Literature DB >> 27223488

Prevalence of Café-au-Lait Spots in children with solid tumors.

Anna Claudia Evangelista Dos Santos1,2, Benjamin Heck3, Beatriz De Camargo3,4, Fernando Regla Vargas1,2,5.   

Abstract

Cafe-au-lait maculae (CALM) are frequently observed in humans, and usually are present as a solitary spot. Multiple CALMs are present in a smaller fraction of the population and are usually associated with other congenital anomalies as part of many syndromes. Most of these syndromes carry an increased risk of cancer development. Previous studies have indicated that minor congenital anomalies may be more prevalent in children with cancer. We investigated the prevalence of CALMs in two samples of Brazilian patients with childhood solid tumors, totaling 307 individuals. Additionally, 176 school children without diagnosis of cancer, or of a cancer predisposing syndrome, were investigated for the presence of CALMs. The prevalence of solitary CALM was similar in both study groups (18% and 19%) and also in the group of children without cancer. Multiple CALMs were more frequently observed in one of the study groups (Z = 2.1). However, when both groups were analyzed together, the significance disappeared (Z = 1.5). The additional morphological abnormalities in children with multiple CALMs were analyzed and compared to the findings observed in the literature. The nosologic entities associated with CALMs are reviewed.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27223488      PMCID: PMC4910556          DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2015-0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Introduction

Café-au-lait maculae (CALM) are named after their typical coffee-and-milk hue, and a color only slightly darker than the surrounding skin. There are two main types of CALMs. The most common type has fairly regular and clearly demarcated margins ("coast of California"). They may range in size from a few millimeters to several centimeters and may be present as solitary or as multiple spots. There is a second, less frequent type of CALM that has a much more irregular margin ("coast of Maine"), and is usually larger and solitary (Aase, 1990). At birth, a single CALM is observed in 5% of Caucasians and up to 15% of Americans of African descent. Three or more spots are observed in 2% of the population (Aase, 1990). CALMs may occur as isolated findings, or may be associated with minor and/or major congenital anomalies, as part of many syndromes. CALMs are typically observed in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), an autosomal dominant condition characterized by the presence of multiple neurofibromas, as well as other non-tumoral manifestations, like multiple CALMs, which are present in almost all adult patients with this disease. CALMs are usual findings in many other monogenic diseases, as well as in chromosomal abnormalities that are associated with mosaicism. This is the case with chromosomal rings, which are usually unstable during cell division, resulting in chromosomal mosaics. Interestingly, many of these genetically determined conditions that present with CALMs do also carry increased predisposition to cancer development. For this reason, we set out to investigate the prevalence of CALMs in children with and without cancer. Two groups of children with a pediatric solid tumor, resident in two states in southeastern Brazil (Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo), were independently examined for the presence of cutaneous pigmentary changes. A third group of children without cancer was also examined.

Methods

Two study groups of children (ages 0-18 years) with current or previous diagnosis of a pediatric solid tumor were examined by a medical geneticist trained in dysmorphology. Study groups 1 and 2 are composed of children with current or previous diagnosis of a pediatric solid tumor: study group 1 (226 individuals) is from Rio de Janeiro (RJ); study group 2 (81 individuals) is from Sao Paulo (SP). The two cities are located in contiguous states in southeastern Brazil. Additionally, a third group (Study group 3) from Rio de Janeiro (RJ), and is composed of 176 school children without diagnosis of cancer or of a cancer predisposing syndrome. Age distribution among the three study groups did not show statistical differences. Both groups of children with cancer are part of a larger study aimed at investigating the prevalence of major and minor congenital anomalies in children with cancer. The same protocol for description of minor anomalies and morphologic variants based on the studies of Merks , 2006) was applied in all three study groups. The presence of two or more café-au-lait maculae was defined as "multiple CALMs". Analysis of the frequency of CALMs between the different study groups was accomplished through estimation of Z scores. We considered Z > 1.96 (two standard deviations) as the threshold for significance. Children with hematologic malignancies were not included in the study. Data on the size (diameter) of each individual café-au-lait spot, as well as ethnic background of the affected individuals were not collected in the present study. The present study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board of all involved institutions (83/08). Subjects were included in the study after discussion and signature of the informed consent by their parents and/or legal guardian.

