Anthony J Cornel1, Katherine K Brisco1, Wanderli P Tadei2, Nágila Fc Secundino3, Miriam S Rafael2, Allan Kr Galardo4, Jansen F Medeiros5, Felipe Ac Pessoa6, Claudia M Ríos-Velásquez6, Yoosook Lee7, Paulo Fp Pimenta3, Gregory C Lanzaro7. 1. Mosquito Control Research Laboratory, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA. 2. Laboratório de Malária e Dengue, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, AM, Brasil. 3. Laboratório de Entomologia Médica, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. 4. Laboratório de Entomologia Médica, Instituto de Pesquisas Científicas e Tecnológicas, Macapá, AP, Brasil. 5. Laboratório de Entomologia, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Porto Velho, RO, Brasil. 6. Laboratório de Ecologia de Doenças Infecciosas na Amazônia, Instituto Leônidas & Maria Deane, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Manaus, AM, Brasil. 7. Vector Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Abstract
Salivary gland polytene chromosomes of 4th instar Anopheles darlingi Root were examined from multiple locations in the Brazilian Amazon. Minor modifications were made to existing polytene photomaps. These included changes to the breakpoint positions of several previously described paracentric inversions and descriptions of four new paracentric inversions, two on the right arm of chromosome 3 and two on the left arm of chromosome 3 that were found in multiple locations. A total of 18 inversions on the X (n = 1) chromosome, chromosome 2 (n = 7) and 3 (n = 11) were scored for 83 individuals from Manaus, Macapá and Porto Velho municipalities. The frequency of 2Ra inversion karyotypes in Manaus shows significant deficiency of heterozygotes (p < 0.0009). No significant linkage disequilibrium was found between inversions on chromosome 2 and 3. We hypothesize that at least two sympatric subpopulations exist within the An. darlingi population at Manaus based on inversion frequencies.
Salivary gland polytene chromosomes of 4th instar Anopheles darlingi Root were examined from multiple locations in the Brazilian Amazon. Minor modifications were made to existing polytene photomaps. These included changes to the breakpoint positions of several previously described paracentric inversions and descriptions of four new paracentric inversions, two on the right arm of chromosome 3 and two on the left arm of chromosome 3 that were found in multiple locations. A total of 18 inversions on the X (n = 1) chromosome, chromosome 2 (n = 7) and 3 (n = 11) were scored for 83 individuals from Manaus, Macapá and Porto Velho municipalities. The frequency of 2Ra inversion karyotypes in Manaus shows significant deficiency of heterozygotes (p < 0.0009). No significant linkage disequilibrium was found between inversions on chromosome 2 and 3. We hypothesize that at least two sympatric subpopulations exist within the An. darlingi population at Manaus based on inversion frequencies.
Malaria is a persistent problem in South America, with 350,000 confirmed cases reported in
2013, of these 51% were in Brazil (WHO 2014). Most
malaria in Brazil (82%) is due to infection with Plasmodium vivax
transmitted by its major vector, Anopheles darlingi (WHO 2014, Pimenta et al. 2015).
Currently, laboratory based studies of malaria transmission are difficult because there is
no reliable protocol for P. vivax culture (Noulin et al. 2013) and no permanent Brazilian An. darlingi
colonies exist (Moreno et al. 2014, Pimenta et al. 2015). However, colonies of An.
darlingi from specimens originating from the villages of Cahuide and
Zungarococha in the Peruvian Amazon Region currently exist (Moreno et al. 2014, Villarreal-Treviño et al.
2015). Given the large geographic range of An. darlingi and the
ecological diversity in Brazil and South America, we expect that this species is comprised
of multiple, genetically distinct populations over its range, which single nucleotide
polymorphic markers seem to suggest (Emerson et al.
