| Literature DB >> 27228058 |
Irène Pegha Moukandja1,2, Jean Claude Biteghe Bi Essone1,2, Issaka Sagara3, Roland Fabrice Kassa Kassa1, Julien Ondzaga1, Jean-Bernard Lékana Douki1,2,4, Marielle Bouyou Akotet4, Dieudonne Nkoghe Mba1, Fousseyni S Touré Ndouo1.
Abstract
Control strategies implemented a decade ago led to a marked reduction in the prevalence of malaria in many countries. In Dienga, southeastern Gabon, the prevalence of microscopic P. falciparum infection was 7% in 2003, close to the pre-elimination threshold of 5%. The aim of this work was to determine the prevalence of P. falciparum infection in the same community a decade later. A cohort of 370 individuals aged from 3 to 85 years living in Dienga was investigated for P. falciparum infection; during six passages (P) in 15-month period. Demographic data were collected, along with behaviors and attitudes towards malaria. Plasmodium infection was diagnosed by microscopy (ME), followed by PCR to detect submicroscopic infection. The prevalence of P. falciparum infection in P1, P2, P3, P4, P5 and P6 was respectively 43.5% (25.1% ME+, 18.4% PCR+); 40.9% (27.0% ME+, 13.9% PCR+), 52.7% (26.1% ME+, 26.6% PCR+); 34.1% (14.1% ME+, 20% PCR+), 57.7% (25.4.% ME+, 32.3% PCR+); and 46.2% (21.4% ME+, 24.8% PCR+) with an overall average of 45.9% (95%CI [37.0-54.7], 23.2% ME+ and 22.7% PCR+). P4 and P5 prevalences were statically different throughout the six passages. Microscopic prevalence was significantly higher than that observed ten years ago (23% [n = 370] vs 7% [n = 323], p < 0.001). Asymptomatic infections were the most frequent (96%). Gametocytes were detected in levels ranging from 5.9% to 13.9%. Insecticide-treated nets, indoor residual insecticides, and self-medication were used by respectively 33.2% (95%CI [29.0-37.4]), 17.7% (95%CI [15.5-19.9]) and 12.1% (95%CI [10.6-13.6]) of the study population. A near-threefold increase in P. falciparum infection has been observed in a rural area of southeastern Gabon during a 10-year period. Most infections were asymptomatic, but these subjects likely represent a parasite reservoir. These findings call for urgent reinforcement of preventive measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27228058 PMCID: PMC4881998 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Nucleotide primers used in STEVOR gene amplification.
| Primer Name | Nucleotide sequence |
|---|---|
| P5 | 5'-GGG AAT TCT TTA TTT GAT GAA GAT G-3' |
| P18 | 5'-TTT CA(C/T) CAC CAA ACA TTT CTT-3' |
| P19 | 5'-AAT CCA CAT TAT CAC AAT GA-3' |
| P20 | 5'-CCG ATT TTA ACA TAA TAT GA-3' |
| P17 | 5'-ACA TTA TCA TAA TGA (C/T) CC AGA ACT-3' |
| P24 | 5'-GTT TGC AAT AAT TCT TTT TCT AGC-3' |
Baseline Characteristics of the study subjects.
| Apr-13 | Jun-13 | Jul-13 | Oct-13 | Mar-14 | Jun-14 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 370 | 267 | 218 | 255 | 232 | 145 | |
| 24.34 (22.65) | 24.79 (22.61) | 21.79 (19.32) | 21.88 (20.79) | 21.87 (20.77) | 17.50 (17.15) | |
| 49.70 | 50.60 | 49.10 | 49.40 | 49.60 | 54.50 | |
| 50.30 | 49.40 | 50.90 | 50.60 | 50.40 | 45.50 | |
| 8.60 | 8.60 | 9.21 | 10.20 | 9.90 | 8.30 | |
| 27.00 | 26.60 | 27.20 | 28.20 | 29.30 | 37.20 | |
| 18.10 | 16.90 | 18.47 | 20.00 | 20.70 | 26.20 | |
| 9.50 | 9.70 | 9.20 | 9.80 | 8.60 | 8.30 | |
| 36.80 | 38.30 | 35.92 | 31.80 | 31.50 | 20.00 |
Fig 1Global prevalence of malaria infection in Dienga.