Results and discussion

In the present study, two study groups of patients with pediatric solid tumors were independently investigated for the presence of CALM by two trained dysmorphologists. The same protocol was applied in a third group of children without diagnosis of cancer or of a cancer predisposing syndrome. Our study identified 28 children with multiple CALMs, 25 of which were associated with other congenital anomalies. The frequency of solitary CALMs was similar in the study groups 1 and 2 (children with solid tumors), and did not differ from that observed among school children without cancer (Z = 1.2 and Z = 0.5, respectively). The frequency of multiple CALMs, however, was higher in group 1 (12%) than in group 2 (5%), and also than that of the group of children without cancer (Z = 2.8). However, when both study groups 1 and 2 were analyzed together, the difference with the group without cancer became of borderline significance (Z = 2.0). These data are shown in Table 1. The additional findings observed in each patient are shown in Table 2. Table 3 shows the prevalence of each congenital anomaly within the patient group. A known syndromic diagnosis could be suspected in four patients. Additional patients presented multiple findings compatible with the clinical presumption of a dysmorphic, private syndrome (Table 2). Table 4 shows the main nosologic entities associated with multiple CALMs.
Table 1

Observed numbers of solitary and multiple CALMs in study groups 1, 2 and 3, along with expected numbers and Z scores for study groups 1, 2 and 1 + 2.

cohort 1
Ntotal%EZ
café-au-lait, solitary4020020%331.2
café-au-lait, multiple2420012%14 2.8
cohort 2
café-au-lait, solitary158119%130.5
café-au-lait, multiple4815%6-0.6
cohort 1 + 2
café-au-lait, solitary5528120%461.3
café-au-lait, multiple2828110%19 2.0
cohort 3 (control)
café-au-lait, solitary2917617%- -
café-au-lait, multiple121767%- -

Legend: E = expected number; N = observed number; Z = Z score. Statistically significant Z scores are marked in bold.

Table 2

Additional birth defects, congenital anomalies, and morphologic variants detected by ectoscopy in children with pediatric solid tumor and multiple CALMs. Cases are stratified by tumor and by cohort.

caseTusAgeadditional congenital anomaliessyndr dx
study group 1
1Ccrcf10obesity, macrocephaly, ocular hypertelorism-
2Cnsf7diastema-
3Cnsm13ephelidesNF1
4Cnsm6broad halluces; hypo/depigmented spots; hemangioma-
5Ewif18upper limb asymmetry; thorax asymmetry; hyperconvex nails-
6Hbm1epicanthus-
7Nbf17--
8Nbf4epicanthus; anteverted nares; anti-Mongoloid palpebral slant; strabismus-
9Nbf3clinodac; asymmetry; short, thin, brittle, hyperconvex nails; multiple nevi-
10Nbf15partial syndactyly II-III; hyperconvex nails-
11Osf13tall stature; obesity; macrocephaly; hypoplastic nails-
12Osf14short stature; fetal pads; clinodactyly; multiple nevi-
13Pnsmtm10hypo/depigmented spots; cleft lip/palate?
14Rbm5--
15Rmsf14hemangioma-
16Rmsm10anteverted nares-
17Rmsf2--
18SSm15partial syndactyly II-III; lower limb asymmetry; macrocephaly-
19Wtm3transverse palmar crease; multiple nevi; partial syndactyly II-III feet?
20Wtf6partial syndactyly II-III; hemangioma-
21Wtm7macrostomia, lower limb asymmetry; fetal pads; multiple nevi, supernumerary nippleSGB ?
22Wtm7genu varum; solitary nevus-
23Wtm9multiple nevi-
24Stsf8hallux valgus; haemangioma-
study group 2
25Cnsm12prominent philtrum; low hanging columella; nevus of Ota; cow lick; thorax asymmetry-
26Fsm9ocular hypertelorism, webbed neck, thorax asymmetry, winged scapulae, fibromataJC ?
27Wtf5triangular face, frontal bossing, dry hair, prominent philtrum, high palate, camptodactyly?
28Gctf9synophrys, heterochromia iris, microstomia, pectus carinatum, cubitus valgus, fibromataNF1