2015). Anopheles mosquitoes cytogenetic studies of chromosome
inversions have provided a foundation upon which population genetics studies of species
within the genus have been based (Kitzmiller 1963,
1976).Chromosome inversions represent a powerful evolutionary force largely due to the fact that
in the heterozygous condition they suppress recombination (Rieseberg 2001, Butlin 2005). This
facilitates the formation of coadapted gene complexes associated with multi-genic
phenotypes that include ecological adaptations (Besansky et
al. 2003) and behavioral patterns associated with mating (Herrera et al. 2014). Recent population genomics studies have
revitalized interest in inversions by revealing that their occurrence in genomes is far
more common than ever imagined (Feuk et al. 2005).
Therefore, contemporary population genomics research must include an awareness of the
presence of inversions within the genomes under study. In this paper, we present an update
on the polytene chromosome map of An. darlingi and some preliminary data
on the distribution of inversions among populations in Brazil.The non-random distribution of inversions within the genome and a non-random distribution
of inversions among geographical populations of An. darlingi suggest that
at least some inversions are adaptive. For example in African malaria vectors in the
Anopheles gambiae complex, there is strong evidence that certain
inversions are adaptations that allowed for ecological expansions into the different
environments occupied by various members of the complex (Coluzzi et al. 2002).Populations within the Amazon Basin near the city of Manaus (Brazil) have higher inversion
polymorphism compared to those in the southern regions of Brazil which are monomorphic for
inversions 2Ra and 2La (Kreutzer et al. 1972).
Charlwood (Charlwood 1996) noted behavioral
differences within An. darlingi are associated with chromosome inversions
and suggested that inversions may contain genes contributing to this behavioral divergence.
In forested areas near Manaus, An. darlingi populations are primarily
exophagic and exophilic, and exhibit a high degree of inversion polymorphism (Kreutzer et al. 1972, Rafael et al. 2010). In the northern region, An. darlingi is
more endophagic and less diverse chromosomally. At the southern end of its distribution
(Dourado), An. darlingi populations have no chromosomal polymorphism and
are primarily zoophilic and exophagic.It is to be expected that detailed and accurate chromosome maps will be needed for future
studies identifying associations of chromosome polymorphisms to specific genotypes (Mirabello et al. 2008) and subpopulations (Conn et al. 2006, Angella
et al. 2014) of An. darlingi. Detailed knowledge of polytene
chromosome arrangements will also be useful for accurate genome assembly using in
situ hybridizations of sequenced contigs (Marinotti et al. 2013) and for examining the intrinsic malaria parasite vector
relations and behavioral, morphological and ecological characteristics of An.
darlingi.In this study, we used unstained preparations (which provide better banding resolution than
stained chromosomes) to make small modifications to the existing An.
darlingi photomap published by Rafael et al.
(2010). We also discuss other specific variations in banding morphology that we
found. Images of previously described (Kreutzer et al.
1972, Rafael et al. 2010) and new
paracentric inversions are also provided for comparison. Preliminary results of population
genetic analysis on inversion polymorphism of Manaus populations are discussed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Salivary glands were dissected from mid-4th stage wild An. darlingi
larvae collected from multiple locations within the Brazilian Amazon Basin (Fig. 1) in Porto Velho Municipality, Rondônia state
(8.7619° S, 63.9039° W), Macapá, Amapá state (0.0339° N, 51.3500° W) and Manaus,
Amazonas state (3.1000° S, 60.0167° W). Larvae from Porto Velho were collected in the
last week of August 2014, followed by collections in Manaus in the first two weeks of
September 2014, and followed by collections in Macapá in the third week of September
2014. Larvae were identified to species using dichotomous keys (Faran & Linthicum 1981). Methods for making chromosome
preparations followed protocols described in Cornel and
Collins (2000). Briefly, salivary glands were dissected in 5% propionic acid.