*: Significant difference between the prevalences of October 2013 and those of other sampling periods except June 2014, in microscopic infection. ** : Significant difference between the prevalences of June 2013 and those of other sampling periods, in submicroscopic infection. *: Significant difference between the prevalences of July 2013 and that of June 2013, in submicroscopic infection. ***: Significant difference between the prevalence of March 2014 and those of other sampling periods except July2013 and June 2014, in submicroscopic infection. *: Significant difference between the prevalence of October 2013 and that of March 2014, in Global infection. **: Significant difference between the prevalence of March 2014, April and June 2013 in Global infection.
Global P. falciparum prevalences in Dienga.
| Sampling time | n | Microscopy % (IC95%) | Submicroscopic % (IC95%) | Global Infection % (IC95%) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 370 | 25.4 (20.9–29.9) | 18.4 (14.7–22.7) | 43.5 (38.4–48.7) | <0.001 | |
| 267 | 27.0 (21.7–32.7) | 13.9 (9.9–18.6) | 40.9 (34.9–47.0) | ||
| 218 | 26.1 (20.4–32.5) | 26.6 (20.9–33.0) | 52.7 (45.9–59.5) | ||
| 255 | 14.1 (10.1–19.0) | 20.0 (15.3–25.4) | 34.1 (28.3–40.3) | ||
| 232 | 25.4 (20.0–31.5) | 32.3 (26.4–38.8) | 57.7 (51.1–64.2) | ||
| 145 | 21.4 (15.0–29.0) | 24.8 (18.0–32.6) | 46.2 (37.9–54.7) | ||
| 23.4 (18.1–28.3) | 22.0 (15.8–29.6) | 45.4 (37.0–54.7) |
*: Significant difference between the prevalences of October 2013 and those of other sampling periods except June 2014, in microscopic infection.
** : Significant difference between the prevalences of June 2013 and those of other sampling periods, in submicroscopic infection.
*: Significant difference between the prevalences of July 2013 and that of June 2013, in submicroscopic infection.
***: Significant difference between the prevalence of March 2014 and those of other sampling periods except July2013 and June 2014, in submicroscopic infection.
*: Significant difference between the prevalence of October 2013 and that of March 2014, in the Global infection
**: Significant difference between the prevalence of March 2014, April and June 2013 in Global infection.
Fig 2Mean prevalence according to the age groups.
* Significant difference between the prevalence of individuals higher than 18years and other groups.
Fig 3Mean prevalence according to the age groups.
* Significant difference between the prevalence of males obtained by PCR and that observed among females.
Attitudes and behaviors concerning malaria.
| ITNs | P value | IRS | P value | Self-medication | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 (32.76) | 41 (17.67) | 28 (12.00) | ||||
| 37 (28.46) | 0.072* | 26 (20.00) | 0.361* | 18 (13.85) | 0.293* | |
| 39 (39.80) | 15 (15.31) | 9 (9.28) | ||||
| 30 (26.08) | 0.929** | 21 (18.26) | 0.662** | 14 (12.17) | 0.813** | |
| 46 (39.32) | 20 (17.09) | 14 (11;97) | ||||
| 38 (26.57 | 28 (19.58) | 17 (11.89) | ||||
| 38 (44.71) | 0.003*** | 13 (15.29) | 0.470*** | 10 (11.90) | 0.804*** |
N: frequency
ITNs: Insecticide Treatment Nuts
IRS: Indoor Residual Spread
Data are presented as effectives and frequencies in brackets. The symbol * is the p value traducing the comparison between the positive infection malaria and negative in each rubric (INTs, IRS and self-medication). The second symbol ** is the comparison between Males and females. The last symbol *** compares the use of the INTs, IRS and the practice of self-medication between people less than 16 years and those high than 15 years
Stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis of significant variables.
| ITNs | IRS | Self-medication | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | |
| N = 232 | n = 76 | n = 41 | n = 28 |
| Positive (n = 134) | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 |
| Negative (n = 98) | 0.60 (0.34–1.05) | 1.38 (0.69–2.75) | 1.57 (0.68–3.59) |
| Females (n = 117) | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 |
| Males (n = 115) | 0.97 (0.47–2.00) | 0. 81 (0.32–2.05) | 0.83 (0.19–3.48) |
| ≤18 (n = 159) | 1,00 | 1,00 | 1,00 |
| ≥19 (n = 73) | 2.43 (1.36–4.34) | 0. 76 (0.36–1.60) | 0.90 (0.38–2.11) |