Literature DB >> 27222169

Predictions penetrate perception: Converging insights from brain, behaviour and disorder.

Claire O'Callaghan1, Kestutis Kveraga2, James M Shine3, Reginald B Adams4, Moshe Bar5.   

Abstract

It is argued that during ongoing visual perception, the brain is generating top-down predictions to facilitate, guide and constrain the processing of incoming sensory input. Here we demonstrate that these predictions are drawn from a diverse range of cognitive processes, in order to generate the richest and most informative prediction signals. This is consistent with a central role for cognitive penetrability in visual perception. We review behavioural and mechanistic evidence that indicate a wide spectrum of domains-including object recognition, contextual associations, cognitive biases and affective state-that can directly influence visual perception. We combine these insights from the healthy brain with novel observations from neuropsychiatric disorders involving visual hallucinations, which highlight the consequences of imbalance between top-down signals and incoming sensory information. Together, these lines of evidence converge to indicate that predictive penetration, be it cognitive, social or emotional, should be considered a fundamental framework that supports visual perception.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive penetration; Context; Object recognition; Orbitofrontal cortex; Parahippocampal cortex; Prediction; Top-down; Visual hallucinations; Visual perception

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27222169      PMCID: PMC5764074          DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  145 in total

1.  Cortical mechanisms specific to explicit visual object recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; R B Tootell; D L Schacter; D N Greve; B Fischl; J D Mendola; B R Rosen; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Thalamic relay functions and their role in corticocortical communication: generalizations from the visual system.

Authors:  R W Guillery; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-17       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition.

Authors:  M Bar; K S Kassam; A S Ghuman; J Boshyan; A M Schmid; A M Schmidt; A M Dale; M S Hämäläinen; K Marinkovic; D L Schacter; B R Rosen; E Halgren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sensory and premotor connections of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  S T Carmichael; J L Price
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1995-12-25       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 5.  Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.

Authors:  Andy Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 6.  Corticocortical connections in the visual system: structure and function.

Authors:  P A Salin; J Bullier
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Top-down modulation of lateral interactions in visual cortex.

Authors:  Nirmala Ramalingam; Justin N J McManus; Wu Li; Charles D Gilbert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The default mode network is disrupted in Parkinson's disease with visual hallucinations.

Authors:  Nailin Yao; Richard Shek-Kwan Chang; Charlton Cheung; Shirley Pang; Kui Kai Lau; John Suckling; James B Rowe; Kevin Yu; Henry Ka-Fung Mak; Siew-Eng Chua; Shu Leong Ho; Grainne M McAlonan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  25 in total

1.  The neural representation of facial-emotion categories reflects conceptual structure.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Brooks; Junichi Chikazoe; Norihiro Sadato; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Conceptual knowledge predicts the representational structure of facial emotion perception.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Brooks; Jonathan B Freeman
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-07-23

Review 3.  Visuoperceptive Impairments in Severe Alcohol Use Disorder: A Critical Review of Behavioral Studies.

Authors:  Coralie Creupelandt; Pierre Maurage; Fabien DˈHondt
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 4.  Do psychedelics change beliefs?

Authors:  H T McGovern; P Leptourgos; B T Hutchinson; P R Corlett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hutchinson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-04-16

6.  Spatial and feature-based attention to expressive faces.

Authors:  Kestutis Kveraga; David De Vito; Cody Cushing; Hee Yeon Im; Daniel N Albohn; Reginald B Adams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  The neural representational geometry of social perception.

Authors:  Jonathan B Freeman; Ryan M Stolier; Jeffrey A Brooks; Benjamin S Stillerman
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-10-09

8.  Functional and structural brain network correlates of visual hallucinations in Lewy body dementia.

Authors:  Ramtin Mehraram; Luis R Peraza; Nicholas R E Murphy; Ruth A Cromarty; Sara Graziadio; John T O'Brien; Alison Killen; Sean J Colloby; Michael Firbank; Li Su; Daniel Collerton; John Paul Taylor; Marcus Kaiser
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 15.255

9.  Neural coding of prior expectations in hierarchical intention inference.

Authors:  Valerian Chambon; Philippe Domenech; Pierre O Jacquet; Guillaume Barbalat; Sophie Bouton; Elisabeth Pacherie; Etienne Koechlin; Chlöé Farrer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

Authors:  Saga L Svensson; Marius Golubickis; Hollie Maclean; Johanna K Falbén; Linn M Persson; Dimitra Tsamadi; Siobhan Caughey; Arash Sahraie; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.