Literature DB >> 27222697

Effect of Chewing Gum on Oral Mucositis in Children Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Study.

A Eghbali, B Taherkhanchi, B Bagheri, B Sadeghi Sedeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is an adverse effect of chemotherapy. Type of chemotherapy regimen is the most important factor causing mucositis. Oral mucositis is usually associated with transient decrease in saliva production. The goal was to study effects of gum consumption on oral mucositis in children undergoing chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND
METHOD: This randomized controlled trial was done in Amir Kabir Hospital, Arak, Iran. 130 children 5 to 15 years of age were studied. Control group was composed of 65 children who received mucotoxic drugs. Test group was made up of 65 patients received similar drugs in addition to sugar free gums. Patients consumed 6 pieces of gums per day for 15 days. A standardized follow up form and World Health Organization (WHO) grading system for oral mucositis were used for evaluation of patients during 15 days of treatment.
RESULTS: Severe oral mucositis occurred in 30 (46%) of 65 patients in the test group and in 26 of 65 (40%) patients in the control group. Difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Rate of mild to moderate mucoitis (grade 1 and 2) was significantly lower in patients who used gums (15 % vs. 35%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that stimulation of saliva flow by chewing gum could decrease mild to moderate inflammatory injuries of the oral mucosa during chemotherapy. However, it was not effective to subside severe mucositis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemotherapy; Children; Gum; Mucositis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27222697      PMCID: PMC4867166     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Ped Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 2008-8892


Introduction

Oral mucositis is one of the most common untoward effects of cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy (1). Oral mucositis is an inflammatory condition, which is usually severe and painful. Types of medication and patients’ factors are determining factors for the severity of the disease (2,3). Evidence from several lines of studies indicates that innate and adaptive immunity are involved in initiation and progression of mucositis. Pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1β and TNF-α are abundantly found in oral lesions related to cancer chemotherapy. These cytokines can worsen the inflammatory status by increasing the permeability of the oral tissues and causes further accumulation of immune cells and cytotoxic agents (4-6). In addition, it is suggested that cytotoxic agents have some direct effects on oral epithelium which can lead to damage of acinar ductal cells of the salivary glands and hyposalivation may happen (7). Naturally, saliva is composed of antimicrobial and mucosal protective compounds that are vital for the oral health (8,9). Therefore, any decrease in saliva can predispose the oral cavity to the damaging effects of cancer chemotherapy. During recent years, several guidelines have been applied to prevent mucositis (10,11). Currently, the most effective means of preventing mucositis is through good oral hygiene (12). It is thought that stimulation in salivary production may decrease the severity of mucositis. Chewing gum can stimulate the salivary production up to 10-fold (13). Importantly, sugar-free gums are inexpensive and available. The purpose of the present was to study effects of gum on oral mucositis in children undergoing chemotherapy. This study was implemented to find whether gum consumption could subside the severity of mucositis.

Materials and Method

This single center, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in Amir Kabir Hospital, Arak, Iran, between April 2014 and June 2015. The sample size was calculated with a type I error of 5%, a statistical power of 80%, and a standardized effect size of 0.65. A total of 130 children 5 to 15 years of age who were receiving same mucotoxic drugs were randomized 1 : 1 to 2 groups: control group and test group. Control group included 65 patients who were given a standard mouth rinse composed of nystatin,diphenhydramine, and aluminum Mgs, 3 times a day. Test group included 65 patients who were administered the mentioned mouth rinse and gum. Chewing gums were sugar-free (White®, Minoo, Tehran, Iran). Patients consumed 6 pieces per day for 15 days. Chewing lasted about 30 minutes. Each child participated for 1 chemotherapy course. The exclusion criteria were patients older than 15 years old or younger than 5 years old, patients were not on stomatotoxic agents, patients with diabetes, patients with cardiovascular diseases, patients suffered from mental disorders, and patients with oral lesions caused by any reason. Medications, sex, age, and previous medical history were obtained through questionnaire and medical records of the patients. The local Ethics Committee approved the study and informed consent was obtained from parents of participants. Evaluation of Patients During chemotherapy, physicians evaluated patients. Severity of mucositis, health of oral cavity and general status of the patients were adequately assessed and classified according to WHO scoring system (Table I). After termination of chemotherapy, routine evaluations were done every 3 days for a total of 15 days.
Table I

