Abdullah Bin Zahid1, Artem Mikheev, Neha Srivatsa, James Babb, Uzma Samadani, Henry Rusinek. 1. From the *Department of Neurosurgery, New York University Langone Medical Center; †Department of Surgery, VA Harbor Healthcare System, Manhattan Campus; ‡Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU Langone Medical Center; §New York University, Washington Square South; and ∥Steven and Alexandra Cohen Veterans Center for Post-Traumatic Stress and Traumatic Brain Injury, New York, NY.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate computed tomography (CT)-based longitudinal markers of the progression of Alzheimer disease (AD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 33 AD patients and 39 nondemented patients with other neurological illnesses (non-AD) having 4 to 12 CT examinations of the head, with over a mean (SD) of 3.9 (1.7) years. At each time point, we applied an automatic software to measure whole brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and intracranial space volumes. Longitudinal measures were then related to disease status and time since the first scan using hierarchical models. RESULTS: Absolute brain volume loss accelerated for non-AD patients by 0.86 mL/y (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.08 mL/y) and 1.5× faster, that is, 1.32 mL/y (95% CI, 1.09-1.56 mL/y) for AD patients (P = 0.006). In terms of brain volume normalized to intracranial space, the acceleration in atrophy rate for non-AD patients was 0.0578%/y (95% CI, 0.0389%/y to 0.0767%/y), again 1.5× faster, that is, 0.0919%/y (95% CI, 0.0716%/y to 0.1122%/y) for AD patients (P = 0.017). This translates to an increase in atrophy rate from 0.5% to 1.4% in AD versus to 1.1% in non-AD group after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Brain volumetry on CT reliably detected accelerated volume loss in AD and significantly lower acceleration factor in age-matched non-AD patients, leading to the possibility of its use to monitor the progression of cognitive decline and dementia.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to validate computed tomography (CT)-based longitudinal markers of the progression of Alzheimer disease (AD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 33 ADpatients and 39 nondemented patients with other neurological illnesses (non-AD) having 4 to 12 CT examinations of the head, with over a mean (SD) of 3.9 (1.7) years. At each time point, we applied an automatic software to measure whole brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and intracranial space volumes. Longitudinal measures were then related to disease status and time since the first scan using hierarchical models. RESULTS: Absolute brain volume loss accelerated for non-ADpatients by 0.86 mL/y (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-1.08 mL/y) and 1.5× faster, that is, 1.32 mL/y (95% CI, 1.09-1.56 mL/y) for ADpatients (P = 0.006). In terms of brain volume normalized to intracranial space, the acceleration in atrophy rate for non-ADpatients was 0.0578%/y (95% CI, 0.0389%/y to 0.0767%/y), again 1.5× faster, that is, 0.0919%/y (95% CI, 0.0716%/y to 0.1122%/y) for ADpatients (P = 0.017). This translates to an increase in atrophy rate from 0.5% to 1.4% in AD versus to 1.1% in non-AD group after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Brain volumetry on CT reliably detected accelerated volume loss in AD and significantly lower acceleration factor in age-matched non-ADpatients, leading to the possibility of its use to monitor the progression of cognitive decline and dementia.
Authors: Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Michael A Kraut; Alan B Zonderman; Christos Davatzikos Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Richard A Frank; Douglas Galasko; Harald Hampel; John Hardy; Mony J de Leon; Pankaj D Mehta; Joseph Rogers; Eric Siemers; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Allison C Nugent; David A Luckenbaugh; Suzanne E Wood; Wendy Bogers; Carlos A Zarate; Wayne C Drevets Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Kelvin K Leung; Jonathan W Bartlett; Josephine Barnes; Emily N Manning; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-01-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Dennis Chan; John C Janssen; Jennifer L Whitwell; Hilary C Watt; Rhian Jenkins; Chris Frost; Martin N Rossor; Nick C Fox Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-10-04 Impact factor: 79.321