Dissected salivary glands were transferred onto a siliconized microscope slide and a
drop of modified Carnoy’s solution (one part glacial acetic acid and three parts 100%
ethanol) was added to fix the tissue. Two drops of 50% propionic acid were then added
before covering the tissue with a coverslip. Excess propionic acid was absorbed onto
filter paper. Chromosome spreads were obtained by tapping with a pencil on the coverslip
several times. We found that the best chromosome banding resolution was obtained from
mid-4th stage larval salivary glands. Preparations from larvae where pupal trumpet
development could be seen under the larval exoskeleton (late 4th stage) yielded
chromosomes of poor banding resolution and integrity. All chromosome spread images were
taken at 400x magnification using a digital camera connected to a phase contrast Leica
compound microscope. Karyotype designations for each specimen examined accompanied by
raw chromosome images are available in the PopI OpenProject Adar BR
(http://popi.ucdavis.edu/). Chromosome band division numbering and subdivision lettering
followed the scheme described by Rafael et al.
(2010). Many of the inversion breakpoint locations represent probable
locations. Accurate determination of breakpoints can only be made from inversion
homozygotes. In our collections, homozygotes of many of the inversions were not
obtained. None of the images of chromosome spreads in this publication were modified,
ensuring natural and realistic views for interested readers. The chromosome images
compared and aligned with the previously published photomaps (Rafael et al. 2010) were selected to represent the qualities of
typical spreads to keep in line with our attempts to provide a more realistic
representation of the chromosomes.
Guo’s Exact Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test (HW) and Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) p
values between inversions on the same and different chromosome arms were calculated
using the Arlequin program (Excoffier & Lis- cher
2010). LD were calculated using the likelihood test based on Slatkin (1994) and Slatkin and Excoffier (1996).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
X chromosome - Images of two unstained X chromosomes in Fig. 2B (Manaus) and Fig. 2C (Macapá) show that banding intensity varies considerably between
spreads. The image from Macapá (Fig. 2C) is in
fact a more typical representation of faint unstained bands. No X a/+ or X a/a
karyotypes were seen in larvae dissected in this study. No modifications were proposed
to be made to the previously published photomap in Fig.
2A.
Fig. 2
: photomap (A) and images of Anopheles darlingi X polytene
chromosomes from Manaus, Amazonas (B) and Macapá, Amapá (C).
The right arm of chromosome 2 (2R) - The single dark band within
subdivision 15E (Fig. 3A) was never seen in any of
our chromosome spreads. Therefore, we have removed 15E from the original photomap as
depicted in Fig. 3B.
Fig. 3
: original (insert A) and modified photomap (insert B) and images of
Anopheles darlingi 2R polytene chromosomes from Macapá,
Amapá (inserts C and D). Insert E represents the centromeric joint between 2R
and 2L in a larval spread from Macapá to confirm that there is no broad band in
15E, as represented in the original photomap. Presence of two very faint bands
in this region is more representative, which has been added to 2L as
subdivision 16E (see Fig. 5B).
Probable inversion breakpoints of 2Ra, 2Rb, 2Rc and 2Rd which are inversions originally
described by Kreutzer et al. (1972) and Tadei et al. (1982) are shown in Fig. 4A. The centromeric breakpoint end of 2Rc has
been shifted from within 12E to 13B/C based on careful examination of multiple spreads
that were heterozygous for this inversion (see Fig.
4B). 2Ra homozygotes (Fig. 4B-C) were observed in 29.2% of the larvae from Manaus
(Table). One 2R a/+ was seen in Manaus.
Inversion 2R b/+ (Fig. 4D) occurred in 21.5% of
mosquitoes sampled from Manaus and one mosquito from Porto Velho (Table). Heterozygotes of inversions 2Rc (Fig. 4B-C) were found in 46.2%
of individuals from Manaus and one mosquito from Porto Velho. Heterozygotes for 2Rd
(Fig. 4C-D) were seen in 27.7% of the mosquitoes in Manaus. No homozygotes of 2Rb, 2Rc
or 2Rd were observed. Multiple mosquitoes from Manaus were heterozygous for two or more
inversions on the same chromosome arm.