WHO scoring system of mucositis

Description Grade
No mucositis present 0
Irritation of oral mucosa, with pain; no overt ulceration 1
Sores evident in oral mucosa; patients still able to swallow solid food 2
Patient experience extreme sensitivity when swallowing solid food 3
Patient unable to swallow 4
Statistical analysis Data are reported as mean ± SD or numbers (percentage). Data distribution was checked by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Means were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Differences at the level of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0.

Results

Clinical characteristics Table II shows clinical characteristics of study subjects. There were no significant differences in demographics or clinicopathological features between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).
Table II

Clinical characteristics of study patients

Characteristic Control (N=65) Test (N=65)
Age (yr)8 ± 2.19 ± 2.7
Male39 (60)27 (41.5)
Malignancy
AML14 (21.5)19 (29.2)
ALL32 (49.2)27 (41.5)
T lymphoblastic leukemia10 (15.3)13 (20)
Osteosarcoma5 (7.6)3 (4.6)
Rhabdomyosarcoma4 (6.1)1 (1.5)
Ewing1 (1.5)2 (3)
Neutrophil count2921 ± 12542856± 1237

Data are shown in number, percentage (%) and mean ± SD

Effect of chewing gum As assessed by WHO scoring system, a significant reduction was seen in incidence of grade 1 mucositis, as compared to control group (44% vs 30%, P < 0.05; Fig. 1). In addition, incidence of grade 2 mucositis was lower in test group as compared to control group (20% vs 15%, Fig.1), however, this difference failed to reach at a significant level (P>0.05). In advanced grades (3 and 4), no positive effect of chewing gum was seen. As shown in Fig1, grade 3 mucositis was more frequent in test group.
Figure 1

Effect of gum consumption on different stages of oral mucositis.* P < 0.05

WHO scoring system of mucositis Clinical characteristics of study patients Data are shown in number, percentage (%) and mean ± SD Effect of gum consumption on different stages of oral mucositis.* P < 0.05

Discussion

This randomized and controlled study showed that gum consumption could decrease the severity of oral mucositis in children undergoing chemotherapy. Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis is very common and usually hard to control. Oral mucositis is often a hurdle to continue the schedule of treatment and can be a cause of failure in treatment. Such unexpected intervals in treatment of malignancies, may eventually lead to poor outcome of treatment (14). Thus, management of mucositis and other common side effects of cancer therapy are of great value. It is suggested to use drug combinations, which are less likely to cause mucositis especially in children who have concomitant dental or oral diseases (15). Poor oral hygiene is very important risk factor, which is usually linked to the severity of mucositis. It has been demonstrated that children who have healthier status of oral mucosa are more resistant to oral lesions of chemotherapy (15-17). The results of current study showed that gum consumption had no significant effect on advanced mucositis; grade 3 and 4. Importantly, in grade 3, patients who had used gum were more susceptible to mucositis. It is obscure that how gum could reduce the frequency of low-grade mucositis, grade 1 and 2. However, no significant difference was seen between two groups at grade 4. It may be partially explained by individual differences in patients and drugs. As noted earlier, it is very difficult to control advanced mucositis. Cumulative evidence has shown that stimulation of salivary flow can reduce the severity of mucositis (17,18). Saliva is composed of different compounds, which can protect the mucosa. Pathophysiologically, saliva is one of mechanisms involved in preservation of oral mucosal integrity (13). Somatotoxic drugs are able to directly affect the fundamental structures of oral mucosa; hence, salivary stimulation is not strong enough and for sure not the only defensive mechanism against injuries of these drugs (19,20). Adjustment of oral PH by saliva can be new field of research. It should be further investigated that which PH has maximal efficacy against injuries of drugs. Taken together, it is suggested that all children undergoing chemotherapy use chewing gum for reduction of oral mucositis, especially low grade mucositis. More studies are needed to gain fuller understanding about the other mechanism involved in progression of oral mucositis. New targets will be new area of research.

