| Literature DB >> 27223088 |
Peng Sun1,2, Fei Zhang1,2, Cui Chen3, Xiwen Bi1,2, Hang Yang1,2, Xin An1,2, Fenghua Wang1,2, Wenqi Jiang1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We propose a novel prognostic parameter for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)-hemoglobin/red cell distribution width (HB/RDW) ratio. Its clinical prognostic value and relationship with other clinicopathological characteristics were investigated in ESCC patients.Entities:
Keywords: esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); hemoglobin; prognosis; red cell distribution width (RDW); survival
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27223088 PMCID: PMC5173164 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9516
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (OS) according to the HB/RDW ratio
Univariate and multivariate analysis of OS in 362 ESCC patients
| Variable | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P value | HR | 95% CI | P value | HR | 95% CI | |||
| Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||||
| Male | Reference | |||||||
| Female | 0.396 | 0.863 | 0.614 | 1.213 | ||||
| ≤60 | Reference | |||||||
| >60 | 0.875 | 0.976 | 0.724 | 1.317 | ||||
| I-II | Reference | |||||||
| III | 0.241 | 1.216 | 0.877 | 1.687 | ||||
| Negative | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Positive | <0.001 | 2.596 | 1.918 | 3.516 | <0.001 | 2.219 | 1.612 | 3.055 |
| Tis-T2 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| T3-T4 | <0.001 | 2.413 | 1.611 | 3.614 | 0.020 | 1.677 | 1.084 | 2.596 |
| Upper | Reference | |||||||
| Middle | 0.898 | 0.968 | 0.590 | 1.589 | ||||
| Lower | 0.550 | 0.844 | 0.484 | 1.472 | ||||
| Surgery alone | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| Surgery+ adjuvant RT/CT | 0.008 | 1.577 | 1.127 | 2.207 | 0.665 | 1.081 | 0.759 | 1.540 |
| 0 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| 1-2 | 0.033 | 1.433 | 1.029 | 1.995 | 0.230 | 1.235 | 0.875 | 1.744 |
| Never | Reference | |||||||
| Ever | 0.341 | 1.164 | 0.852 | 1.590 | ||||
| ≤3.5 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| >3.5 | 0.044 | 1.353 | 1.008 | 1.817 | 0.982 | 1.004 | 0.736 | 1.369 |
| ≤3 | Reference | |||||||
| >3 | 0.693 | 0.932 | 0.657 | 1.321 | ||||
| ≤150 | Reference | |||||||
| >150 | 0.817 | 0.960 | 0.681 | 1.354 | ||||
| <10.3 | Reference | |||||||
| ≥10.3 | 0.067 | 0.493 | 0.231 | 1.051 | ||||
| <13.6 | Reference | |||||||
| ≥13.6 | 0.094 | 1.381 | 0.946 | 2.016 | ||||
| ≥0.989 | Reference | Reference | ||||||
| <0.989 | 0.004 | 1.589 | 1.156 | 2.185 | 0.035 | 1.416 | 1.024 | 1.958 |
Abbreviations: OS=overall survival; ESCC=esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; HB=hemoglobin; RDW=red cell distribution width; GPS=Glasgow prognostic score; NLR=neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR= platelet to lymphocyte ratio; HR=hazard ratio; CI=confidence interval; RT=radiotherapy; CT=chemotherapy.
p < 0.05
Baseline clinical features of 362 patients with ESCC
| Group | Total | % | HB/RDW | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <0.989 | % | ≥0.989 | % | ||||
| Male | 268 | 74.0 | 54 | 61.4 | 214 | 78.1 | 0.003 |
| Female | 94 | 26.0 | 34 | 38.6 | 60 | 21.9 | |
| ≤60 | 217 | 59.9 | 51 | 58.0 | 166 | 60.6 | 0.708 |
| >60 | 145 | 40.1 | 37 | 42.0 | 108 | 39.4 | |
| I-II | 270 | 74.6 | 69 | 78.4 | 201 | 73.4 | 0.339 |
| III | 92 | 25.4 | 19 | 21.6 | 73 | 26.6 | |
| Negative | 194 | 53.6 | 40 | 45.5 | 154 | 56.2 | 0.086 |
| Positive | 168 | 46.4 | 48 | 54.5 | 120 | 43.8 | |
| Tis-T2 | 95 | 26.2 | 15 | 17.0 | 80 | 29.2 | 0.026 |
| T3-T4 | 267 | 73.8 | 73 | 83.0 | 194 | 70.8 | |
| I-II | 203 | 56.1 | 39 | 44.3 | 164 | 59.9 | 0.013 |
| III | 159 | 43.9 | 49 | 55.7 | 110 | 40.1 | |
| Upper | 38 | 10.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 34 | 12.4 | 0.052 |
| Middle | 229 | 63.3 | 55 | 62.5 | 174 | 63.5 | |
| Lower | 95 | 26.2 | 29 | 33.0 | 66 | 24.1 | |
| 0 | 280 | 77.3 | 65 | 73.9 | 215 | 78.5 | 0.382 |
| 1-2 | 82 | 22.7 | 23 | 26.1 | 59 | 21.5 | |
| Never | 129 | 35.6 | 38 | 43.2 | 91 | 33.2 | 0.097 |
| Ever | 233 | 64.4 | 50 | 56.8 | 183 | 66.8 | |
| ≤3.5 | 186 | 51.4 | 37 | 42 | 149 | 54.4 | 0.050 |
| >3.5 | 176 | 48.6 | 51 | 58 | 125 | 45.6 | |
| Median | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 0.004 | |||
| Mean±SD | 2.9±4.0 | 3.9±6.9 | 2.5±2.3 | ||||
| Median | 117 | 126 | 113 | 0.001 | |||
| Mean±SD | 130±67 | 150±79 | 124±62 | ||||
| Median | 13.7 | 11.7 | 14.1 | <0.001 | |||
| Mean±SD | 13.5±1.6 | 11.6±1.5 | 14.1±1.1 | ||||
| Median | 12.4 | 13.7 | 12.2 | <0.001 | |||
| Mean±SD | 12.6±1.1 | 13.7±1.5 | 12.2±0.7 | ||||
| Surgery alone | 289 | 79.8 | 63 | 71.6 | 226 | 82.5 | 0.022 |
| Surgery+ adjuvant RT/CT | 73 | 20.2 | 25 | 28.4 | 48 | 17.5 | |
Abbreviations: ESCC=esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; HB=hemoglobin; RDW=red cell distribution width; GPS=Glasgow prognostic score; NLR=neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; PLR= platelet to lymphocyte ratio; SD=standard deviation; RT=radiotherapy; CT=chemotherapy
p < 0.05
Figure 2The HB/RDW ratio according to tumor depth A. and gender B. The HB/RDW ratio was significantly higher in male patients and patients with Tis/T1/T2 ESCC