Literature DB >> 27224424

Effect of a self-adhesive coating on the load-bearing capacity of tooth-coloured restorative materials.

R Bagheri1,2, Jea Palamara2, A Mese3, D J Manton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the flexural strength and Vickers hardness of tooth-coloured restorative materials with and without applying a self-adhesive coating for up to 6 months.
METHODS: Specimens were prepared from three resin composites (RC), two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (RM-GIC) and two conventional glass-ionomer cements (CGIC). All materials were tested both with and without applying G-Coat Plus (GCP). Specimens were conditioned in 37 °C distilled deionized water for 24 h, and 1, 3 and 6 months. The specimens were strength tested using a four-point bend test jig in a universal testing machine. The broken specimen's halves were used for Vickers hardness testing. Representative specimens were examined under an environmental scanning electron microscope.
RESULTS: Data analysis showed that regardless of time and materials, generally the surface coating was associated with a significant increase in the flexural strength of the materials. Applying the GCP decreased the hardness of almost all materials significantly (P < 0.05) and effect of time intervals on hardness was material dependent.
CONCLUSIONS: The load-bearing capacity of the restorative materials was affected by applying self-adhesive coating and ageing. The CGIC had significantly higher hardness but lower flexural strength than the RM-GIC and RC.
© 2016 Australian Dental Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Flexural strength; G-Coat Plus; Vickers hardness; glass-ionomer cement; resin composite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27224424     DOI: 10.1111/adj.12432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Dent J        ISSN: 0045-0421            Impact factor:   2.291


  8 in total

1.  A randomized, prospective clinical study evaluating effectiveness of a bulk-fill composite resin, a conventional composite resin and a reinforced glass ionomer in Class II cavities: one-year results.

Authors:  Hacer Balkaya; Soley Arslan; Kanşad Pala
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Flexural strengths and porosities of coated or uncoated, high powder-liquid and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.

Authors:  Nathamon Thongbai-On; Danuchit Banomyong
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Effects of surface coating on the flexural strength of fluoridereleasing restorative materials after water aging for one year.

Authors:  Muhittin Ugurlu
Journal:  Eur Oral Res       Date:  2020-05-01

4.  Microtensile bond strength of glass ionomer cements to a resin composite using universal bonding agents with and without acid etching.

Authors:  Nima Farshidfar; Mahya Agharokh; Maryam Ferooz; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Physical and Mechanical Properties of Bulk-Fill, Conventional, and Flowable Resin Composites Stored Dry and Wet.

Authors:  Dana Jafarpour; Reihaneh Ferooz; Maryam Ferooz; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-02-10

6.  Protective effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on wear resistance of glass ionomer cement restorative materials.

Authors:  Milad Moghimi; Dana Jafarpour; Reihaneh Ferooz; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Clinical wear of approximal glass ionomer restorations protected with a nanofilled self-adhesive light-cured protective coating.

Authors:  Daniela Hesse; Clarissa Calil Bonifácio; Cornelis Johannes Kleverlaan; Daniela Prócida Raggio
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  The Effect of Nanofilled Resin-Base Coating on the Mechanical and Physical Properties of Resin Composites.

Authors:  Negar Moghaddasi; Maryam Tavallali; Dana Jafarpour; Reihaneh Ferooz; Rafat Bagheri
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-10-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.