Literature DB >> 27222554

Identifying Barriers to Appropriate Use of Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: Policy Lab Results.

Jennifer K Rubin1, Saba Hinrichs-Krapels2, Rachel Hesketh1, Adam Martin3, William H Herman4, Francesco Rubino5.   

Abstract

Despite increasing recognition of the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bariatric/metabolic surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, few patients who may be appropriate candidates and may benefit from this type of surgery avail themselves of this treatment option. To identify conceptual and practical barriers to appropriate use of surgical procedures, a Policy Lab was hosted at the 3rd World Congress on Interventional Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes on 29 September 2015. Twenty-six stakeholders participated in the Policy Lab, including academics, clinicians, policy-makers, industry leaders, and patient representatives. Participants were provided with a summary of available evidence about the cost-effectiveness of bariatric/metabolic surgery and the costs of increasing the use of bariatric/metabolic surgery, using U.K. and U.S. scenarios as examples of distinct health care systems. There was widespread agreement among this group of stakeholders that bariatric/metabolic surgery is a legitimate and cost-effective approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes in obese patients. The following four building blocks were identified to facilitate policy changes: 1) communicating the scale of the costs and harms associated with rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes; 2) properly articulating the role of bariatric/metabolic surgery for certain population groups; 3) identifying new funding sources for bariatric/metabolic surgery; and 4) incorporating bariatric/metabolic surgery into the appropriate clinical pathways. Although more research is needed to identify specific clinical scenarios for the prioritization of bariatric/metabolic surgery, the case appears to be strong enough to engage relevant policy-makers and practitioners in a concerted discussion of how to better use metabolic surgical resources in conjunction with other interventions in good diabetes practice.
© 2016 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27222554      PMCID: PMC5864132          DOI: 10.2337/dc15-2781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  24 in total

1.  IDF's view of bariatric surgery in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Paul Zimmet; K George M M Alberti; Francesco Rubino; John B Dixon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Current prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in adults and children in the UK.

Authors:  N Holman; B Young; R Gadsby
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 3.  Gap Between Evidence and Patient Access: Policy Implications for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment of Obesity and its Complications.

Authors:  Amarpreet S Chawla; Chia-Wen Hsiao; Martha C Romney; Ricardo Cohen; Francesco Rubino; Philip Schauer; Pierre Cremieux
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Treatment of mild to moderate obesity with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding or an intensive medical program: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Paul E O'Brien; John B Dixon; Cheryl Laurie; Stewart Skinner; Joe Proietto; John McNeil; Boyd Strauss; Sharon Marks; Linda Schachter; Leon Chapman; Margaret Anderson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Primary care physicians' attitudes about obesity and its treatment.

Authors:  Gary D Foster; Thomas A Wadden; Angela P Makris; Duncan Davidson; Rebecca Swain Sanderson; David B Allison; Amy Kessler
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2003-10

Review 6.  Weight loss surgery for mild to moderate obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Authors:  Joanna Picot; Jeremy Jones; Jill L Colquitt; Emma Loveman; Andrew J Clegg
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Incidences of obesity and extreme obesity among US adults: findings from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Liping Pan; David S Freedman; Cathleen Gillespie; Sohyun Park; Bettylou Sherry
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2011-10-17

8.  Clinical Indications, Utilization, and Funding of Bariatric Surgery in Europe.

Authors:  Oleg Borisenko; Zeynep Colpan; Bruno Dillemans; Peter Funch-Jensen; Jan Hedenbro; Ahmed R Ahmed
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Cost-effectiveness of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: modeled lifetime analysis.

Authors:  Catherine L Keating; John B Dixon; Marjory L Moodie; Anna Peeters; Liliana Bulfone; Dianna J Maglianno; Paul E O'Brien
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 17.152

10.  The relationship of body mass index to diabetes mellitus, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: comparison of data from two national surveys.

Authors:  H E Bays; R H Chapman; S Grandy
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.503

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reconciliation of Type 2 Diabetes Remission Rates in Studies of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Deanna J M Isaman; Amy E Rothberg; William H Herman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Cost-effectiveness of metabolic surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity: a systematic review of economic evaluations.

Authors:  Karen Jordan; Christopher G Fawsitt; Paul G Carty; Barbara Clyne; Conor Teljeur; Patricia Harrington; Mairin Ryan
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-07-22

3.  Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check in the first 8 years: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adam Martin; Catherine L Saunders; Emma Harte; Simon J Griffin; Calum MacLure; Jonathan Mant; Catherine Meads; Fiona M Walter; Juliet A Usher-Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Evaluation and Management of Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Silva Arslanian; Fida Bacha; Margaret Grey; Marsha D Marcus; Neil H White; Philip Zeitler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Metabolic Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes: Changing the Landscape of Diabetes Care.

Authors:  William T Cefalu; Francesco Rubino; David E Cummings
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.