Legend: age = age at examination (years); ccrc = clear-cell renal carcinoma; cns = central nervous system; ewi = Ewing sarcoma; fs = fibrosarcoma; gct = germ cell tumor; hb = hepatoblastoma; JC = Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome; nb = neuroblastma; NF1 = neurofibromatosis 1; os = osteosarcoma; rb = retinoblastoma; rms = rhabdomyosarcoma; s = sex; ss = synovial sarcoma; sts = soft tissue sarcoma; syndr dx = syndromic diagnosis; wt = Wilms tumor.

Table 3

Birth defects, congenital anomalies, and morphologic variants observed in children with pediatric solid tumor and multiple CALMs. Variants marked with an asterisk (*) have been previously associated with pediatric cancer (Merks ).

Additional congenital anomaliesN
growth
tall stature *1
short stature2
thin, BMI < 202
overweight, BMI > 251
head / face
macrocephaly *3
Dolicocephaly1
Brachycephaly1
prominent forehead1
cow lick1
triangular face3
round face1
asymmetry, face1
eye / ocular
Hypotelorism1
Strabismus1
antimongoloid slant1
epicanthal folds5
Synophorus1
heterochromia, Iris1
almond shaped eyes1
sparse eyebrows / eyelashes5
long eyelashes1
Ptosis1
ear / auricular
large earlobe / indentations earlobe2
ear pit1
Darwin's lump1
Microtia1
nose / nasal
broad nasal base2
flat nasal bridge1
broad nose2
broad nasal bridge2
flat nose1
low hanging columella4
long / prominent philtrum4
anteverted nares5
hypoplastic alae nasae *1
mouth / oral
Macrostomia1
cleft lip1
Diastema1
multiple frenulae1
supernumerary tooth1
torus palatinus1
retro/micrognathia *1
hypertrophy gum1
hoarse voice2
high arched palate2
pointed chin1
neck / trunk
asymmetry, thorax3
short / broad neck2
pectus carinatum1
hypertelorism, nipple1
winged scapulae1
scoliosis *1
upper limbs
asymmetry, upper limbs1
Clinodactyly5
Camptodactyly1
cubitus valgus4
transverse palmar crease1
Sydney line *3
ulnar deviation, fingers1
fetal pads3
hypoplastic / hyperconvex nails *5
lower limbs
asymmetry, lower limbs *2
hypermobility, lower limbs1
genu varum1
curved tibiae1
long feet2
syndactyly II-III, feet4
hallux valgus2
skin / hair
hemangioma *4
Ephelides1
nevus, solitary3
nevus, multiple5
hypo /depigmented areas2
thin hair1
Table 4

Main syndromes associated with CALMs.

