Literature DB >> 27221986

A social Bayesian brain: How social knowledge can shape visual perception.

Marte Otten1, Anil K Seth2, Yair Pinto3.   

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that social contextual factors such as desires and goals, affective states and stereotypes can shape early perceptual processes. We suggest that a generative Bayesian approach towards perception provides a powerful theoretical framework to accommodate how such high-level social factors can influence low-level perceptual processes in their earliest stages. We review experimental findings that show how social factors shape the perception and evaluation of people, behaviour, and socially relevant objects or information. Subsequently, we summarize the generative view of perception within the 'Bayesian brain', and show how such a framework can account for the pervasive effects of top-down social knowledge on social cognition. Finally, we sketch the theoretical and experimental implications of social predictive perception, indicating new directions for research on the effects and neurocognitive underpinnings of social cognition.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian brain; Cognition; Expectations; Perception; Predictive coding; Social biases; Social cognition; Stereotypes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27221986     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  14 in total

1.  Words are a context for mental inference.

Authors:  Nicole Betz; Katie Hoemann; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2019-01-10

2.  Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts.

Authors:  Igor Areh; Fanny Verkampt; Alfred Allan
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2021-05-26

3.  Surprising Threats Accelerate Conscious Perception.

Authors:  Jessica McFadyen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jason B Mattingley; Marta I Garrido
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Confidence in uncertainty: Error cost and commitment in early speech hypotheses.

Authors:  Sebastian Loth; Katharina Jettka; Manuel Giuliani; Stefan Kopp; Jan P de Ruiter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cues to intention bias action perception toward the most efficient trajectory.

Authors:  Katrina L McDonough; Matthew Hudson; Patric Bach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Predictive context biases binocular rivalry in children and adults with no positive relation to two measures of social cognition.

Authors:  Christian Valuch; Louisa Kulke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  They're watching you: the impact of social evaluation and anxiety on threat-related perceptual decision-making.

Authors:  Yvette Karvay; Gabriella Imbriano; Jingwen Jin; Aprajita Mohanty; Johanna M Jarcho
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-18

8.  More or less of me and you: self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization.

Authors:  Saga L Svensson; Marius Golubickis; Hollie Maclean; Johanna K Falbén; Linn M Persson; Dimitra Tsamadi; Siobhan Caughey; Arash Sahraie; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-29

9.  Integrating prediction errors at two time scales permits rapid recalibration of speech sound categories.

Authors:  Itsaso Olasagasti; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  It's not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritisation.

Authors:  Johanna K Falbén; Marius Golubickis; Darja Wischerath; Dimitra Tsamadi; Linn M Persson; Siobhan Caughey; Saga L Svensson; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.