Fig. 4
: modified photomap (insert A) and inversion arrangements of
Anopheles darlingi 2R chromosome arm. Breakpoint positions
are demarcated as lines in the photomap (insert A). Insert B is a chromosome
from Manaus, Amazonas, that is homozygous for 2Ra, heterozygous for 2Rb (2Rb/+)
and 2Rc (2Rc/+). Insert C is a chromosome from Manaus that is also homozygous
for 2Ra and heterozygous for 2Rc, but is heterozygous for 2Rd and insert D is a
chromosome from Manaus that is heterozygous for 2Rb and 2Rd.
TABLE
Inversion frequencies in Anopheles darlingi found within
each location
Chromosome arm
Inversion
Anopheles darlingi populations
Porto Velho
Manaus
Macapá
+/+
+/-
-/-
Total
HWE p-value
+/+
+/-
-/-
Total
HWE p-value
+/+
+/-
-/-
Total
HWE p-value
X
Xa
17
0
0
17
-
63
0
0
63
-
17
0
0
17
-
2R
2Ra
21
0
0
21
-
45
1
19
65
0.00*
17
0
0
17
-
2Rb
20
1
0
21
1
51
14
0
65
1
17
0
0
17
-
2Rc
20
1
0
21
1
35
30
0
65
0.02
17
0
0
17
-
2Rd
21
0
0
21
-
47
18
0
65
0.59
17
0
0
17
-
2L
2La
21
1
0
22
1
33
33
0
66
0.01
17
0
0
17
-
2Lb
22
0
0
22
-
66
0
0
66
-
17
0
0
17
-
2L’
21
0
1
22
0.08
55
3
7
65
0
17
0
0
17
-
3R
3Ra
21
0
0
21
-
52
14
0
66
1
17
0
0
17
-
3Rb
21
0
0
21
-
66
0
0
66
-
17
0
0
17
-
3Rc
21
0
0
21
-
60
6
0
66
1
13
4
0
17
1
3Rd
21
0
0
21
-
66
0
0
66
-
17
0
0
17
-
3Re
20
1
0
21
-
64
2
0
66
1
17
0
0
17
1
3Rf
21
0
0
21
-
54
11
1
66
0.48
17
0
0
17
-
3L
3La
20
1
0
21
-
59
7
0
66
1
16
1
0
17
1
3Lb
20
1
0
21
1
56
10
0
66
1
14
3
0
17
1
3Lc
21
0
0
21
-
65
1
0
66
1
17
0
0
17
-
3Ld
15
6
0
21
1
45
21
0
66
0.35
14
3
0
17
1
3Le
21
0
0
21
-
61
5
0
66
1
17
0
0
17
-
+: denotes standard arrangement; -: denotes inverted arrangement; HWE
p-value: denotes p-value from Guo’s exact Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test.
Only 2Ra in Manaus was significant.
+: denotes standard arrangement; -: denotes inverted arrangement; HWE
p-value: denotes p-value from Guo’s exact Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium test.
Only 2Ra in Manaus was significant.Chromosome arm 2L - Two small light colored bands were seen in almost
all spreads (Fig. 5). Therefore these two small
light bands have been inserted as subdivision 16E on the left arm of chromosome 2 as
depicted by a red marking (v.) in Fig. 5B. In most
of the spreads we examined, the two bands in 20A were lighter than as presented in the
original photomap (green lines in Figs 5-6). The area in 24C is also not always as puffed as
depicted in the photomap (Fig. 5C-D).
Fig. 5
: original photomap (insert A) and modified photomap (insert B) and images
of Anopheles darlingi 2L polytene chromosomes are depicted
from Macapá, Amapá, as inserts C and D. See text for explanation of banding
morphology modifications made to the original photomap that correspond to the
red and green lines.
Fig. 6
: images of the Anopheles darlingi 2L’ chromosome arm.
