| Literature DB >> 27228169 |
Y Al-Hadeethi1,2, S Al-Jedani1, M A N Razvi1, A Saeed1,3, A M Abdel-Daiem1,4, M Shahnawaze Ansari5, Saeed S Babkair1, Numan A Salah4, A Al-Mujtaba1.
Abstract
Laser ablation of dental hard tissues is one of the most important laser applications in dentistry. Many works have reported the interaction of laser radiations with tooth material to optimize laser parameters such as wavelength, energy density, etc. This work has focused on determining the relationship between energy density and ablation thresholds using pulsed, 5 nanosecond, neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet; Nd:Y3Al5O12 (Nd:YAG) laser at 1064 nanometer. For enamel and dentin tissues, the ablations have been performed using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) technique. The ablation thresholds and relationship between energy densities and peak areas of calcium lines, which appeared in LIBS, were determined using data fitting. Furthermore, the morphological changes were studied using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Moreover, the chemical stability of the tooth material after ablation has been studied using Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDX). The differences between carbon atomic % of non-irradiated and irradiated samples were tested using statistical t-test. Results revealed that the best fitting between energy densities and peak areas of calcium lines were exponential and linear for enamel and dentin, respectively. In addition, the ablation threshold of Nd:YAG lasers in enamel was higher than that of dentin. The morphology of the surrounded ablated region of enamel showed thermal damages. For enamel, the EDX quantitative analysis showed that the atomic % of carbon increased significantly when laser energy density increased.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27228169 PMCID: PMC4882067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1LIBS spectra of enamel and dentin laser ablation.
The intensity in arbitrary units (a.u.) of calcium lines in the LIBS spectra of enamel and dentin Nd:YAG laser ablation.
Fig 2The relation between the peak areas of calcium lines and energy densities.
(a) calcium line peak area versus energy density for enamel (b) calcium line peak area versus energy density for dentin.
Fig 3SEM images.
Enamel surface after ablation with Nd:YAG laser at energy density of 17.2 J/cm2 and 100 shots.
Fig 4SEM images.
dentin surface after ablation with Nd:YAG laser at energy density of 11.2 J/cm2 and 100 shots.
Fig 5EDX spectra.
(A) EDX spectrum of non-irradiated enamel tissue. (B) EDX spectrum of irradiated enamel tissue at energy density of 11.2 J/m2.
Elements atomic % for non-irradiated and irradiated enamel tissue at energy densities of 5.6, 11.2, and 17.2 J/cm2.
| Elements | Non-irradiated | 5.6 (J/cm2) | 11.2 (J/cm2) | 17.2 (J/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 19.46 ± 1.53 | 34.05 ± 2.09 | 47.19 ± 4.59 | 55.88 ± 4.08 |
| O | 56.10 ± 3.01 | 49.87 ± 1.95 | 40.83 ± 6.05 | 33.92 ± 2.67 |
| P | 8.07 ± 0.56 | 5.04 ± 0.37 | 3.02 ± 0.11 | 2.45 ± 0.09 |
| Ca | 16.37 ± 3.64 | 11.04 ± 0.91 | 8.96 ± 0.39 | 7.75 ± 1.52 |
Parameters (mean ± SD).
a significant change to the non-irradiated values (p < 0.05).
Elements atomic % for non-irradiated and irradiated dentin tissue at energy densities of 5.6, 11.2, and 17.2 J/cm2.
| Elements atomic % | Non-irradiated | 5.6 (J/cm2) | 11.2 (J/cm2) | 17.2 (J/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 19.89 ± 2.13 | 23.31 ± 4.22 | 27.56 ± 4.66 | 29.85 ± 7.76 |
| O | 61.91 ± 6.52 | 60.32 ± 4.17 | 58.04 ± 6.32 | 55.96 ± 3.42 |
| P | 6.21 ± 0.53 | 5.58 ± 0.68 | 5.04 ± 0.87 | 5.03 ± 0.86 |
| Ca | 11.99 ± 2.91 | 10.79 ± 2.46 | 9.36 ± 3.19 | 9.16 ± 0.91 |
Parameters (mean ± SD).
a significant change to the non-irradiated values (p < 0.05).
Ca/P ratio for non-irradiated and irradiated enamel and dentin tissues at energy densities of 5.6, 11.2, and 17.2 J/cm2.
| Dental tissue | Non-irradiated | 5.6 (J/cm2) | 11.2 (J/cm2) | 17.2 (J/cm2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enamel | 2.03 ± 0.11 | 2.19 ± 0.16 | 2.97 ± 0.09 | 3.16 ± 0.13 |
| Dentin | 1.93 ± 0.06 | 1.93 ± 0.03 | 1.86 ± 0.08 | 1.82 ± 0.10 |
Parameters (mean ± SD).
a significant change to the non-irradiated values (p < 0.05).