Literature DB >> 27224896

Birth defects in infants born to employees of a microelectronics and business machine manufacturing facility.

Sharon R Silver1, Lynne E Pinkerton1, Carissa M Rocheleau1, James A Deddens1, Adrian M Michalski2, Alissa R Van Zutphen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concerns about solvent releases from a microelectronics/business machine manufacturing facility in upstate New York led to interest in the health of former workers, including this investigation of birth defects in children of male and female employees.
METHODS: Children born 1983 to 2001 to facility employees were enumerated and matched to New York State's Congenital Malformations Registry. Reported structural birth defects were compared with numbers expected from state rates (excluding New York City), generating standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs). Exposure assessors classified employees as ever/never potentially exposed at the facility to metals, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and other hydrocarbons during windows critical to organogenesis (female workers) or spermatogenesis (male workers). Among workers, adjusted prevalence ratios were generated to evaluate associations between potential exposures and specific birth defects.
RESULTS: External comparisons for structural defects were at expectation for infants of male workers (SPR = 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.29; n = 60) and lower for births to female workers (SPR = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.50-1.33; n = 18). Among full-term infants of male workers, ventricular septal defects (VSDs) were somewhat elevated compared with the general population (SPR = 1.58; 95% CI, 0.99-2.39; n = 22). Within the cohort, potential paternal metal exposure was associated with increased VSD risk (adjusted prevalence ratio = 2.70; 95% CI, = 1.09-6.67; n = 7).
CONCLUSION: While overall SPRs were near expectation, paternal exposure to metals (primarily lead) appeared to be associated with increased VSD risk in infants. Take-home of occupational exposures, nonoccupational exposures, and chance could not be ruled out as causes. Case numbers for many defects were small, limiting assessment of the role of occupational exposures. Birth Defects Research (Part A) 106:696-707, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chlorinated hydrocarbons; congenital heart defects; lead; metals; occupational exposure; paternal exposure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27224896      PMCID: PMC5577556          DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  39 in total

Review 1.  Teratogen update: paternal exposures-reproductive risks.

Authors:  J M Trasler; T Doerksen
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1999-09

2.  A simple method to calculate the confidence interval of a standardized mortality ratio (SMR)

Authors:  K Ulm
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Maternal lead exposure and risk of congenital heart defects occurrence in offspring.

Authors:  Zhen Liu; Yu Yu; Xiaohong Li; Aimin Wu; Mingdao Mu; Nana Li; Ying Deng; Xi Jin; Shengli Li; Yuan Lin; Xinlin Chen; Fudi Wang; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 3.143

4.  Congenital anomalies in Glasgow between 1982 and 1989 and chromium waste.

Authors:  D Eizaguirre-García; C Rodríguez-Andrés; G C Watt
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  2000-03

5.  Maternal occupational risk factors for oral clefts. Occupational Exposure and Congenital Malformation Working Group.

Authors:  C Lorente; S Cordier; A Bergeret; H E De Walle; J Goujard; S Aymé; R Knill-Jones; E Calzolari; F Bianchi
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.024

6.  Congenital heart defects and parental occupational exposure to chemicals.

Authors:  Claudia A Snijder; Ingrid J Vlot; Alex Burdorf; Sylvia A Obermann-Borst; Willem A Helbing; Mark F Wildhagen; Eric A P Steegers; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Exposure during pregnancy to glycol ethers and chlorinated solvents and the risk of congenital malformations.

Authors:  Sylvaine Cordier; Ronan Garlantézec; Laurence Labat; Florence Rouget; Christine Monfort; Nathalie Bonvallot; Benoit Roig; Juha Pulkkinen; Cécile Chevrier; Luc Multigner
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 8.  Environmental tobacco smoke and fetal health: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Leonardi-Bee; A Smyth; J Britton; T Coleman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.747

9.  Retrospective cohort study of a microelectronics and business machine facility.

Authors:  Sharon R Silver; Lynne E Pinkerton; Donald A Fleming; James H Jones; Steven Allee; Lian Luo; Stephen J Bertke
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 10.  Drinking water contaminants and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Frank Bove; Youn Shim; Perri Zeitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

1.  The non-genetic paternal factors for congenital heart defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiayu Peng; Zhuo Meng; Shuang Zhou; Yue Zhou; Yujian Wu; Qingjie Wang; Jian Wang; Kun Sun
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 2.  Environmental Contaminants and Congenital Heart Defects: A Re-Evaluation of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rachel Nicoll
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.