Kazuhiro Nakamura1. 1. Department of Integrative Physiology; Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology; Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kawaguchi, Japan.
Abstract
Psychological stress-induced hyperthermia (PSH) is a basic physiological stress response to increase physical performances to defend homeostasis and life from stressors, such as natural enemies. However, excessive and long-lasting stressors can lead to chronic hyperthermia, particularly recognized in humans as a psychosomatic symptom called "psychogenic fever." The sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses that can contribute to PSH include brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis, cutaneous vasoconstriction, tachycardia and glucocorticoid secretion. Research on the central circuits underlying these stress responses has recently revealed several fundamental circuit mechanisms including hypothalamomedullary pathways driving the sympathetic stress responses. Psychological stress activates a monosynaptic glutamatergic excitatory neurotransmission from the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rostral medullary raphe region (rMR) to drive BAT thermogenesis and tachycardia, leading to the development of PSH. This glutamatergic neurotransmission could be potentiated by orexin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus through their projections to the rMR. Psychological stress also activates another monosynaptic pathway from the DMH to the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus to stimulate the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis for the secretion of glucocorticoids. PSH is independent from the prostaglandin-mediated trigger mechanism for inflammation-induced fever, and several forebrain regions are considered to provide stress-driven inputs to the DMH to activate the sympathetic- and neuroendocrine-driving neurons. The circuit mechanism of PSH based on animal experiments would be relevant to understandings of the etiology of psychogenic fever in humans. This review describes the current understandings of the central circuit mechanism of PSH with recent important progress in research.
Psychological stress-induced hyperthermia (PSH) is a basic physiological stress response to increase physical performances to defend homeostasis and life from stressors, such as natural enemies. However, excessive and long-lasting stressors can lead to chronic hyperthermia, particularly recognized in humans as a psychosomatic symptom called "psychogenic fever." The sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses that can contribute to PSH include brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis, cutaneous vasoconstriction, tachycardia and glucocorticoid secretion. Research on the central circuits underlying these stress responses has recently revealed several fundamental circuit mechanisms including hypothalamomedullary pathways driving the sympathetic stress responses. Psychological stress activates a monosynaptic glutamatergic excitatory neurotransmission from the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rostral medullary raphe region (rMR) to drive BAT thermogenesis and tachycardia, leading to the development of PSH. This glutamatergic neurotransmission could be potentiated by orexin neurons in the lateral hypothalamus through their projections to the rMR. Psychological stress also activates another monosynaptic pathway from the DMH to the paraventricular hypothalamic nucleus to stimulate the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis for the secretion of glucocorticoids. PSH is independent from the prostaglandin-mediated trigger mechanism for inflammation-induced fever, and several forebrain regions are considered to provide stress-driven inputs to the DMH to activate the sympathetic- and neuroendocrine-driving neurons. The circuit mechanism of PSH based on animal experiments would be relevant to understandings of the etiology of psychogenic fever in humans. This review describes the current understandings of the central circuit mechanism of PSH with recent important progress in research.
Psychological stress elicits a variety of autonomic responses in mammals, such as hyperthermia, tachycardia and hypertension. These stress responses all contribute to boosting physical performances: the hyperthermia warming up muscles and the central nervous system (CNS) by a few degrees Celsius and the cardiovascular responses increasing blood flows in muscles and the CNS to supply more oxygen and fuels. Therefore, these stress-induced physiological responses are thought to be beneficial in surviving the “fight or flight” situations when animals confront enemies. In contrast to these acute responses, however, long-lasting, intense stressors can cause chronic elevations in physiological parameters including body temperature and blood pressure. The stress-induced chronic hyperthermia is often called “psychogenic fever” as a psychosomatic symptom. A clinical study has reported that approximately half cases of “fever of unknown origin” (exhibiting no abnormality in diagnostic tests nor physical examination except high body temperature) are psychogenic.While there are abundant animal experimental models that can evoke such autonomic stress responses mimicking those in humans, less attention has been given to the central mechanism for psychological stress-induced hyperthermia (PSH) than those for cardiovascular stress responses. However, remarkable progress of research on the central circuitries for body temperature regulation and fever in the last decade (see review) has just stimulated new research for the mechanism by which psychological stress affects the central thermoregulatory circuits to drive PSH. As described in this review, a large part of the elevation of body temperature in response to psychological stress is an outcome of enhanced sympathetic thermogenesis and metabolism as well as decreased heat loss from the body surface. These stress-evoked thermal responses are driven by central sympathetic pathways through neural projections from the hypothalamus to the medulla oblongata, in which sympathetic premotor neurons are stimulated. This hypothalamomedullary pathway appears to be shared with the central sympathetic drives for the development of inflammation-induced fever and cold defense. Although the central circuit mechanism that converts psychologically stressful events perceived to a neural “signal” is unknown, accumulated evidence suggests that corticolimbic structures function for such psychological and emotional processing and likely provide innervations to the central sympathetic pathways through their neural projections to the hypothalamus. Several candidates of the neural projections mediating such stress-driven signaling to the hypothalamus can be proposed based on available neuroscientific literature. The central circuit mechanism for acute PSH obtained from animal research would be helpful to reveal the etiology of psychogenic fever in humans. In this review, I describe the current understandings of the central circuit mechanism of PSH, incorporating recent important discoveries.
Sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses contributing to PSH
Studies using rodents have shown that psychological stress induces a prompt elevation of body temperature predominantly by increasing metabolic heat production and decreasing heat loss from the skin surface. For cold defense and inflammation-induced fev-er, brown adipose tissue (BAT) plays as a major organ to produce heat in rodents. BAT thermogenesis also occurs in adult humans for the maintenance of body temperature in cold environments as well as for metabolic homeostasis to prevent obesity. BAT thermogenesis is controlled by sympathetic innervation primarily through the β3-adrenoceptor, which is predominantly expressed in brown adipocytes. Systemic administration of a β3-adrenoceptor antagonist in rats diminishes PSH, and thermotelemetry recordings in free-moving rats can detect psychological stress-induced BAT thermogenesis, which is represented by a rapid increase in the temperature of the interscapular BAT by approximately 2°C that precedes a rise in body core temperature (). These findings demonstrate that psychological stress induces BAT thermogenesis contributing to the development of PSH.
Sympathetic premotor neurons integrate signals from various brain regions and provide excitatory commands to sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the spinal cord to drive effector responses. Sympathetic premotor neurons for BAT thermogenesis and cutaneous vasoconstriction are localized in the rostral medullary raphe region (rMR) including the rostral raphe pallidus and raphe magnus nuclei. These neurons express the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT) 3, potentially indicative of glutamatergic neurons, and directly innervate sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the thoracic spinal cord. These neurons are labeled by transsynaptic retrograde tracing from rat interscapular BAT or tail skin blood vessels with a pseudorabies virus. Many of VGLUT3-expressing neurons in the rMR express Fos, a marker for neuronal activation, following exposure to social defeat stress, an animal model of psychological stress that is close to human social stress and induces PSH. Supporting that this is psychogenic activation, the stress-induced activation of VGLUT3 neurons in the rMR is reversed by a systemic administration of diazepam, an anxiolytic agent. These results raise the idea that psychogenic stress-driven central signals activate sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR to drive BAT thermogenesis and cutaneous vasoconstriction.Stimulation of neurons in the rMR with nanoinjection of neuroexcitatory drugs elicits BAT thermogenesis, cutaneous vasoconstriction and tachycardia. These physiological responses suggest that the rMR contains sympathetic premotor neurons innervating the heart as well as those controlling BAT and skin blood vessels. Consistent with the idea that sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR mediate the stress-induced sympathetic responses leading to PSH, inactivation of neurons in the rMR with nanoinjection of muscimol, a GABAA receptor aganist widely used as a neuronal inhibitor, suppresses psychological stress-induced BAT thermogenesis, hyperthermia () and cardiovascular responses. Blockade of glutamate receptors in the rMR also inhibits the BAT thermogenesis, hyperthermia and tachycardia induced by social defeat stress. These findings indicate that stress-driven glutamatergic inputs to the rMR, probably activating sympathetic premotor neurons, are required in the central circuit mechanisms for PSH and stress-induced tachycardia.
