Literature DB >> 27229323

Pathogenesis and Subtype of Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) and ICH Score Determines Prognosis.

Chunyan Lei, Bo Wu, Ming Liu1, Ge Tan, Quantao Zeng.   

Abstract

CDATA[Whether original intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) score can be used to predict clinical outcomes in patients with SMASH-U (structural vascular lesions, medication, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, systemic disease, hypertension, or undetermined) classification remains an open question. This study obtained data related to consecutive acute patients with ICH from 21 tertiary hospitals in China during January 2012 to December 2014. Using the SMASH-U method, patients were classified into 6 subtypes. Favorable functional outcome and mortality was obtained after ICH at the 3 months. We used logistic regression to evaluate the effectiveness of each risk model in predicting clinical outcome and under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) to assess performance. A total of 3475 patients were included, the most common cause was hypertensive angiopathy (n=1279, 36.81%), followed by undetermined (n=1168, 33.61%), cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) (n=507, 14.59%), structural vascular lesions (n=368, 10.59%), medication (n=96, 2.76%), and systemic disease (n=57, 1.64%). For good clinical outcome (mRS≤2), the ROC values of original ICH score were 0.781, 0.701, 0.718, 0.722, 0.788, and 0.771, while for the mortality in 3-month, the ROC values of original ICH score were 0.840, 0.734, 0.836, 0.722, 0.785, 0.820, and 0.734 according to SMASH-U pathogenic classification, respectively. The ability of original ICH score may be well differentiated among the 6 ICH pathogeneses. Thus, physicians should select different risk score according to different etiological ICH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27229323     DOI: 10.2174/1567202613666160527141128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Neurovasc Res        ISSN: 1567-2026            Impact factor:   1.990


  6 in total

1.  The role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in evaluating the prognosis of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Fei Li; Qian-Xue Chen; Shou-Gui Xiang; Shi-Zhun Yuan; Xi-Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Scoping Review and Commentary on Prognostication for Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Advances in Surgical Techniques.

Authors:  Stephanie Zyck; Lydia Du; Grahame Gould; Julius Gene Latorre; Timothy Beutler; Alexa Bodman; Satish Krishnamurthy
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Nogo-A/Pir-B/TrkB Signaling Pathway Activation Inhibits Neuronal Survival and Axonal Regeneration After Experimental Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Rats.

Authors:  Yinlong Liu; Chao Ma; Haiying Li; Haitao Shen; Xiang Li; Xi'an Fu; Jiang Wu; Gang Chen
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.444

Review 4.  Changes in Cerebral Blood Flow and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Lesions After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jingfei Yang; Jie Jing; Shiling Chen; Xia Liu; Yingxin Tang; Chao Pan; Zhouping Tang
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 6.800

5.  The Pathogenesis and Influencing Factors of Adult Hypertension Based on Structural Equation Scanning.

Authors:  Yaqiong Wu; Guangyu Ma; Nana Feng; Zhiqiang Zhang; Sijie Zhang; Xingtao Li
Journal:  Scanning       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 1.750

6.  Neurofilament light chain predicts risk of recurrence in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Xin Cheng; Ya Su; Qiong Wang; Feng Gao; Xiaofei Ye; Yiqing Wang; Yiwei Xia; Jiayu Fu; Yong Shen; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Qiang Dong
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.