Literature DB >> 27221789

A harmonization effort for acceptable daily exposure derivation - Considerations for application of adjustment factors.

Robert G Sussman1, Bruce D Naumann2, Thomas Pfister3, Claudia Sehner4, Christopher Seaman5, Patricia A Weideman6.   

Abstract

Acceptable daily exposures (ADEs) are established to determine the quantity of one drug substance that can contaminate another drug product without causing harm to the patient. An important part in setting an ADE for a drug substance, after identification of the unwanted critical effect(s) of the compound (see Bercu et al., 2016, this issue), is the determination of an appropriate overall margin of safety that is need to be maintained below the dose causing a certain critical effect (i.e., the point of departure or PoD). The overall margin of safety used to protect the general patient population from critical effects is derived as the product (i.e., composite adjustment factor) of various individual factors that account for variability and uncertainty in extrapolating from the PoD to an ADE. These factors address the considerations of interindividual variability, interspecies extrapolation, LOAEL-to-NOAEL extrapolation, exposure duration adjustment, effect severity, and database completeness. The factors are considered individually, but are not necessarily independent and their interdependence should be identified, with subsequent adjustment to the composite factor, as appropriate. It is important to identify all sources of variability and uncertainty pertinent to the derivation of the ADE and ensure each is considered in the assessment, at least by one of the adjustment factors. This manuscript highlights the basis for and selection of factors that address variability and uncertainty as used in the guidance documents on setting ADEs or other related health-based limits.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptable daily exposure (ADE); Adjustment factor (AF); Extrapolation; Hazard assessment; Interindividual variability; Interspecies extrapolation; Permitted daily exposure (PDE); Quantitative risk assessment; Safety factors (SF); Uncertainty factors (UF)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27221789     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

Review 1.  Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Genotoxic Substances in the Pharmaceutical Industry.

Authors:  Ester Lovsin Barle; Gian Christian Winkler; Susanne Glowienke; Azeddine Elhajouji; Jana Nunic; Hans-Joerg Martus
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Filling data gap for nicotinic acid, nicotinate esters and nicotinamide for the determination of permitted daily exposure by a category approach.

Authors:  Mohammad Charehsaz; Gulcin Tugcu; Ahmet Aydin
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2020-11-05

3.  Derivation of a no-significant-risk-level for tetrabromobisphenol A based on a threshold non-mutagenic cancer mode of action.

Authors:  Alison M Pecquet; Jeanelle M Martinez; Melissa Vincent; Neeraja Erraguntla; Michael Dourson
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.446

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.