Literature DB >> 27229943

Health economic burden that different wound types impose on the UK's National Health Service.

Julian F Guest1,2, Nadia Ayoub1, Tracey McIlwraith1, Ijeoma Uchegbu1, Alyson Gerrish1, Diana Weidlich1, Kathryn Vowden3, Peter Vowden3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate the patterns of care and annual levels of health care resource use attributable to the management of different wound types by the UK's National Health Service (NHS) in 2012/2013 and the annual costs incurred by the NHS in managing them. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the records of 2000 patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database. Patients' characteristics, wound-related health outcomes and all health care resource use were quantified, and the total NHS cost of patient management was estimated at 2013/2014 prices. The NHS managed an estimated 2·2 million patients with a wound during 2012/2013. Patients were predominantly managed in the community by general practitioners (GPs) and nurses. The annual NHS cost varied between £1·94 billion for managing 731 000 leg ulcers and £89·6 million for managing 87 000 burns, and associated comorbidities. Sixty-one percent of all wounds were shown to heal in an average year. Resource use associated with managing the unhealed wounds was substantially greater than that of managing the healed wounds (e.g. 20% more practice nurse visits, 104% more community nurse visits). Consequently, the annual cost of managing wounds that healed in the study period was estimated to be £2·1 billion compared with £3·2 billion for the 39% of wounds that did not heal within the study year. Within the study period, the cost per healed wound ranged from £698 to £3998 per patient and that of an unhealed wound ranged from £1719 to £5976 per patient. Hence, the patient care cost of an unhealed wound was a mean 135% more than that of a healed wound. Real-world evidence highlights the substantial burden that wounds impose on the NHS in an average year. Clinical and economic benefits to both patients and the NHS could accrue from strategies that focus on (a) wound prevention, (b) accurate diagnosis and (c) improving wound-healing rates.
© 2016 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burden; Cost; UK; Ulcers; Wounds

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27229943      PMCID: PMC7950097          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12603

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  9 in total

Review 1.  The burden of chronic wounds in the UK.

Authors:  John Posnett; Peter J Franks
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  2008 Jan 22-28

2.  Annual costs of treatment for venous leg ulcers in Sweden and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall; Jonas Hjelmgren
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of three alternative compression systems used in the management of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  J F Guest; A Gerrish; N Ayoub; K Vowden; P Vowden
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.072

4.  The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK.

Authors:  Gerry Bennett; Carol Dealey; John Posnett
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  Clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an externally applied electroceutical device in managing venous leg ulcers in clinical practice in the UK.

Authors:  J F Guest; N Ayoub; T Greaves
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Relative cost-effectiveness of a skin protectant in managing venous leg ulcers in the UK.

Authors:  J F Guest; R R Taylor; K Vowden; P Vowden
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  A point prevalence survey of wounds in north-east England.

Authors:  N Srinivasaiah; H Dugdall; S Barrett; P J Drew
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.072

8.  Clinical and cost-effectiveness of absorbent dressings in the treatment of highly exuding VLUs.

Authors:  M Panca; K Cutting; J F Guest
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.072

9.  Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Nadia Ayoub; Tracey McIlwraith; Ijeoma Uchegbu; Alyson Gerrish; Diana Weidlich; Kathryn Vowden; Peter Vowden
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total
  48 in total

1.  Review of adjustable velcro wrap devices for venous ulceration.

Authors:  Philip W Stather; Carroll Petty; Adam Q Howard
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The evolution of virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during chronic wound infection.

Authors:  Jelly Vanderwoude; Derek Fleming; Sheyda Azimi; Urvish Trivedi; Kendra P Rumbaugh; Stephen P Diggle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Diabetic foot ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Graham W Fuller; Peter Vowden
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Venous leg ulcer management in clinical practice in the UK: costs and outcomes.

Authors:  Julian F Guest; Graham W Fuller; Peter Vowden
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Rationale for participation in venous leg ulcer clinical research: Patient interview study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  Microbiome Data Enhances Predictive Models of Lung Function in People With Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Conan Y Zhao; Yiqi Hao; Yifei Wang; John J Varga; Arlene A Stecenko; Joanna B Goldberg; Sam P Brown
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  In vitro Activity of Antimicrobial Wound Dressings on P. aeruginosa Wound Biofilm.

Authors:  Ewa Klara Stuermer; Isabell Plattfaut; Michael Dietrich; Florian Brill; Andreas Kampe; Vanessa Wiencke; Anna Ulatowski; Maria Geffken; Julian-Dario Rembe; Ella Alexandrovna Naumova; Sebastian Eike Debus; Ralf Smeets
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  S Probst; C D Weller; P Bobbink; C Saini; M Pugliese; Monika Buehrer Skinner; G Gethin
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-12

9.  Patient Explanation of Adherence and Non-Adherence to Venous Leg Ulcer Treatment: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Carolina D Weller; Catelyn Richards; Louise Turnour; Victoria Team
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  International study to develop the WOUND-Q patient-reported outcome measure for all types of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Emiel L W G van Haren; Tert C van Alphen; Stefan Cano; Karen M Cross; Anne-Margreet van Dishoeck; Kenneth L Fan; Maarten Michael Hoogbergen; Dennis Orgill; Lotte Poulsen; Jens Ahm Sørensen; Lee Squitieri; Elena Tsangaris; Dalibor Vasilic; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.