gene(s) / chromosomal regionsinherCALMsmain neoplasias
monogenic (Mendelian)
Ataxia-telangectasia9 ATM AR> 50%leukemia, lymph, breast
Bloom22,25 RECQL3 AR> 50%leukemia, lymph, carcin
Cardio-Facio-Cutaneous14,15,18 BRAF, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, KRAS AD> 30%ALL, HB, NHL
Carney complex PRKAR1A AD< 50%LCCSCT, PMS, endo tu
CMMRDS16,27 MHS2, PMS2, MSH6, MLH1 AR> 50%CRC, CNS, PST
Cowden20 PTEN AD< 50%breast, thyroid, skin
Fanconi anemia26 FANCA to FANCL AR/XL< 50%MDS, AML, solid tu
Gorlin17 PTCH AD< 50%BCC, MB
Jaffe-Campanacci23 NF1 AD> 99%?
Legius13,24 SPRED1 AD99%-
Leopard5 PTPN11, RAF1, BRAF AD70%NB
McCune-Albright7 GNAS1 (somatic, mosaic)spo> 50%sarcoma, breast, thyroid
MEN14 MEN1 AD40%endocrine
Neurofibromatosis 113,24 NF1 AD> 95%leukemia, GIST, breast
Neurofibromatosis 221 NF2 AD< 10%CNS, schwannoma
Nijmegen25 NBN AR< 50%lymph, solid tu
Noonan15,18 PTPN11, SOS1, RAF1, KRAS AD10%JMML
RAPADILINO19,22 RECQL4 AR< 50%osteosarcoma
Rothmund-Thompson11,22 RECQL4 AR< 50%skin, osteosarcoma
Tuberous sclerosis10,12 TSC1, TSC2 AD< 50%CNS
Chromosomal
Ring chromosome8 chromosomes 7,11,12,15,17,22spo> 50%leukemia, WT
Chromosomal mosaicism2 mosaic trisomies / monosomiesspo< 50%leukemia
Uniparental disomy (UPD)
Maternal UPD78 7pspo< 50%-
Russell-Silver1,3,6 11p15, 7p13spo/AD< 50%WT, craniopharyngioma

Legend: AD = autosomal dominant; ALL = acute lymphoid leukemia; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; AR = autosomal recessive; BCC = basal cell carcinoma; carcin = carcinoma; CMMRDS = congenital mismatch repair deficiency syndrome; CNS = central nervous system; CRC = colorectal cancer; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HB = hepatoblastoma; inher = inheritance; JMML = juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia; MB = medulloblastoma; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; MEN1 = multiple endocrine neoplasia 1; NB = neuroblastoma; NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma; spo = sporadic; WT Wilms tumor; XL = X-linked. References: 1 - Bruckheimer and Abrahamov, 1993; 2 - Carella ; 3 - Chitayat ; 4 - Darling ; 5 - Digilio ; 6 - Draznin ; 7 - Dumitrescu and Collins, 2008; 8 - Fujino ; 9 - Greenberger ; 10 - Józwiak ; 11 - Larizza ; 12 - Leung and Robson, 2007; 13 - Maertens ; 14 - Makita ; 15 - Ohtake ; 16 - Poley ; 17 - Ponti ; 18 - Rauen ; 19 - Sandoval ; 20 - Scheper ; 21 - Seminog and Goldacre ; 22 - Siitonen ; 23 - Stewart ; 24 - Wang ; 25 - Weemaes ; 26 - Giampietro . 27 - Wimmer .

