Literature DB >> 27233140

Cost Analysis and Policy Implications of a Pediatric Palliative Care Program.

Daphna Gans1, Max W Hadler2, Xiao Chen2, Shang-Hua Wu2, Robert Dimand3, Jill M Abramson3, Betty Ferrell4, Allison L Diamant5, Gerald F Kominski2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: In 2010, California launched Partners for Children (PFC), a pediatric palliative care pilot program offering hospice-like services for children eligible for full-scope Medicaid delivered concurrently with curative care, regardless of the child's life expectancy.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the change from before PFC enrollment to the enrolled period in 1) health care costs per enrollee per month (PEPM), 2) costs by service type and diagnosis category, and 3) health care utilization (days of inpatient care and length of hospital stay).
METHODS: A pre-post analysis compared enrollees' health care costs and utilization up to 24 months before enrollment with their costs during participation in the pilot, from January 2010 through December 2012. Analyses were conducted using paid Medicaid claims and program enrollment data.
RESULTS: The average PEPM health care costs of program enrollees decreased by $3331 from before their participation in PFC to the enrolled period, driven by a reduction in inpatient costs of $4897 PEPM. PFC enrollees experienced a nearly 50% reduction in the average number of inpatient days per month, from 4.2 to 2.3. Average length of stay per hospitalization dropped from an average of 16.7 days before enrollment to 6.5 days while in the program.
CONCLUSION: Through the provision of home-based therapeutic services, 24/7 access to medical advice, and enhanced, personally tailored care coordination, PFC demonstrated an effective way to reduce costs for children with life-limiting conditions by moving from costly inpatient care to more coordinated and less expensive outpatient care. PFC's home-based care strategy is a cost-effective model for pediatric palliative care elsewhere.
Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Palliative; concurrent care; cost; pediatric; policy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27233140     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  6 in total

Review 1.  How Effective Is Palliative Care in Improving Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  Sarah Milazzo; Eric Hansen; Desi Carozza; Amy A Case
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-02-05

2.  Provider-Prioritized Domains of Quality in Pediatric Home-Based Hospice and Palliative Care: A Study of the Ohio Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Network.

Authors:  Rachel Thienprayoon; Melissa San Julian Mark; Daniel Grossoehme
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 3.  Pediatric palliative care for children with cancer: a concept analysis using Rodgers' evolutionary approach.

Authors:  Parvaneh Vasli; Maryam Karami; Hanieh AsadiParvar-Masouleh
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 9.186

4.  Pediatric Concurrent Hospice Care: Cost Implications of a Hybrid Payment Model.

Authors:  Melanie J Cozad; Radion Svynarenko; Pamela S Hinds; Jennifer W Mack; Jessica Keim-Malpass; Lisa C Lindley
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.090

Review 5.  Interprofessional palliative care education for pediatric oncology clinicians: an evidence-based practice review.

Authors:  Sarah B Green; Adelais Markaki
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-11-07

Review 6.  Developing an integrated model of community-based palliative care into the primary health care (PHC) for terminally ill cancer patients in Iran.

Authors:  Suzanne Hojjat-Assari; Maryam Rassouli; Maxwell Madani; Heshmatolah Heydari
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.