plasma glucose collection protocols.

Authors:  Emma L Jamieson; Erica P Spry; Andrew B Kirke; Carly Roxburgh; David N Atkinson; Julia V Marley
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2021-01-01

4.  Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with Point-of-Care Methods for Glucose versus Hospital Laboratory Method Using Isotope Dilution Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry as Reference.

Authors:  Karl Kristensen; Anne-Marie Wangel; Anastasia Katsarou; Nael Shaat; David Simmons; Helena Fadl; Kerstin Berntorp
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 5.  The Oral Glucose Tolerance Test-Is It Time for a Change?-A Literature Review with an Emphasis on Pregnancy.

Authors:  Delia Bogdanet; Paula O'Shea; Claire Lyons; Amir Shafat; Fidelma Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Deviating glucose results in an international dual-center study. A root cause investigation.

Authors:  Janne Cadamuro; Peter Bergsten; Katharina Mörwald; Anders Forslund; Marie Dahlbom; Jonas Bergquist; Iris Ciba; Susanne M Brunner; Jeanne Jabbour; Daniel Weghuber
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.