Conclusion

This trial shows that using chewing gum for 15 days is effective to prevent moderate mucositis in children, albeit it has no significant effects on advanced mucositis.
  17 in total

1.  Risk factors for chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis: dental appliances, oral hygiene, previous oral lesions, and history of smoking.

Authors:  M J Dodd; C Miaskowski; G H Shiba; S L Dibble; D Greenspan; L MacPhail; S M Paul; P Larson
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 2.  Risk factors for ulcerative oral mucositis in cancer patients: unanswered questions.

Authors:  Andrei Barasch; Douglas E Peterson
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Effects of xylitol chewing gum on salivary flow rate, pH, buffering capacity and presence of Streptococcus mutans in saliva.

Authors:  M Ribelles Llop; F Guinot Jimeno; R Mayné Acién; L J Bellet Dalmau
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Management of oral and gastrointestinal mucositis: ESMO clinical recommendations.

Authors:  D E Peterson; R-J Bensadoun; F Roila
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  The role of basic oral care and good clinical practice principles in the management of oral mucositis.

Authors:  Deborah B McGuire; Maria Elvira P Correa; Judith Johnson; Patricia Wienandts
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in children with cancer.

Authors:  Misty M Miller; David V Donald; Tracy M Hagemann
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-10

7.  Oral cavity cancers at a young age: analysis of patient, tumor and treatment characteristics in Chiang Mai University Hospital.

Authors:  Imjai Chitapanarux; Vicharn Lorvidhaya; Pichit Sittitrai; Thienchai Pattarasakulchai; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Pornpoch Sriuthaisiriwong; Pimkhuan Kamnerdsupaphon; Vimol Sukthomya
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Sugar substitutes, chewing gum and dental caries--a review.

Authors:  W M Edgar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1998-01-10       Impact factor: 1.626

9.  Updated clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of mucositis.

Authors:  Dorothy M Keefe; Mark M Schubert; Linda S Elting; Stephen T Sonis; Joel B Epstein; Judith E Raber-Durlacher; Cesar A Migliorati; Deborah B McGuire; Ronald D Hutchins; Douglas E Peterson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Oral mucositis induced by anticancer treatments: physiopathology and treatments.

Authors:  D'Hondt Lionel; Lonchay Christophe; André Marc; Canon Jean-Luc
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  2 in total

1.  Systematic review of natural and miscellaneous agents, for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients and clinical practice guidelines - part 2: honey, herbal compounds, saliva stimulants, probiotics, and miscellaneous agents.

Authors:  Noam Yarom; Allan Hovan; Paolo Bossi; Anura Ariyawardana; Siri Beier Jensen; Margherita Gobbo; Hanan Saca-Hazboun; Abhishek Kandwal; Alessandra Majorana; Giulia Ottaviani; Monica Pentenero; Narmin Mohammed Nasr; Tanya Rouleau; Anna Skripnik Lucas; Nathaniel Simon Treister; Eyal Zur; Vinisha Ranna; Anusha Vaddi; Andrei Barasch; Rajesh V Lalla; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Sharon Elad
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis: sub-analysis of current interventions for the management of oral mucositis in pediatric cancer patients.

Authors:  Wanessa Miranda-Silva; Wagner Gomes-Silva; Yehuda Zadik; Noam Yarom; Abdul Rahman Al-Azri; Catherine H L Hong; Anura Ariyawardana; Deborah P Saunders; M Elvira Correa; Praveen R Arany; Joanne Bowen; Karis Kin Fong Cheng; Wim J E Tissing; Paolo Bossi; Sharon Elad
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.603

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.