Literature DB >> 2722356

Video display terminal use and spontaneous abortion risk.

H E Bryant1, E J Love.   

Abstract

A matched case-control study investigated the potential effects of video display terminal (VDT) use on risk of spontaneous abortion in pregnancy. Structured interviews were administered to 334 cases immediately following a miscarriage. For each case, two age and parity-matched controls were enrolled, the first being a woman still pregnant (less than 25 weeks' gestation), and the second a woman in the postpartum ward of the same participating hospital. Separate analyses were carried out for each comparison group due to potential and observed differences in recall loss and selection bias. The overall exposure to VDT's during the period of interest (three months preceding the last menstrual period [LMP] to four months post-LMP) did not indicate an increased risk for either control group comparison (OR = 1.14, p = 0.47 with postnatal controls; OR = 0.80, p = 0.20 with prenatal controls). Furthermore, when exposure data were re-classified to remove women with distant or single exposures, no significant odds ratios were found. While several socioeconomic and obstetric variables were significantly associated with VDT use, multivariate analysis did not alter the lack of association of VDT use with case-control status. Finally, evidence for recall bias in postnatal control reporting, evidenced by underreporting of trivial exposures in this group, is examined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2722356     DOI: 10.1093/ije/18.1.132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  7 in total

1.  Spontaneous abortion and work with visual display units.

Authors:  E Roman; V Beral; M Pelerin; C Hermon
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-07

2.  Advice on Pre-natal Work and Employment.

Authors:  H E Bryant
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Video display terminal use during pregnancy and reproductive outcome--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Parazzini; L Luchini; C La Vecchia; P G Crosignani
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Exposure to Power-Frequency Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Infertility and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Update on the Human Evidence and Recommendations for Future Study Designs.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Andrew D Maynard; Richard L Neitzel; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Temporal variability of daily personal magnetic field exposure metrics in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Kelly R Evenson; David A Savitz; John D Meeker
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.563

6.  Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system.

Authors:  Myung Chan Gye; Chan Jin Park
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2012-03-31

Review 7.  Human adverse reproductive outcomes and electromagnetic field exposures: review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  G M Shaw; L A Croen
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.