Legend: E = expected number; N = observed number; Z = Z score. Statistically significant Z scores are marked in bold. Legend: age = age at examination (years); ccrc = clear-cell renal carcinoma; cns = central nervous system; ewi = Ewing sarcoma; fs = fibrosarcoma; gct = germ cell tumor; hb = hepatoblastoma; JC = Jaffe-Campanacci syndrome; nb = neuroblastma; NF1 = neurofibromatosis 1; os = osteosarcoma; rb = retinoblastoma; rms = rhabdomyosarcoma; s = sex; ss = synovial sarcoma; sts = soft tissue sarcoma; syndr dx = syndromic diagnosis; wt = Wilms tumor. Legend: AD = autosomal dominant; ALL = acute lymphoid leukemia; AML = acute myeloid leukemia; AR = autosomal recessive; BCC = basal cell carcinoma; carcin = carcinoma; CMMRDS = congenital mismatch repair deficiency syndrome; CNS = central nervous system; CRC = colorectal cancer; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HB = hepatoblastoma; inher = inheritance; JMML = juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia; MB = medulloblastoma; MDS = myelodysplastic syndrome; MEN1 = multiple endocrine neoplasia 1; NB = neuroblastoma; NHL = non-Hodgkin lymphoma; spo = sporadic; WT Wilms tumor; XL = X-linked. References: 1 - Bruckheimer and Abrahamov, 1993; 2 - Carella ; 3 - Chitayat ; 4 - Darling ; 5 - Digilio ; 6 - Draznin ; 7 - Dumitrescu and Collins, 2008; 8 - Fujino ; 9 - Greenberger ; 10 - Józwiak ; 11 - Larizza ; 12 - Leung and Robson, 2007; 13 - Maertens ; 14 - Makita ; 15 - Ohtake ; 16 - Poley ; 17 - Ponti ; 18 - Rauen ; 19 - Sandoval ; 20 - Scheper ; 21 - Seminog and Goldacre ; 22 - Siitonen ; 23 - Stewart ; 24 - Wang ; 25 - Weemaes ; 26 - Giampietro . 27 - Wimmer . Burwell observed a single café-au-lait spot in 20% and multiple spots in 6% of 732 school children. Merks observed 13% of single spots and 3.3% of multiple spots in healthy children. According to Tekin , single spots may be observed in up to 27% in children under 10 years of age. Multiple café-au-lait spots were observed in cancer predisposing syndromes like neurofibromatosis 1, neurofibromatosis 2, tuberous sclerosis, McCune-Albright syndrome, Fanconi anemia, among others (Evans ; Giampietro ; Roach ; Kim ; Ferner ). More recently, café-au-lait spots were observed in 60% of carriers of biallelic mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes (Wimmer ), characteristic of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome (CMMRDS). These authors developed a score for investigation of this condition that includes the presence of CALMs and suggested that a score of three or more points warrants investigation of CMMRDS (Wimmer ). Merks studied 1,073 children with cancer and observed major abnormalities in 26.8% of the patients vs. 15.5% in controls (p = 0.001), and minor anomalies in 65.1% of the patients vs. 56.2% in controls (p = 0.001). Three or more minor anomalies were detected in 15.2% of the patients and in 8.3% of the controls (p = 0.001). A known cancer predisposing syndrome could be detected or suspected in 7.2% of the patients. The same authors (Merks ) observed 17 morphological abnormalities that occurred more frequently in pediatric cancer patients than in controls: blepharophimosis, asymmetric lower limbs, Sydney crease, broad foot, isolated short metacarpals, short distal phalanx of the thumb, portwine stain, hyperconvex nails, retrognathia, hypoplastic alae nasae, prominent ears, broad hand, scoliosis, hypertelorism, tall stature, macrocephaly, and microcephaly. Interestingly, CALMs are not included in this group. Two of these 17 congenital anomalies, blepharophimosis and asymmetric lower limbs, showed patterns of non-random association with other minor anomalies. The so-called "blepharophimosis pattern" consisted of the preferential association of blepharophimosis, increased anterior-posterior angulation of the spine, patchy hypopigmentation of the skin, and multiple CALMs. The asymmetric lower limb pattern consists of asymmetric lower limbs, tall stature, midface hypoplasia, ptosis, and pectus carinatum or excavatum. It is worthy of note that, from 17 congenital anomalies described by Merks , eight were observed in at least one patient from our sample: tall stature, macrocephaly, ocular hypertelorism, hypoplastic alae nasae, retrognathia, scoliosis, hyperconvex nails, asymmetric lower limbs, and hemangioma. These anomalies are marked with an asterisk in Table 3. We did not observe any patient with the complete pattern described by Merks . However, two patients presented the association of multiple CALMS and hypopigmented / depigmented spots, suggestive of the "blepharophimosis pattern" (Table 3). It is important to take into consideration that we have included only patients with pediatric solid tumors in the study, while the sample studied by Merks was composed of all pediatric malignancies. In fact, almost half (438 out of 1,073) of the children studied by Merks were carriers of hematological malignancies (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or acute myeloid leukemia). In summary, our study showed that the frequency of solitary CALMs is not significantly increased in children with pediatric solid tumors. Multiple CALMs were more frequently observed in one of our studied samples (study group 1, Z = 2.8). However, the combined analysis of the studied samples (study groups 1 and 2) showed only borderline significance (Z = 2.0). Hence, the identification of multiple CALMs in a child with cancer warrants further morphologic evaluation, given the great number of cancer predisposing syndromes associated with multiple CALMs.
  37 in total

1.  Osteosarcoma following growth hormone therapy in recurrent acute lymphoblastic leukemia and Rapadilino syndrome.

Authors:  Claudio Sandoval; Julie Dunbar; Mehmet Ozkaynak; Somasundaram Jayabose
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.969

2.  Multiple facial angiofibromas and collagenomas in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

Authors:  T N Darling; M C Skarulis; S M Steinberg; S J Marx; A M Spiegel; M Turner
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1997-07

Review 3.  Tuberous sclerosis complex: a review.