Hypothalamomedullary pathway driving PSH
We have recently investigated the upper brain regions that provide the stress-driven glutamatergic inputs to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR to drive PSH. Functional neuroanatomy combining retrograde neural tracing and Fos immunohistochemistry revealed a population of neurons in the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMH) that directly transmits stress-driven signals to the rMR. Injection of the retrograde neural tracer cholera toxin b-subunit (CTb) into the ratrMR labeled many neuronal cell bodies broadly distributed in dorsal areas of the hypothalamus, and subsequent exposure of the rats to social defeat stress induced Fos expression in the CTb-labeled neurons densely clustering in the dorsal part of the DMH (). Supporting that this neuronal activation is psychogenic, social defeat stress-induced Fos expression in the DMH is reduced by systemic injection of diazepam. Those stress-activated, rMR-projecting DMH neurons likely express the neuronal nitric oxide synthase. Anterograde neural tracing showed that DMH neurons provide a direct projection to VGLUT3-expressing neurons in the rMR and that these DMH-derived nerve terminals apposed to VGLUT3-expressing neurons contain the glutamatergic neuronal marker VGLUT2. These observations demonstrate that psychological stress activates a direct glutamatergic excitatory neurotransmission from the DMH to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR.
As with PSH, inflammation-induced fever is also a hyperthermic response developed through BAT thermogenesis and cutaneous vasoconstriction associated by increases in heart rate and arterial pressure. A similar set of sympathetic responses is also evoked for the maintenance of body temperature in cold environments. These febrile and cold-defensive sympathetic responses are suppressed by inactivation of neurons in either rMR or DMH, suggesting that the DMH–rMR neurotransmission drives the thermal and cardiovascular responses for fever and cold defense as well as for PSH. Although there is an exception that inactivation of DMH neurons does not inhibit febrile or spontaneous (temperature dependent) cutaneous vasoconstriction, stimulation of DMH neurons elicits cutaneous vasoconstriction. Therefore, DMH neurons might be able to drive the cutaneous vasoconstriction for the development of PSH.Either pyrogenic stimulation or cold exposure activates VGLUT3-expressing sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR. Cold exposure or lipopolysaccharide-mediated pyrogenic stimulation also activates DMH neurons projecting to the rMR. Taken together with the thermogenic and cardiovascular responses elicited by the optogenetic stimulation of DMH-derived nerve endings in the rMR (), these findings indicate that the DMH–rMR monosynaptic pathway can drive the febrile and cold-defensive sympathetic responses as well as the stress responses, by transmitting excitatory signals to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR probably through the VGLUT2-positive glutamatergic synapses. In addition to these sympathetic responses, the DMH–rMR monosynaptic pathway may also mediate febrile and cold-defensive shivering in skeletal muscles. The basal activity of the DMH–rMR monosynaptic pathway for normal thermoregulation is likely controlled by a tonic GABAergic inhibitory input from the thermoregulatory center, preoptic area (POA). The tone of the inhibitory input from the POA to the DMH is thought to be decreased by an action of the pyrogenic mediator, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (see below) or by a cool-sensory input from the skin and increased by a warm-sensory input from the skin.
DMH–PVH pathway for stress-induced activation of the HPA axis
Psychological stress stimulates the HPA axis through activating a neuroendocrine subset of neurons in the PVH, resulting in enhanced secretion of glucocorticoids from the adrenal cortex, which then causes a variety of alterations in cells throughout the body to defend homeostasis from stressors. The brain structures that provide stress-driven inputs to the PVH to stimulate the HPA axis have long been sought. DiMicco and colleagues reported that inactivation of neurons in the DMH with muscimol injections reduces air-jet stress-induced ACTH release and Fos expression in the PVH. These findings indicate that the DMH is involved in the stress signaling to the PVH to drive the neuroendocrine response. Supporting this view, our functional neuroanatomy has revealed that DMH neurons directly projecting to the PVH are activated by social defeat stress (), showing a stress-driven direct neurotransmission from the DMH to the PVH. An intriguing observation in this tracing study, which used 2 types of CTb conjugated with different fluorophores to simultaneously trace from the PVH and the rMR, is that these stress-activated, PVH-projecting neurons are clustering in the ventral part of the DMH with no overlap with the stress-activated, rMR-projecting population clustering in the dorsal part of the DMH (). Optogenetic stimulation of the DMH–PVH neurotransmission elicits neither BAT thermogenesis nor cardiovascular responses. These findings raise the view that the DMH serves as a hub for the central stress signaling by providing the sympathetic efferent through the rMR to drive BAT thermogenesis and tachycardia and by providing the neuroendocrine efferent through the PVH to stimulate the HPA axis (). Curiously, leptin activates PVH-projecting neurons in the ventral part of the DMH, suggesting that the stress-activated, PVH-projecting DMH neurons are also involved in the endocrine responses dependent on serum leptin levels reflecting the energy balance. Also, a part of these DMH neurons might be those expressing the RFamide prolactin-releasing peptide and involved in thermogenic responses to leptin.