Postulated inversions required to produce the hypothetical, intermediate
arrangements between standard 2L and the rearranged 2L’ configuration are shown
using the modified photomap in insert A. An image of a homozygote 2L’/2L’
configuration from Manaus, Amazonas, is provided in insert B and the individual
from site 8 that was 2L’/? is inserted as insert C.
Additional modifications to the original 2L photomap (Fig. 5A) by Rafael et al. (2010) were
proposed, to resemble the typical banding morphology observed in chromosome spreads from
all locations we examined. We (i) removed one dark band in subdivision 23C, (ii)
replaced the two very faint bands in 23C with three narrow sharp bands and broadened the
boundary between 23C and 22A, (iii) replaced the distal diffuse area in 22A with one
distinct dark and one distinct pale band, and (iv) lightened the dark band in 22C. These
modifications were depicted in red markings in Fig.
5. We used this modified photomap to identify karyotypes in this study.An alternative arrangement in 2L extending from regions 23C to 20A, which we have called
2L’ was seen in one specimen from Porto Velho and ten specimens from Manaus (Fig. 6B). Three specimens from Manaus (sites 8 and 9)
were found in the heterozygous state, the best representation being the specimen from
site 8 (Fig. 6C). We have designated this region
as 2L’ rather than typical alphabet designations because the 2L’ arrangement cannot be
simply derived from the standard banding configuration by fixation of inversions 2La and
2Lb as originally mentioned in Kreutzer et al.
(1972). In our opinion, it involves a more complex rearrangement of three
inversions as depicted in Fig. 6A. Unfortunately,
we cannot identify the karyotype of the chromatid the 2L’ paired with in the
heterozygous specimen (Fig. 6C) because the
banding was too diffuse for a non-subjective interpretation.Likely breakpoints of inversions found in 2L (Kreutzer
et al. 1972) are demarcated in Fig. 7A.
However, according to our observations, the centromeric breakpoint of inversion 2La
should be shifted from its original position in subdivision 20A (Rafael et al. 2010) to 21D. Heterozygotes for 2La (Fig. 7B) were seen in multiple mosquitoes from Porto
Velho and Manaus. No specimens with inversion 2Lb were seen in our collection.
Fig. 7
: modified photomap and inversion arrangements of Anopheles
darlingi 2L chromosome arm. Breakpoint positions are demarcated as
lines in the modified photomap (insert A). An example of a 2La/+ heterozygote
is presented in insert B.
The right arm of chromosome 3 (3R) - Changing the intensity and size of
the three bands in 28C and 28D is the only change that we have proposed to make to the
original Rafael et al. (2010) photomap (Fig. 8A-B).
However, it should be noted that banding within divisions 34 and 35 can be variable. The
banding morphology of 3R depicted in images of chromosomes as inserts C, D and E in
Fig. 8 correspond to more typical banding
patterns.
Fig. 8
: original (insert A) and modified (insert B) photomaps and images of
Anopheles darlingi 3R polytene chromosomes (inserts C, D
and E). See text for explanation of modifications corresponding to red
arrows.
Probable inversion breakpoints identified in 3R are demarcated in Fig. 9A. Four of the inversions, viz. 3Ra, 3Rb, 3Rc
and 3Rd, have been previously described (Kreutzer et al.
1972, Rafael et al. 2010) and two of
the inversions, viz. 3Re and 3Rf, are newly described in this paper.
Breakpoints of inversions 3Rb, 3Rc and 3Rd remain unchanged. However, after careful
examination of multiple mosquitoes that were heterozygous for 3Ra, we have recommended
moving both breakpoints to new locations. Half of the specimens from Manaus subsites 7
and 9 were heterozygous for inversion 3Ra (3Ra/+), as shown in Fig. 9B. A few larvae from Manaus and Macapá were 3Rc/+ (Fig. 9C). Inversions 3Rb and 3Rd were not seen in any
specimens examined in this study. However, one specimen from the Porto Velho colony and
two from Manaus were heterozygous for inversion 3Re (3Re/+), as shown in Fig. 9D. 3Re has breakpoints very close to 3Rd
breakpoints and we are in fact unsure if this is a new inversion. A homozygote for 3Re
was not observed to verify this but for now we have called this a new inversion. One new
inversion which we have named 3Rf was seen in the heterozygous arrangement (3Rf/+) in
three specimens from Manaus (Fig. 9F) and as a
homozygote in one specimen from Manaus (Fig.
