Literature DB >> 27226400

Functional and postoperative outcomes after preoperative exercise training in patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Raquel Sebio Garcia1, Maria Isabel Yáñez Brage2, Esther Giménez Moolhuyzen3, Catherine L Granger4, Linda Denehy4.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. For early stages of the disease, lung resection surgery remains the best treatment with curative intent, but significant morbidity is associated, especially among patients with poor pulmonary function and cardiorespiratory fitness. In those cases, the implementation of a preoperative exercise-based intervention could optimize patient's functional status before surgery and improve postoperative outcomes and enhance recovery. The aim of this systematic review is to provide the current body of knowledge regarding the effectiveness of a preoperative exercise-based intervention on postoperative and functional outcomes in patients with lung cancer submitted to lung resection surgery. A systematic review of the literature using CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Pubmed, PEDro and SCOPUS was undertaken in September 2015 yielding a total of 1656 references. Two independent reviewers performed the assessment of the potentially eligible records against the inclusion criteria and finally, 21 articles were included in the review. Articles were included if they examined the effects of an exercise-based intervention on at least one of the selected outcomes: pulmonary function, (functional) exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and postoperative outcomes (length of stay and postoperative complications). Fourteen studies were further selected for a meta-analysis to quantify the mean effect of the intervention and generate 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using the Cochrane Review Manager 5.0.25. For two of the outcomes included (exercise capacity and HRQoL), studies showed large heterogeneity and thus, a meta-analysis was considered inappropriate. Pulmonary function (forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s) was significantly enhanced after the intervention [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.38; 95% CI 0.14, 0.63 and SMD = 0.27, 95% CI 0.11, 0.42, respectively]. In comparison with the patients in the control groups, patients in the experimental groups spent less days in the hospital (mean difference = -4.83, 95% CI -5.9, -3.76) and had a significantly reduced risk for developing postoperative complications (risk ratios = 0.45; 95% CI 0.28, 0.74). In conclusion, preoperative exercise-based training improves pulmonary function before surgery and reduces in-hospital length of stay and postoperative complications after lung resection surgery for lung cancer.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exercise; Lung cancer; Preoperative care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27226400     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivw152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  54 in total

1.  [Applying Extended Theory of Planned Behavior for Lung Cancer Patients Undergone Pulmonary Resection: Effects on Self-Efficacy for Exercise, Physical Activities, Physical Function, and Quality of Life].

Authors:  Yeonjung Lim; Haejung Lee; Do Hyung Kim; Yeong Dae Kim
Journal:  J Korean Acad Nurs       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.984

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of Exercise Systematic Reviews in the Cancer Literature (2005-2017).

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Jennifer Baima; Anne K Swisher; Kerri M Winters-Stone; Judith Welsh
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Exercise training undertaken by people within 12 months of lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Vinicius Cavalheri; Chris Burtin; Vittoria R Formico; Mika L Nonoyama; Sue Jenkins; Martijn A Spruit; Kylie Hill
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-17

Review 4.  A Focused Review of Safety Considerations in Cancer Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susan Maltser; Adrian Cristian; Julie K Silver; G Stephen Morris; Nicole L Stout
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  The key questions in rehabilitation in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Kajan Mahendran; Babu Naidu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs in patients undergoing hepatectomy: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shuo Qi; Guodong Chen; Peng Cao; Jiangping Hu; Gengsheng He; Jiaxing Luo; Jun He; Xiuda Peng
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Prehabilitation prior to lung cancer surgery: a small step forward.

Authors:  Andrew E Giles; Sadeesh K Srinathan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Optimizing health before elective thoracic surgery: systematic review of modifiable risk factors and opportunities for health services research.

Authors:  Sean M Stokes; Elliot Wakeam; Mara B Antonoff; Leah M Backhus; Robert A Meguid; David Odell; Thomas K Varghese
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Short-term high-intensity rehabilitation in radically treated lung cancer: a three-armed randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Yutian Lai; Xudong Zhou; Shuangjiang Li; Jianhua Su; Mei Yang; Guowei Che
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  A Bibliometric Analysis of the Landscape of Cancer Rehabilitation Research (1992-2016).

Authors:  Nicole L Stout; Catherine M Alfano; Christopher W Belter; Ralph Nitkin; Alison Cernich; Karen Lohmann Siegel; Leighton Chan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.