Difference between PSH and inflammation-induced fever
As mentioned above, the DMH–rMR monosynaptic pathway driving the sympathetic responses for PSH appears to be shared with the development of inflammation-induced fever. However, PSH and fever employ different mechanisms for the activation of the DMH–rMR pathway. The trigger of the central febrile circuit mechanism is an action of the pyrogenic mediator PGE2 on prostaglandinEP3 receptors located on neurons in the POA. PGE2 is produced in endothelial cells of brain blood vessels during infection by the actions of PGE synthesising enzymes including cyclooxygenase-2, whose expression is induced in response to inflammatory cytokine signals from the immune system. Systemic administration of cyclooxygenase inhibitors suppresses fever induced by lipopolysaccaride or inflammatory cytokines, but has no effect on PSH, and mice lacking EP3 receptors fail to exhibit fever, but show intact PSH. On the other hand, anxiolytic drugs including diazepam mitigate PSH but not fever. Therefore, PSH does not involve the PGE2–EP3 receptor mechanism, different from inflammation-induced fever, but must be initiated by a mechanism that triggers the activation of the DMH neurons driving the sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses. Consistent with the dissociation of the mechanism of PSH from that of fever, a patient with psychogenic fever was reported to exhibit undetectable plasma levels of pyrogenic cytokines.
Stress-driven signaling to activate DMH neurons
How stress-driven signals are transmitted to the DMH is still unknown. There are 2 possibilities regarding the brain regions providing stress-driven inputs to the DMH. The first candidates are in the extrahypothalamic structures involved in the stress and emotional signal processing, such as the limbic system and the cerebral cortex. The DMH receives projections from limited extrahypothalamic regions, such as the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, prefrontal cortex, ventral hippocampus, amygdala and septum. Among these regions, the medial prefrontal cortex and the ventral hippocampus are the only sources of glutamatergic excitatory inputs to the DMH, while the other limbic regions provide GABAergic inhibitory projections. Social defeat stress increases Fos expression in the medial prefrontal cortex and the ventral hippocampus, which is reduced by diazepam treatment, although whether these Fos-expressing neurons project to the DMH is unknown. These anatomical observations leave open the possibility that these regions provide excitatory stress-driven signals to the DMH through the direct projections. However, inactivation of neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex has no inhibitory effect on tachycardic or pressor response to restraint stress. On the contrary, inactivation or lesions in the medial prefrontal cortex intensify stress-induced Fos expression in the DMH and PVH. Therefore, the medial prefrontal cortex might provide a signal to attenuate the cardiovascular stress responses potentially through an indirect pathway(s) to the DMH, although the role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the development of PSH has yet to be studied.The other possible mechanism for the stress afferent to the DMH is innervations from intrahypothalamic structures. Neurons projecting to the DMH are broadly distributed within the hypothalamus and provide both glutamatergic and GABAergic innervations. The POA particularly contains many GABAergic neurons projecting to the DMH, including those expressing EP3 receptors. However, the involvement of POA neurons in PSH has yet to be determined. EP3 receptor-expressing neurons in the POA are proposed to send tonic GABAergic inhibitory signals to the DMH to continuously regulate the activity of the sympathoexcitatory DMH neurons that drive the outflows to BAT and other thermal effectors. Whether psychological stress reduces the tone of the GABAergic transmission from the POA to the DMH to elicit PSH is an interesting question awaiting to be addressed.The anterior hypothalamic area has recently been proposed as a site mediating stress signaling for neuroendocrine responses through the PVH and for behavioral responses potentially through the periaqueductal gray, although whether it can also provide a stress-driven input to the DMH is unknown. The anterior hypothalamic area has been shown to receive a GABAergic input from lateral septal neurons expressing the type 2 corticotropin-releasing factor receptor. Optogenetic stimulation of this GABAergic transmission promotes, while inhibition attenuates, persistent anxious behaviors as well as circulating corticosteroid levels. Social defeat stress induces Fos expression in many neurons of the lateral septum in a diazepam-sensitive manner. With these findings, a disinhibiton mechanism of stress responses can be raised: stress-induced activation of the GABAergic transmission from the lateral septum decreases tonic inhibitory transmission from the anterior hypothalamic area to neurons in the PVH and in the periaqueductal gray, whose consequent disinhibition can lead to endocrine and behavioral stress responses. However, whether the anterior hypothalamic area provides tonic inhibition to the PVH and the periaqueductal gray is unknown.