9E).
Fig. 9
: photomap and inversion arrangements of Anopheles
darlingi 3R chromosome arm. Breakpoint positions are demarcated as
lines in the photomap (A). Examples of mosquitoes that had chromosome
configurations heterozygous for inversions 3Ra, 3Rc, 3Re and 3Rf are inserted
as images in B, C, D and F. An individual that was homozygous for 3Rf is shown
in insert E. Images of chromosomes in inserts B, D, E and F were made from
larvae collected in Manaus, Amazonas, and the one in insert C was from a
mosquito collected in the site near Macapá, Amapá.
The left arm of chromosome 3 (3L) - No changes to the 3L photomap
(Fig. 10A) were proposed. Likely inversion
breakpoints found on chromosome 3L are demarcated in Fig.
11A. Three of these inversions, viz. 3La, 3Lb and 3Lc, have
been previously described (Kreutzer et al. 1972,
Rafael et al. 2010). Breakpoint positions of
inversions 3La, 3Lb and 3Lc remain unchanged. Inversion 3Lc was not observed in any
mosquito we examined. Heterozygotes for 3Lb (3Lb/+) (Fig.
11C) were observed in one specimen from Porto Velho, three mosquitoes from
Macapá, and 10 mosquitoes from Manaus. Inversion 3La (Fig. 11B) was seen in a heterozygous arrangement (3La/+) in 10.6% of the
mosquitoes from Manaus and one mosquito from both Porto Velho and Macapá. A further two
new inversions viz. 3Ld and 3Le, were found in An.
darlingi examined, in this study. Inversion 3Ld heterozygotes (3Ld/+) (Fig. 11D) were common, occurring in 31.8% of the
larvae from Manaus, 28.6% from Porto Velho, and 17.6% from Macapá. Heterozygotes for
inversion 3Le (Fig. 11E) were found in five larvae
from Manaus.
Fig. 10
: photomap (A) and images of Anopheles darlingi 3L
polytene chromosomes.
Fig. 11
: photomap and inversion arrangements of Anopheles
darlingi 3L chromosome arm. Inversion breakpoint positions are
demarcated as lines in insert A, and examples of chromosomes dissected from
mosquitoes in Manaus, Amazonas, that were heterozygous for inversions 3La, 3Lb,
3Ld and 3Le are inserted as inserts B, C, D and E respectively.
Inversion frequencies - Frequencies for each inversion from the three
main locations sampled (Porto Velho, Manaus and Macapá) are provided in Table. No
departures from HW were found in any inversion frequencies, except for inversion 2Ra in
Manaus where there was significant deficit of 2Ra/+ heterozygotes (p < 0.0009) which
may be indicative of local population structure. All inversions in chromosome 2 had
significant LD among each other except for 2Lb (p < 0.0003) (Fig. 12). All inversions in chromosome 3 were in LD with one
another, except 3Rb and 3Rd (p = 0.000) (Fig. 12).
No inversions between chromosome arms were in LD. The high degree of inversion
heterozygosity in Manaus is commensurate with findings from others (Kreutzer et al. 1972, Rafael et al. 2010), especially when compared to populations in more
southern and south-eastern locations of Brazil. In this study, considerably fewer
inversion polymorphisms were found in An. darlingi south (Porto Velho)
and east (Macapá) of Manaus. According to Morrone’s (Morrone 2014) bio-geographical classification, Macapá is located within the
Boreal Brazilian dominion, Porto Velho is within the South Brazilian dominion and Manaus
is located at the boundary between these two dominions. It is not known if the
intermediate biogeographical location of Manaus has any bearing on the high inversion
polymorphisms found there.