Authors:  Alexander K C Leung; W Lane M Robson
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.812

4.  A genetic study of type 2 neurofibromatosis in the United Kingdom. II. Guidelines for genetic counselling.

Authors:  D G Evans; S M Huson; D Donnai; W Neary; V Blair; V Newton; T Strachan; R Harris
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Phenotypic abnormalities: terminology and classification.

Authors:  Johannes H M Merks; Clara D M van Karnebeek; Hubert N Caron; Raoul C M Hennekam
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Hepatocellular carcinoma in a child with familial Russell-Silver syndrome.

Authors:  D Chitayat; J M Friedman; L Anderson; J E Dimmick
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1988-12

Review 7.  Diagnostic criteria for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: suggestions of the European consortium 'care for CMMRD' (C4CMMRD).

Authors:  Katharina Wimmer; Christian P Kratz; Hans F A Vasen; Olivier Caron; Chrystelle Colas; Natacha Entz-Werle; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Yael Goldberg; Denisa Ilencikova; Martine Muleris; Alex Duval; Noémie Lavoine; Clara Ruiz-Ponte; Irene Slavc; Brigit Burkhardt; Laurence Brugieres
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  LEOPARD syndrome: clinical diagnosis in the first year of life.

Authors:  M Cristina Digilio; Anna Sarkozy; Andrea de Zorzi; Giuseppe Pacileo; Giuseppe Limongelli; Rita Mingarelli; Raffaele Calabrò; Bruno Marino; Bruno Dallapiccola
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 2.802

9.  Risk of benign tumours of nervous system, and of malignant neoplasms, in people with neurofibromatosis: population-based record-linkage study.

Authors:  O O Seminog; M J Goldacre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Diagnostic and pathogenetic role of café-au-lait macules in nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome.

Authors:  Giovanni Ponti; Aldo Tomasi; Lorenza Pastorino; Cristel Ruini; Carmelo Guarneri; Victor Desmond Mandel; Stefania Seidenari; Giovanni Pellacani
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.857

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric cancer risk in association with birth defects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kimberly J Johnson; Jong Min Lee; Kazi Ahsan; Hannah Padda; Qianxi Feng; Sonia Partap; Susan A Fowler; Todd E Druley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Treatment of Café-Au-Lait Spots Using Q-Switched Alexandrite Laser: Analysis of Clinical Characteristics of 471 Children in Mainland China.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Yan Chu; Zigang Xu; Yujuan Sun; Li Li; Xiaofeng Han; Chen Wang; Li Wei; Yuanxiang Liu; Lin Ma
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 3.  Challenges in the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) in young children facilitated by means of revised diagnostic criteria including genetic testing for pathogenic NF1 gene variants.

Authors:  Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki; David N Cooper
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Nonmalignant Features Associated with Inherited Colorectal Cancer Syndromes-Clues for Diagnosis.

Authors:  Diana Haimov; Sari Lieberman; Sergi Castellvi-Bel; Maartje Nielsen; Yael Goldberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 5.  Histological Patterns of Skin Lesions in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Panorama.

Authors:  Marine Cascarino; Stéphanie Leclerc-Mercier
Journal:  Dermatopathology (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-04

6.  Diagnostic difficulties and possibilities of NF1-like syndromes in childhood.

Authors:  Eva Pinti; Krisztina Nemeth; Krisztina Staub; Anna Lengyel; Gyorgy Fekete; Iren Haltrich
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.125

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.