Caroline Bodet-Milin1, Alain Faivre-Chauvet2, Thomas Carlier2, Aurore Rauscher3, Mickael Bourgeois2, Evelyne Cerato4, Vincent Rohmer5, Olivier Couturier6, Delphine Drui7, David M Goldenberg8, Robert M Sharkey9, Jacques Barbet10, Francoise Kraeber-Bodere11. 1. Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France CRCNA, Inserm U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France caroline.milin@chu-nantes.fr. 2. Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France CRCNA, Inserm U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France. 3. CRCNA, Inserm U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France Nuclear Medicine, ICO Cancer Center, Saint-Herblain, France. 4. Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France. 5. Endocrinology Department, University Hospital, Angers, France. 6. Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Angers, France. 7. Endocrinology Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France. 8. IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey; and. 9. Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey; and. 10. CRCNA, Inserm U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France GIP Arronax, Saint-Herblain, France. 11. Nuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Nantes, France CRCNA, Inserm U892, CNRS UMR 6299, Nantes, France Nuclear Medicine, ICO Cancer Center, Saint-Herblain, France.
Abstract
Earlier clinical studies reported a high sensitivity of pretargeted immunoscintigraphy using murine or chimeric anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) bispecific antibody (BsMAb) and peptides labeled with 111In or 131I in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Preclinical studies showed that new-generation humanized recombinant anti-CEA × antihistamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG) trivalent BsMAb TF2 and radiolabeled HSG peptide (IMP288) present good features for PET. This study aimed at optimizing molar doses and pretargeting interval of TF2 and 68Ga-labeled IMP288 for immuno-PET in relapsed MTC patients with calcitonin serum levels greater than 150 pg/mL. METHODS: Five cohorts (C1-C5) of 3 patients received variable molar doses of TF2 and approximately 150 MBq of 68Ga-IMP288 after different pretargeting time intervals (C1: 120 nmol TF2, 6 nmol IMP288, 24 h; C2: 120 nmol TF2, 6 nmol IMP288, 30 h; C3: 120 nmol TF2, 6 nmol IMP288, 42 h; C4: 120 nmol TF2, 3 nmol IMP288, 30 h; and C5: 60 nmol TF2, 3 nmol IMP288, 30 h). TF2 and 68Ga-IMP288 pharmacokinetics were monitored. Whole-body PET was recorded 60 and 120 min after 68Ga-IMP288 injection. Tumor maximal SUV (T-SUVmax) and T-SUVmax-to-mediastinum blood-pool (MBP) SUVmean ratios (T/MBP) were determined. RESULTS: In C1, T-SUVmax and T/MBP ranged from 4.09 to 8.93 and 1.39 to 3.72 at 60 min and 5.14 to 11.25 and 2.73 to 5.38 at 120 min, respectively. Because of the high MBP, the delay was increased to 30 h in C2, increasing T-SUVmax and T/MBP. Further increasing the delay to 42 h in C3 decreased T-SUVmax and T/MBP, showing that 30 h was the most favorable delay. In C4, the TF2-to-peptide mole ratio was increased to 40 (delay 30 h), resulting in high T-SUVmax but with higher MBP than in C2. In C5, the molar dose of TF2 was reduced, resulting in lower imaging performance. Pharmacokinetics demonstrated a fast TF2 clearance and a clear relationship between blood activity clearance and the ratio between the molar amount of injected peptide to the molar amount of circulating TF2 at the time of peptide injection. CONCLUSION: High tumor uptake and contrast can be obtained with pretargeted anti-CEA immuno-PET in relapsed MTC patients, especially using optimized pretargeting parameters: a BsMAb-to-peptide mole ratio of 20 and 30 h pretargeting delay.
Earlier clinical studies reported a high sensitivity of pretargeted immunoscintigraphy using murine or chimeric anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) bispecific antibody (BsMAb) and peptides labeled with 111In or 131I in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Preclinical studies showed that new-generation humanized recombinant anti-CEA × antihistamine-succinyl-glycine (HSG) trivalent BsMAb TF2 and radiolabeled HSG peptide (IMP288) present good features for PET. This study aimed at optimizing molar doses and pretargeting interval of TF2 and 68Ga-labeled IMP288 for immuno-PET in relapsed MTC patients with calcitonin serum levels greater than 150 pg/mL. METHODS: Five cohorts (C1-C5) of 3 patients received variable molar doses of TF2 and approximately 150 MBq of 68Ga-IMP288 after different pretargeting time intervals (C1: 120 nmol TF2, 6 nmol IMP288, 24 h; C2: 120 nmol TF2, 6 nmol IMP288, 30 h; C3: 120 nmol TF2, 6 nmol IMP288, 42 h; C4: 120 nmol TF2, 3 nmol IMP288, 30 h; and C5: 60 nmol TF2, 3 nmol IMP288, 30 h). TF2 and 68Ga-IMP288 pharmacokinetics were monitored. Whole-body PET was recorded 60 and 120 min after 68Ga-IMP288 injection. Tumor maximal SUV (T-SUVmax) and T-SUVmax-to-mediastinum blood-pool (MBP) SUVmean ratios (T/MBP) were determined. RESULTS: In C1, T-SUVmax and T/MBP ranged from 4.09 to 8.93 and 1.39 to 3.72 at 60 min and 5.14 to 11.25 and 2.73 to 5.38 at 120 min, respectively. Because of the high MBP, the delay was increased to 30 h in C2, increasing T-SUVmax and T/MBP. Further increasing the delay to 42 h in C3 decreased T-SUVmax and T/MBP, showing that 30 h was the most favorable delay. In C4, the TF2-to-peptide mole ratio was increased to 40 (delay 30 h), resulting in high T-SUVmax but with higher MBP than in C2. In C5, the molar dose of TF2 was reduced, resulting in lower imaging performance. Pharmacokinetics demonstrated a fast TF2 clearance and a clear relationship between blood activity clearance and the ratio between the molar amount of injected peptide to the molar amount of circulating TF2 at the time of peptide injection. CONCLUSION:High tumor uptake and contrast can be obtained with pretargeted anti-CEA immuno-PET in relapsed MTC patients, especially using optimized pretargeting parameters: a BsMAb-to-peptide mole ratio of 20 and 30 h pretargeting delay.
Authors: Luca Giovanella; Giorgio Treglia; Ioannis Iakovou; Jasna Mihailovic; Frederik A Verburg; Markus Luster Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Y Touchefeu; C Bailly; E Frampas; T Eugène; C Rousseau; M Bourgeois; C Bossard; A Faivre-Chauvet; A Rauscher; D Masson; A David; E Cerato; T Carlier; R M Sharkey; D M Goldenberg; J Barbet; F Kraeber-Bodere; C Bodet-Milin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Ingrid J G Burvenich; Sagun Parakh; Adam C Parslow; Sze Ting Lee; Hui K Gan; Andrew M Scott Journal: AAPS J Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 4.009