Literature DB >> 27228338

Challenges in Applying the Results of Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice.

Marco A Zarbin1.   

Abstract

The relevance of clinical trial results to clinical practice hinges on 2 critical questions: Will the results be replicated in one's practice, and Are the results clinically important? The answers to the following 5 questions may help one determine how relevant a study result is to clinical practice. First, have steps been taken to minimize bias (eg, masking, randomization)? Second, is the result likely due to the treatment (vs confounding factors)? Third, is the result unlikely to be due to chance? Fourth, is the study population representative of your patients? Fifth, is the totality of the evidence consistent across studies? To determine if a study result is likely to be clinically important, consider a 3-step approach. In step 1, decide, a priori, what a clinically meaningful difference between 2 treatments would be to define regions of beneficial, harmful, and trivial outcomes. In step 2, determine whether the CIs around the average outcome include the range of beneficial outcomes and lie outside the range of harmful outcomes. In step 3, determine the proportion of patients achieving a clinically meaningful benefit. If the CIs mostly include the range of beneficial outcomes and lie outside the range of clinically harmful outcomes and if a substantial proportion of patients achieve a clinically meaningful benefit, then the intervention is probably clinically important. Application of clinical trial results to clinical practice requires critical analysis of the extant literature as well as good clinical judgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27228338     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  5 in total

1.  Applying machine learning to predict real-world individual treatment effects: insights from a virtual patient cohort.

Authors:  Gang Fang; Izabela E Annis; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Samuel Cykert
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Patient experience and quality of life during neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and study protocol.

Authors:  Jordan M Cloyd; Sarah Hyman; Tanya Huwig; Christina Monsour; Heena Santry; Celia Wills; Allan Tsung; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Clinical trials in dermatology.

Authors:  K Torre; M Shahriari
Journal:  Int J Womens Dermatol       Date:  2017-01-27

4.  Onabotulinumtoxin A for the management of chronic migraine in current clinical practice: results of a survey of sixty-three Italian headache centers.

Authors:  Cristina Tassorelli; Marco Aguggia; Marina De Tommaso; Pierangelo Geppetti; Licia Grazzi; Luigi Alberto Pini; Paola Sarchielli; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Paolo Martelletti; Pietro Cortelli
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.277

5.  Does Ophthalmology Need Philosophy?

Authors:  Doğan Ceyhan; Tekin Yaşar
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.