Literature DB >> 27233426

Multi-center and multi-method evaluation of in vitro activities of ceftaroline against S. aureus.

Laura M Koeth1, Petra Apfalter2, Karsten Becker3, Giovanni Gesu4, Luis Martínez-Martínez5, Sushmita D Lahiri6, Richard A Alm6, Jane Ambler6, Joseph Iaconis6.   

Abstract

This five-site study was performed to assess the reproducibility of ceftaroline MIC and disk results for Staphylococcus aureus. Three commercial broth microdilution, three gradient diffusion and ceftaroline 5μg disk diffusion methods were compared to a reference broth microdilution method against challenge isolates (n = 41) and isolates collected at four European sites (n = 30/site). For four MIC methods (Sensititre and three gradient diffusion methods), 99.0% of consolidated MIC results were within +/- 1 dilution of the reference MIC. Categorical agreement rates based on EUCAST breakpoints for the challenge isolates were 75.6-100% and for disk testing were 78.0-92.7%. There was no clear distinction between isolates with MIC results of 1 and 2mg/L with regard to variation in MIC or molecular genotyping results. The addition of an intermediate category for isolates with MIC results of 2mg/L would help to identify these isolates as borderline susceptible/non-susceptible isolates.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Broth microdilution; Ceftaroline; Disk diffusion; Gradient diffusion; Method comparison

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27233426     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  1 in total

1.  Clinical Trial Assessment Principles of National Class III Medical Devices in China.

Authors:  Yue Min; Jin-Tao Gao; Jing Wu; Bao Zhai; Dan Han; Bin Liu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.071

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.