Conclusions and perspectives
In conclusion, psychological stress induces hyperthermia through eliciting sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses including BAT thermogenesis, cutaneous vasoconstriction, tachycardia and glucocorticoid release. In the central circuit mechanism for driving the stress-induced sympathetic responses, the hypothalamomedullary glutamatergic monosynaptic pathway from the dorsal part of the DMH to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR plays an important role (). This pathway appears to be shared with the febrile and cold-defensive thermogenic and cardiovascular responses. Orexin neurons can contribute to this descending stress transmission likely through a potentiation of the glutamatergic transmission to sympathetic premotor neurons in the rMR. Another monosynaptic pathway from the ventral part of the DMH to the PVH likely contributes to stress-induced activation of the HPA axis to drive the stress hormone release (). The brain regions antecedent to the DMH in the stress circuit have yet to be identified, and it is an intriguing open question how these brain regions activate the 2 separate neuronal populations in the dorsal and ventral parts of the DMH to drive the sympathetic and neuroendocrine responses, respectively, in the coordinated manner. Many more brain structures than introduced here may be involved in the mechanism of PSH, in light of a recent curious finding that stimulation of the lateral habenula elicits BAT thermogenesis, cutaneous vasoconstriction and cardiovascular responses mimicking stress responses. Interestingly, neurons distributed medially within the lateral habenula are activated by social defeat stress in a diazepam-sensitive manner.Although the presence of functional BAT in adult humans has been proven, its contribution to PSH in humans has yet to be determined. In the modern society, psychogenic fever is becoming a major issue in psychosomatic medicine and the knowledge on the mechanism of PSH obtained from animal research may be relevant to the etiology of psychogenic fever in humans. Furthermore, a study using an animal model of panic disorder, a severe anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent panic attacks, has shown that NMDA receptor-mediated activation of DMH neurons is responsible for the development of panic-like responses, such as tachycardia, tachypnea, hypertension and increased anxiety. The DMH–rMR pathway presented in this review might mediate the sympathetic part of these panic-like responses. Human studies using state-of-the-art technologies for noninvasive imaging, such as fMRI and PET-CT scanning, could bridge the gap between the basic findings from animal research and clinical evidence on psychogenic fever and other psychosomatic symptoms including panic disorder.
Authors: Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt; Joost W Vanhommerig; Nanda M Smulders; Jamie M A F L Drossaerts; Gerrit J Kemerink; Nicole D Bouvy; Patrick Schrauwen; G J Jaap Teule Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel Björk Wilhelms; Milen Kirilov; Elahe Mirrasekhian; Anna Eskilsson; Unn Örtegren Kugelberg; Christine Klar; Dirk A Ridder; Harvey R Herschman; Markus Schwaninger; Anders Blomqvist; David Engblom Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Brent Myers; C Mark Dolgas; John Kasckow; William E Cullinan; James P Herman Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Garron T Dodd; Amy A Worth; Nicolas Nunn; Aaron K Korpal; David A Bechtold; Margaret B Allison; Martin G Myers; Michael A Statnick; Simon M Luckman Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Ana C Kunstetter; Nicolas H S Barbosa; Michele M Moraes; Valéria A Pinto; Danusa D Soares; Washington Pires; Samuel P Wanner Journal: Temperature (Austin) Date: 2017-12-18
Authors: Samuel P Wanner; M Camila Almeida; Yury P Shimansky; Daniela L Oliveira; Justin R Eales; Cândido C Coimbra; Andrej A Romanovsky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Sandy Koenig; Janne Bredehöft; Alexander Perniss; Franziska Fuchs; Joachim Roth; Christoph Rummel Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Ramón A Piñol; Sebastian H Zahler; Chia Li; Atreyi Saha; Brandon K Tan; Vojtěch Škop; Oksana Gavrilova; Cuiying Xiao; Michael J Krashes; Marc L Reitman Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 24.884