Literature DB >> 27222454

How do patients' values influence heart failure self-care decision-making?: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Mehri Karimi1, Alexander M Clark2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Values are central to ethical and effective nursing and health care. However, in relation to heart failure, an extremely common and burdensome syndrome, the role that patients' values have in influencing self-care is poorly understood.
METHODS: A mixed methods systematic review was conducted using a critical meta-narrative synthesis approach to synthesizing qualitative and qualitized data. Nine databases were searched (14 March 2014). To be included in the review, studies had to contain data on heart failure patients' values and self-care behaviors, include adults aged ≥18 years with symptomatic heart failure, and be published ≥2000 as full articles or theses. Study quality was assessed using a mixed-methods appraisal tool.
FINDINGS: Of 6467 citations identified, 54 studies were included (30 qualitative, 8 mixed methods, and 16 quantitative; 6045 patients, 38 lay caregivers, and 96 health care professionals). The synthesis identified multiple bi-directional interactions between heart failure, patients' values, and self-care. Patients are motivated by self-related and other-related values. Self-related values are tied directly to intimate personal feelings (self-direction, pleasure, and being healthy) or related to individuals' life circumstances (maintaining a healthy lifestyle and financial balance). Other-related values, which are fundamentally socially-based, are related to benefits received from society (social recognition and socialization) and social obligations (responsibility, observing traditions, and obedience). For each decision, several values are involved; some are incompatible and some are in conflict. Patients make their self-care decision based on the values they prioritize and those that are blocked.
CONCLUSION: Values are integral to how patients approach and undertake HF self-care. These values both affect and respond to this self-care and the severity of HF symptoms. Values extend to those relating to the self and others and incorporate a range of personal, life, and social dimensions. Values cannot be assumed to be fixed, normative or similar to those held by nurses and other health professionals. Future interventions to improve HF self-care must address and respond to the complexity of patients' values and how they influence patient behavior in undertaking heart failure self-care.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision-making; Heart failure; Mixed-methods; Patient-centered care; Self-care; Values

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27222454     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  9 in total

1.  Psychometric Testing of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index.

Authors:  Barbara Riegel; Claudio Barbaranelli; Beverly Carlson; Kristen A Sethares; Marguerite Daus; Debra K Moser; Jennifer Miller; Onome Henry Osokpo; Solim Lee; Stacey Brown; Ercole Vellone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Self-care perception and behaviour in patients with heart failure: A qualitative and quantitative study.

Authors:  Natasa Sedlar; Mitja Lainscak; Jerneja Farkas
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-03-15

Review 3.  Factors Related to Self-Care in Heart Failure Patients According to the Middle-Range Theory of Self-Care of Chronic Illness: a Literature Update.

Authors:  Tiny Jaarsma; Jan Cameron; Barbara Riegel; Anna Stromberg
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-04

4.  Living with advanced heart failure: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Caterina Checa; Laura Medina-Perucha; Miguel-Ángel Muñoz; José María Verdú-Rotellar; Anna Berenguera
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Values and preferences towards medical cannabis among people living with chronic pain: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Linan Zeng; Lyubov Lytvyn; Xiaoqin Wang; Natasha Kithulegoda; Silvana Agterberg; Yaad Shergill; Meisam Abdar Esfahani; Anja Fog Heen; Thomas Agoritsas; Gordon H Guyatt; Jason W Busse
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Salt Consumption and Blood Pressure in Rural Hypertensive Participants: A Community Filed Trial.

Authors:  Farzaneh Noroozi; Mohammad Fararouei; Javad Kojuri; Leila Ghahremani; Kaveh Ghodrati
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2022-03-30

Review 7.  Heart Failure Care: Testing Dyadic Dynamics Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM)-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Izabella Uchmanowicz; Kenneth M Faulkner; Ercole Vellone; Agnieszka Siennicka; Remigiusz Szczepanowski; Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Experiences and attitudes about physical activity and exercise in patients with chronic pain: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Linn Karlsson; Björn Gerdle; Esa-Pekka Takala; Gerhard Andersson; Britt Larsson
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 9.  The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews.

Authors:  Ena Niño de Guzmán Quispe; Laura Martínez García; Carola Orrego Villagrán; Monique Heijmans; Rosa Sunol; David Fraile-Navarro; Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione; Lyudmil Ninov; Karla Salas-Gama; Andrés Viteri García; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.883

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.