Literature DB >> 27229880

Dutch food bank parcels do not meet nutritional guidelines for a healthy diet.

Judith E Neter1, S Coosje Dijkstra1, Marjolein Visser1, Ingeborg A Brouwer1.   

Abstract

Nutritional intakes of food bank recipients and consequently their health status largely rely on the availability and quality of donated food in provided food parcels. In this cross-sectional study, the nutritional quality of ninety-six individual food parcels was assessed and compared with the Dutch nutritional guidelines for a healthy diet. Furthermore, we assessed how food bank recipients use the contents of the food parcel. Therefore, 251 Dutch food bank recipients from eleven food banks throughout the Netherlands filled out a general questionnaire. The provided amounts of energy (19 849 (sd 162 615) kJ (4744 (sd 38 866) kcal)), protein (14·6 energy percentages (en%)) and SFA (12·9 en%) in a single-person food parcel for one single day were higher than the nutritional guidelines, whereas the provided amounts of fruits (97 (sd 1441) g) and fish (23 (sd 640) g) were lower. The number of days for which macronutrients, fruits, vegetables and fish were provided for a single-person food parcel ranged from 1·2 (fruits) to 11·3 (protein) d. Of the participants, only 9·5 % bought fruits and 4·6 % bought fish to supplement the food parcel, 39·4 % used all foods provided and 75·7 % were (very) satisfied with the contents of the food parcel. Our study shows that the nutritional content of food parcels provided by Dutch food banks is not in line with the nutritional guidelines. Improving the quality of the parcels is likely to positively impact the dietary intake of this vulnerable population subgroup.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Food banks; Food parcels; IQR interquartile ranges; NEVO-code Dutch Food Composition Table code; Nutrition guidelines; Public health issues; Socio-economic status

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27229880     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114516002087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  9 in total

1.  Who uses foodbanks and why? Exploring the impact of financial strain and adverse life events on food insecurity.

Authors:  E Prayogo; A Chater; S Chapman; M Barker; N Rahmawati; T Waterfall; G Grimble
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.341

2.  How COVID-19 impacted surplus food redistribution in the Netherlands: An explorative study.

Authors:  Madhura Rao; Aalt Bast; Alie de Boer
Journal:  Food Secur       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 7.141

3.  Barriers and Facilitators for Health Behavior Change among Adults from Multi-Problem Households: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Gera E Nagelhout; Lette Hogeling; Renate Spruijt; Nathalie Postma; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Needs and perceptions regarding healthy eating among people at risk of food insecurity: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Laura A van der Velde; Linde A Schuilenburg; Jyothi K Thrivikraman; Mattijs E Numans; Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2019-11-27

5.  Improving the dietary quality of food parcels leads to improved dietary intake in Dutch food bank recipients-effects of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith E Neter; S Coosje Dijkstra; Jos W R Twisk; Marjolein Visser; Ingeborg A Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Daily Dietary Intake Patterns Improve after Visiting a Food Pantry among Food-Insecure Rural Midwestern Adults.

Authors:  Breanne N Wright; Regan L Bailey; Bruce A Craig; Richard D Mattes; Lacey McCormack; Suzanne Stluka; Lisa Franzen-Castle; Becky Henne; Donna Mehrle; Dan Remley; Heather A Eicher-Miller
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Dutch food bank recipients have poorer dietary intakes than the general and low-socioeconomic status Dutch adult population.

Authors:  J E Neter; S C Dijkstra; A L M Dekkers; M C Ocké; M Visser; I A Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 8.  Food Waste and Nutrition Quality in the Context of Public Health: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Aoife Brennan; Sarah Browne
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  [Changes in perceived food insecurity and eating behavior in the Netherlands since the COVID-19-crisis].

Authors:  Laura A van der Velde; Mattijs E Numans; Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong
Journal:  TSG       Date:  2021-07-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.