Fig. 12
: Linkage Disequilibrium between inversions. Colors in each square denote
p-value after multiple comparison adjustments (a). An
a less than 0.05 indicates significant LD between inversion
pairs of Anopheles darlingi polytene chromosomes from Manaus,
Amazonas, Porto Velho, Rondônia and Macapá, Amapá.
The high degree of inversion polymorphisms is interesting. No obvious phenotypic effect
of the high degree of inversion polymorphisms in An. darlingi,
especially populations within Manaus, has been found yet. There may be inversion
polymorphism advantages related to balancing selection and adaptations to xenobiotic
tolerances, climatic conditions, micro-organism exposure and larval competition that are
unique to local Manaus and the surrounding Amazon forest region. Vittor et al. (2009) postulated that deforestation, which changes
availability of shade, vegetation, hydrology, and exposure to chemical runoff from
agriculture, cities and towns all likely played a significant contributory factor to the
spread of An. darlingi in South America. Under dominance of inversions
in drier savannah versus over dominance of inversions in moist highland environments in
Anopheles funestus in Cameroon (Ayala
et al. 2013) seems to parallel that observed in An. darlingi
which also has over dominance of inversions in the moist tropical environs in Brazil.
Evidence of chromosome inversion arrangements facilitating local environmental
adaptations and spread into new locations have been found in other insects, such as
fruit flies (Rane et al. 2015).Examination of inversion polymorphisms and frequencies across the entire range of
An. darlingi will be an essential next step, especially when
examined in the context of An. darlingi potentially consisting of three
genetic clusters and perhaps species as hypothesized by Emerson et al. (2015). Examination of inversion polymorphisms in the two
current An. darlingi colonies will also be useful. If homozygotes of
inversions can be selected for in the colonies it would aid in more accurately
pinpointing the breakpoint positions of the inversions. Most inversions have only been
seen in the heterozygote arrangements which have thus far made identifying the
breakpoint positions subjective.
Authors: Míriam S Rafael; Cláudia Rohde; Letícia C Bridi; Vera Lúcia da Silva Valente Gaiesky; Wanderli P Tadei Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Lisa Mirabello; Joseph H Vineis; Stephen P Yanoviak; Vera M Scarpassa; Marinete M Póvoa; Norma Padilla; Nicole L Achee; Jan E Conn Journal: BMC Ecol Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 2.964
Authors: Lars Feuk; Jeffrey R MacDonald; Terence Tang; Andrew R Carson; Martin Li; Girish Rao; Razi Khaja; Stephen W Scherer Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2005-10-28 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Paulo F P Pimenta; Alessandra S Orfano; Ana C Bahia; Ana P M Duarte; Claudia M Ríos-Velásquez; Fabrício F Melo; Felipe A C Pessoa; Giselle A Oliveira; Keillen M M Campos; Luis Martínez Villegas; Nilton Barnabé Rodrigues; Rafael Nacif-Pimenta; Rejane C Simões; Wuelton M Monteiro; Rogerio Amino; Yara M Traub-Cseko; José B P Lima; Maria G V Barbosa; Marcus V G Lacerda Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 2.743
Authors: Marta Moreno; Carlos Tong; Mitchel Guzmán; Raul Chuquiyauri; Alejandro Llanos-Cuentas; Hugo Rodriguez; Dionicia Gamboa; Stephan Meister; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Paula Maguina; Jan E Conn; Joseph M Vinetz Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-02-17 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Aline F Angêlla; Patrícia Salgueiro; Luiz H S Gil; José L Vicente; João Pinto; Paulo E M Ribolla Journal: Malar J Date: 2014-05-29 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Gleb N Artemov; Alena I Velichevskaya; Semen M Bondarenko; Gayane H Karagyan; Sargis A Aghayan; Marine S Arakelyan; Vladimir N Stegniy; Igor V Sharakhov; Maria V Sharakhova Journal: Malar J Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 2.979