Literature DB >> 27228434

Effects of blood pressure lowering treatment in hypertension: 8. Outcome reductions vs. discontinuations because of adverse drug events - meta-analyses of randomized trials.

Costas Thomopoulos1, Gianfranco Parati, Alberto Zanchetti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment provided overwhelming evidence that treatment markedly reduces risk of cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients. However, adverse events associated with BP-lowering treatment have never been surveyed systematically.
OBJECTIVES: Identifying among BP-lowering RCTs those reporting a common and meaningful index of treatment-attributed adverse events, and describing the burden of these adverse events accompanying the benefits of mortality and morbidity reduction induced by treatment.
METHODS: The database consisted of the BP-lowering RCTs (active vs. placebo or less active treatment) we have described (70 RCTs, 255 970 participants, 1 091 964 patient-years). A common index of relevant adverse events was identified as permanent treatment discontinuation attributed to treatment adverse events. Risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals, standardized to a SBP/DBP reduction of 10/5 mmHg, of seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes and of treatment discontinuations for adverse events were calculated (random-effects model). The relationships of outcome reductions and discontinuation excess to SBP and DBP reductions were investigated by meta-regressions.
RESULTS: Forty-four RCTs provided data on treatment discontinuations for adverse events and six more on serious adverse events because of treatment (179 949 patients, 719 796 patient-years). In these 50 RCTs, a significant 24% reduction of major cardiovascular event risk was associated with a significant 89% increase in the risk of discontinuations (33 major cardiovascular effects prevented and 84 excess discontinuations/1000 patients for 5 years). Metaregression analysis indicated that both outcome reductions and treatment discontinuation excess were significantly related to the extent of SBP and DBP reduction, but absolute treatment discontinuation excess disproportionally increased with larger BP reductions than increase in outcome risk reduction. Furthermore, a standard SBP reduction was found associated with a constant relative reduction, but a smaller absolute reduction of cardiovascular events, and a greater relative excess of treatment discontinuations when the achieved SBP was below 130 mmHg rather than in higher ranges.
CONCLUSION: The burden of adverse events associated with BP-lowering treatment should be considered not to deny patients the overwhelming benefits of BP lowering, but whenever the extent of the BP lowering or the BP target to be achieved are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27228434     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  19 in total

Review 1.  Is there a blood pressure lowering effect of MRAs in heart failure? An overview and meta-analysis.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Costas Thomopoulos; Gary Tse; Costas Tsioufis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Association Between More Intensive vs Less Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering and Risk of Mortality in Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3 to 5: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rakesh Malhotra; Hoang Anh Nguyen; Oscar Benavente; Mihriye Mete; Barbara V Howard; Jonathan Mant; Michelle C Odden; Carmen A Peralta; Alfred K Cheung; Girish N Nadkarni; Ruth L Coleman; Rury R Holman; Alberto Zanchetti; Ruth Peters; Nigel Beckett; Jan A Staessen; Joachim H Ix
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  São Paulo call to action for the prevention and control of high blood pressure: 2020.

Authors:  Norm R C Campbell; Aletta E Schutte; Cherian V Varghese; Pedro Ordunez; Xin-Hua Zhang; Taskeen Khan; James E Sharman; Paul K Whelton; Gianfranco Parati; Michael A Weber; Marcelo Orías; Marc G Jaffe; Andrew E Moran; Frida Liane Plavnik; Venkata S Ram; Michael Brainin; Mayowa O Owolabi; Augstin J Ramirez; Eduardo Barbosa; Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Target blood pressure values in the US and European Guidelines. Are they truly similar?

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Long-term safety of different antihypertensive regimens: The risk of unfair comparisons.

Authors:  Costas Thomopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Is Blood Pressure Lowering in the Very Elderly With Previous Stroke Associated With a Higher Risk of Adverse Events?

Authors:  Damien Tharmaratnam; Christopher C Karayiannis; Taya A Collyer; Hisatomi Arima; Leslie A McClure; John Chalmers; Craig S Anderson; Oscar R Benavente; Carole L White; Ale Algra; Chris Moran; Thanh G Phan; Wei C Wang; Velandai Srikanth
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.106

7.  Blood pressure targets in adults with hypertension.

Authors:  Jose Agustin Arguedas; Viriam Leiva; James M Wright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-12-17

Review 8.  Proceedings from the 2nd European Clinical Consensus Conference for device-based therapies for hypertension: state of the art and considerations for the future.

Authors:  Felix Mahfoud; Roland E Schmieder; Michel Azizi; Atul Pathak; Horst Sievert; Costas Tsioufis; Thomas Zeller; Stefan Bertog; Peter J Blankestijn; Michael Böhm; Michel Burnier; Gilles Chatellier; Isabelle Durand Zaleski; Sebastian Ewen; Guido Grassi; Michael Joner; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Melvin D Lobo; Chaim Lotan; Thomas Felix Lüscher; Gianfranco Parati; Patrick Rossignol; Luis Ruilope; Faisal Sharif; Evert van Leeuwen; Massimo Volpe; Stephan Windecker; Adam Witkowski; William Wijns
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Aiming higher in hopes to achieve lower: the European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension versus the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for diagnosis and management of hypertension.

Authors:  Harsh Goel; Hesham Tayel; Sunil K Nadar
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  Recent changes in blood pressure levels, hypertension prevalence and treatment rates, and the rate of reaching target blood pressure in the elderly.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takase; Takamitsu Tanaka; Shin Takayama; Daishi Nonaka; Masashi Machii; Tomonori Sugiura; Sumiyo Yamashita; Nobuyuki Ohte; Yasuaki Dohi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.