| Literature DB >> 27232927 |
Markku S Nieminen1, Michael Buerke2, Alain Cohen-Solál3, Susana Costa4, István Édes5, Alexey Erlikh6, Fatima Franco4, Charles Gibson7, Vojka Gorjup8, Fabio Guarracino9, Finn Gustafsson10, Veli-Pekka Harjola11, Trygve Husebye12, Kristjan Karason13, Igor Katsytadze14, Sundeep Kaul15, Matti Kivikko16, Giancarlo Marenzi17, Josep Masip18, Simon Matskeplishvili19, Alexandre Mebazaa20, Jacob E Møller21, Jadwiga Nessler22, Bohdan Nessler23, Argyrios Ntalianis24, Fabrizio Oliva25, Emel Pichler-Cetin26, Pentti Põder27, Alejandro Recio-Mayoral28, Steffen Rex29, Richard Rokyta30, Ruth H Strasser31, Endre Zima32, Piero Pollesello16.
Abstract
Acute heart failure and/or cardiogenic shock are frequently triggered by ischemic coronary events. Yet, there is a paucity of randomized data on the management of patients with heart failure complicating acute coronary syndrome, as acute coronary syndrome and cardiogenic shock have frequently been defined as exclusion criteria in trials and registries. As a consequence, guideline recommendations are mostly driven by observational studies, even though these patients have a particularly poor prognosis compared to heart failure patients without signs of coronary artery disease. In acute heart failure, and especially in cardiogenic shock related to ischemic conditions, vasopressors and inotropes are used. However, both pathophysiological considerations and available clinical data suggest that these treatments may have disadvantageous effects. The inodilator levosimendan offers potential benefits due to a range of distinct effects including positive inotropy, restoration of ventriculo-arterial coupling, increases in tissue perfusion, and anti-stunning and anti-inflammatory effects. In clinical trials levosimendan improves symptoms, cardiac function, hemodynamics, and end-organ function. Adverse effects are generally less common than with other inotropic and vasoactive therapies, with the notable exception of hypotension. The decision to use levosimendan, in terms of timing and dosing, is influenced by the presence of pulmonary congestion, and blood pressure measurements. Levosimendan should be preferred over adrenergic inotropes as a first line therapy for all ACS-AHF patients who are under beta-blockade and/or when urinary output is insufficient after diuretics. Levosimendan can be used alone or in combination with other inotropic or vasopressor agents, but requires monitoring due to the risk of hypotension.Entities:
Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Cardiogenic shock; Heart failure; Levosimendan
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27232927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol ISSN: 0167-5273 Impact factor: 4.164