Literature DB >> 27231119

A radiological and pathological assessment of ileocolic pedicle length as a predictor of lymph node retrieval following right hemicolectomy for caecal cancer.

J G Solon1,2, A Cahalane3, J P Burke1,2, D Gibbons4, J W McCann3, S T Martin1,2, K Sheahan1,4, D C Winter5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In colon cancer, the number of harvested lymph nodes is critical for pathological staging. It has been proposed that the more central the mesenteric vascular ligation, the greater the nodal yield. The aim of the current study was to determine the association of radiological and pathological ileocolic pedicle length on nodal harvest following right hemicolectomy for caecal cancer.
METHODS: A series of 50 patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for adenocarcinoma underwent specimen evaluation. Preoperative computed tomography images were reconstructed and analysed to determine the direct (vessel origin to caecum) ileocolic pedicle length.
RESULTS: The median pathological distance from the tumour to the high vascular tie was 80 mm, and median nodal yield was 16.5 nodes. Radiological pedicle length did not correlate with the pathological distance from the tumour to the high vascular tie or nodal yield; however, the pathological pedicle length did correlate with the total nodal yield (r (2): 0.343, p = 0.015). The median pathologically determined length of colon resected (r (2): 0.153, p = 0.289), ileum resected (r (2): 0.087, p = 0.568) and total specimen length resected (r (2): 0.182, p = 0.205) did not correlate with the total nodal yield. An ileal specimen length ≤25 mm [hazard ratio (HR) 14.8, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.1-194.5, p = 0.040] and a well-differentiated tumour (HR 10.5, 95 % CI 1.1-95.9, p = 0.037) increased the likelihood of retrieving <12 lymph nodes.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, pathologic pedicle length is a determining factor in lymph node retrieval. Preoperative radiological calculation of pedicle length does not help predict the number of lymph nodes retrieved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colon cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Radiological assessment of ileocolic pedicle

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27231119     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1483-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  19 in total

1.  Disparate surgical margin lengths of colorectal resection specimens between in vivo and in vitro measurements. The effects of surgical resection and formalin fixation on organ shrinkage.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; A Soman; J Sacksner
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  E Kapiteijn; H Putter; C J H van de Velde
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The anatomical and surgical consequences of right colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Milan Spasojevic; Bojan V Stimec; Lars Bergene Gronvold; Jens-Marius Nesgaard; Bjorn Edwin; Dejan Ignjatovic
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an International Documentation System (IDS) and an International Comprehensive Anatomical Terminology (ICAT).

Authors:  L P Fielding; P A Arsenault; P H Chapuis; O Dent; B Gathright; J D Hardcastle; P Hermanek; J R Jass; R C Newland
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.029

5.  Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study.

Authors:  Claus Anders Bertelsen; Anders Ulrich Neuenschwander; Jens Erik Jansen; Michael Wilhelmsen; Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo; Jutaka Reilin Tenma; Birgitte Bols; Peter Ingeholm; Leif Ahrenst Rasmussen; Lars Vedel Jepsen; Else Refsgaard Iversen; Bent Kristensen; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Improved survival in cancer of the colon and rectum in Sweden.

Authors:  H Birgisson; M Talbäck; U Gunnarsson; L Påhlman; B Glimelius
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project.

Authors:  A L Martling; T Holm; L E Rutqvist; B J Moran; R J Heald; B Cedemark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-07-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Trends in colorectal cancer survival in northern Denmark: 1985-2004.

Authors:  L H Iversen; M Nørgaard; P Jepsen; J Jacobsen; M M Christensen; P Gandrup; M R Madsen; S Laurberg; P Wogelius; H T Sørensen
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.788

9.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

10.  The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?

Authors:  R J Heald; E M Husband; R D Ryall
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.