Literature DB >> 27233054

Interest in initiating an early phase clinical trial: results of a longitudinal study of advanced cancer patients.

Laura B Dunn1, Jim Wiley2, Sarah Garrett3, Fay Hlubocky4, Christopher Daugherty4, Laura Trupin5, Pamela Munster6, Daniel Dohan7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Enhanced recruitment of patients with advanced cancer (ACP) to early phase (EP) trials is needed. However, selective recruitment may affect the kinds of patients who are recruited. To address whether ACP who initiate EP trial enrollment differ from those who do not, we prospectively surveyed ACP well in advance of potential trial recruitment and followed them over time to identify those who initiated the recruitment process.
METHODS: EP trial initiation was defined as a patient being referred for screening to an active EP trial. Depression and anxiety were assessed with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), respectively. Demographic and disease characteristics, functional status, and patient preferences regarding decision making were examined as possible predictors of EP trial initiation.
RESULTS: Of the 78 advanced cancer patients in the cohort studied, 21 (27%) initiated EP trial participation, while 57 (73%) did not. Of those who initiated this process, 14 (67%) went on to enroll in an EP study. Level of depression severity was associated with EP trial initiation, with rates of initiation nearly three times higher (35% vs. 12%, p = 0.054) among patients with minimal to mild levels of depression compared to those with moderate or higher levels of depression. EP trial initiation was not associated with demographic or socioeconomic variables, cancer type, functional status, quality of life, or decision-making variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of elevated depressive symptoms may be associated with the EP trial recruitment and enrollment processes. This possible relationship warrants further study.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; cancer; clinical trials; decision making; depression; oncology

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27233054     DOI: 10.1002/pon.4179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  4 in total

1.  What advanced cancer patients with limited treatment options know about clinical research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sarah B Garrett; Christopher J Koenig; Laura Trupin; Fay J Hlubocky; Christopher K Daugherty; Anne Reinert; Pamela Munster; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Before Consent: Qualitative Analysis of Deliberations of Patients With Advanced Cancer About Early-Phase Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Sarah B Garrett; Thea M Matthews; Corey M Abramson; Christopher J Koenig; Fay J Hlubocky; Christopher K Daugherty; Pamela N Munster; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-10-11

3.  Decision-making about clinical trial options among older patients with metastatic cancer who have exhausted standard therapies.

Authors:  Mazie Tsang; Rebecca J DeBoer; Sarah B Garrett; Daniel Dohan
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Anxiety Shapes Expectations of Therapeutic Benefit in Phase I Trials for Patients With Advanced Cancer and Spousal Caregivers.

Authors:  Fay J Hlubocky; Tamara G Sher; David Cella; Kristen E Wroblewski; Jeffery Peppercorn; Christopher K Daugherty
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2021-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.