Len N Tran1, Anthony L Back1, Claire J Creutzfeldt2. 1. Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA. 2. Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA. clairejc@uw.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Integration of palliative care (PC) into the neurological intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) is increasingly recommended, but evidence regarding the best practice is lacking. We conducted a qualitative analysis exploring current practices and key themes of specialist PC consultations in patients admitted to a single neuro-ICU. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who were admitted to the neuro-ICU for ≥24 h and received a PC consultation between January and August 2014. We reviewed PC consultation notes and neuro-ICU progress notes from the electronic health records of these patients. We performed content analysis on the PC notes. RESULTS: Twenty-five neuro-ICU patients (4 %) received a PC consultation over 8 months with the most prevalent reason of clarifying goals of care. The main distinctions between patients with and those without (n = 580) a PC consultation were ICU length of stay (median 8.2 vs. 2.8 days) and death in the neuro-ICU (56 % vs. 11 %). The most prevalent themes addressed in the PC consultation notes were (1) discussing prognosis, (2) eliciting patient and family values, (3) understanding medical options, and (4) identifying conflict. CONCLUSIONS: PC consultations in the neuro-ICU emphasize family coping and decision-making by helping discuss prognosis and exploring patient and family values as well as their ability to understand the medical information. Several features suggest that earlier integration of PC into neuro-ICU care may enhance both coping and the decision-making process.
BACKGROUND: Integration of palliative care (PC) into the neurological intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) is increasingly recommended, but evidence regarding the best practice is lacking. We conducted a qualitative analysis exploring current practices and key themes of specialist PC consultations in patients admitted to a single neuro-ICU. METHODS: We retrospectively identified all patients who were admitted to the neuro-ICU for ≥24 h and received a PC consultation between January and August 2014. We reviewed PC consultation notes and neuro-ICU progress notes from the electronic health records of these patients. We performed content analysis on the PC notes. RESULTS: Twenty-five neuro-ICUpatients (4 %) received a PC consultation over 8 months with the most prevalent reason of clarifying goals of care. The main distinctions between patients with and those without (n = 580) a PC consultation were ICU length of stay (median 8.2 vs. 2.8 days) and death in the neuro-ICU (56 % vs. 11 %). The most prevalent themes addressed in the PC consultation notes were (1) discussing prognosis, (2) eliciting patient and family values, (3) understanding medical options, and (4) identifying conflict. CONCLUSIONS: PC consultations in the neuro-ICU emphasize family coping and decision-making by helping discuss prognosis and exploring patient and family values as well as their ability to understand the medical information. Several features suggest that earlier integration of PC into neuro-ICU care may enhance both coping and the decision-making process.
Entities:
Keywords:
Neurocritical care; Palliative care; Patient-centered; Prognosis; Qualitative research
Authors: Judith E Nelson; J Randall Curtis; Colleen Mulkerin; Margaret Campbell; Dana R Lustbader; Anne C Mosenthal; Kathleen Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Karen J Brasel; Jennifer A Frontera; Ross M Hays; David E Weissman Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jennifer A Frontera; J Randall Curtis; Judith E Nelson; Margaret Campbell; Michelle Gabriel; Anne C Mosenthal; Colleen Mulkerin; Kathleen A Puntillo; Daniel E Ray; Rick Bassett; Renee D Boss; Dana R Lustbader; Karen J Brasel; Stefanie P Weiss; David E Weissman Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jaclyn Yoong; Elyse R Park; Joseph A Greer; Vicki A Jackson; Emily R Gallagher; William F Pirl; Anthony L Back; Jennifer S Temel Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Michael J Souter; Patricia A Blissitt; Sandralee Blosser; Jordan Bonomo; David Greer; Draga Jichici; Dea Mahanes; Evie G Marcolini; Charles Miller; Kiranpal Sangha; Susan Yeager Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter May; Melissa M Garrido; J Brian Cassel; Amy S Kelley; Diane E Meier; Charles Normand; Thomas J Smith; Lee Stefanis; R Sean Morrison Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 44.544