Literature DB >> 27225774

Retinal Circuitry Balances Contrast Tuning of Excitation and Inhibition to Enable Reliable Computation of Direction Selectivity.

Alon Poleg-Polsky1, Jeffrey S Diamond2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Feedforward (FF) inhibition is a common motif in many neural networks. Typically, excitatory inputs drive both principal neurons and interneurons; the interneurons then inhibit the principal neurons, thereby regulating the strength and timing of the FF signal. The interneurons introduce a likely nonlinear processing step that could distort the excitation/inhibition (E/I) ratio in the principal neuron, potentially degrading the reliability of computation in the circuit. In the retina, FF inhibition is an essential feature of the circuitry underlying direction selectivity (DS): glutamatergic bipolar cells (BCs) provide excitatory input to direction-selective ganglion cells (DSGCs) and GABAergic starburst amacrine cells (SACs), and the SACs then provide FF inhibition onto DSGCs. Robust DS computation requires a consistent synaptic E/I ratio in the DSGC in various visual conditions. Here, we show in mouse retina that the E/I ratio is maintained in DSGCs over a wide stimulus contrast range due to compensatory mechanisms in the diverse population of presynaptic BCs. BC inputs to SACs exhibit higher contrast sensitivity, so that the subsequent nonlinear transformation in SACs reduces the contrast sensitivity of FF inhibition to match the sensitivity of direct excitatory inputs onto DSGCs. Measurements of light-evoked responses from individual BC synaptic terminals suggest that the distinct sensitivity of BC inputs reflects different contrast sensitivity between BC subtypes. Numerical simulations suggest that this network arrangement is crucial for reliable DS computation. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Properly balanced excitation and inhibition are essential for many neuronal computations across brain regions. Feedforward inhibition circuitry, in which a common excitatory source drives both the principal cell and an interneuron, is a typical mechanism by which neural networks maintain this balance. Feedforward circuits may become imbalanced at low stimulation levels, however, if the excitatory drive is too weak to overcome the activation threshold in the interneuron. Here we reveal how excitation and inhibition remain balanced in direction selective ganglion cells in the mouse retina over a wide visual stimulus range.
Copyright © 2016 the authors 0270-6474/16/365861-16$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calcium imaging; direction selectivity; feedforward; iGluSnFR; starburst amacrine; synaptic balance

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27225774      PMCID: PMC4879202          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4013-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  78 in total

1.  Selective sensitivity to direction of movement in ganglion cells of the rabbit retina.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R M HILL
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-02-01       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Vesicle depletion and synaptic depression at a mammalian ribbon synapse.

Authors:  Joshua H Singer; Jeffrey S Diamond
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Polysynaptic subcircuits in the neocortex: spatial and temporal diversity.

Authors:  Gilad Silberberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  A Role for Synaptic Input Distribution in a Dendritic Computation of Motion Direction in the Retina.

Authors:  Anna L Vlasits; Ryan D Morrie; Alexandra Tran-Van-Minh; Adam Bleckert; Christian F Gainer; David A DiGregorio; Marla B Feller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Development of asymmetric inhibition underlying direction selectivity in the retina.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Aaron M Hamby; Kaili Zhou; Marla B Feller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-12-05       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Retinal ON bipolar cells express a new PCP2 splice variant that accelerates the light response.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Pyroja Sulaiman; Rod M Feddersen; Jian Liu; Robert G Smith; Noga Vardi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  NMDA Receptors Multiplicatively Scale Visual Signals and Enhance Directional Motion Discrimination in Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  Alon Poleg-Polsky; Jeffrey S Diamond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Quinoxalines block the mechanism of directional selectivity in ganglion cells of the rabbit retina.

Authors:  E D Cohen; R F Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-02-14       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Space-time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina.

Authors:  Jinseop S Kim; Matthew J Greene; Aleksandar Zlateski; Kisuk Lee; Mark Richardson; Srinivas C Turaga; Michael Purcaro; Matthew Balkam; Amy Robinson; Bardia F Behabadi; Michael Campos; Winfried Denk; H Sebastian Seung
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Analogous Convergence of Sustained and Transient Inputs in Parallel On and Off Pathways for Retinal Motion Computation.

Authors:  Matthew J Greene; Jinseop S Kim; H Sebastian Seung
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 9.423

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  The dynamic receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Sophia Wienbar; Gregory W Schwartz
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Formation of retinal direction-selective circuitry initiated by starburst amacrine cell homotypic contact.

Authors:  Thomas A Ray; Suva Roy; Christopher Kozlowski; Jingjing Wang; Jon Cafaro; Samuel W Hulbert; Christopher V Wright; Greg D Field; Jeremy N Kay
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Cholinergic excitation complements glutamate in coding visual information in retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  Santhosh Sethuramanujam; Gautam B Awatramani; Malcolm M Slaughter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Parallel Computations in Insect and Mammalian Visual Motion Processing.

Authors:  Damon A Clark; Jonathan B Demb
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity.

Authors:  Alex S Mauss; Anna Vlasits; Alexander Borst; Marla Feller
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 6.  Structure, Function, and Pharmacology of Glutamate Receptor Ion Channels.

Authors:  Kasper B Hansen; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Derek Bowie; Hiro Furukawa; Frank S Menniti; Alexander I Sobolevsky; Geoffrey T Swanson; Sharon A Swanger; Ingo H Greger; Terunaga Nakagawa; Chris J McBain; Vasanthi Jayaraman; Chian-Ming Low; Mark L Dell'Acqua; Jeffrey S Diamond; Chad R Camp; Riley E Perszyk; Hongjie Yuan; Stephen F Traynelis
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 18.923

7.  Contributions of Rod and Cone Pathways to Retinal Direction Selectivity Through Development.

Authors:  Juliana M Rosa; Ryan D Morrie; Hans C Baertsch; Marla B Feller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A Dense Starburst Plexus Is Critical for Generating Direction Selectivity.

Authors:  Ryan D Morrie; Marla B Feller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  "Silent" NMDA Synapses Enhance Motion Sensitivity in a Mature Retinal Circuit.

Authors:  Santhosh Sethuramanujam; Xiaoyang Yao; Geoff deRosenroll; Kevin L Briggman; Greg D Field; Gautam B Awatramani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  Stimulus-dependent engagement of neural mechanisms for reliable motion detection in the mouse retina.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Wei Wei
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.