Marilyn S Nanney1, Katherine Y Grannon1, Colin Cureton2, Courtney Hoolihan1, Mark Janowiec1, Qi Wang3, Cael Warren2, Robert P King2. 1. 1Department of Family Medicine & Community Health,Program in Health Disparities Research,University of Minnesota,717 Delaware Street SE,Minneapolis,MN 55414,USA. 2. 2Department of Applied Economics,University of Minnesota,St Paul,MN,USA. 3. 3Clinical and Translational Science Institute,Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of applying the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) to the hunger relief setting, specifically by assessing the nutritional quality of foods ordered by food shelves (front-line food provider) from food banks (warehouse of foods). DESIGN: This Healthy FOOD (Feedback On Ordering Decisions) observational study used electronic invoices detailing orders made by 269 food shelves in 2013 and analysed in 2015 from two large Minnesota, USA food banks to generate HEI-2010 scores. Initial development and processing procedures are described. RESULTS: The average total HEI-2010 score for the 269 food shelves was 62·7 out of 100 with a range from 28 to 82. Mean component scores for total protein foods, total vegetables, fatty acids, and seafood and plant proteins were the highest. Mean component score for whole grains was the lowest followed by dairy, total fruits, refined grains and sodium. Food shelves located in micropolitan areas and the largest food shelves had the highest HEI-2010 scores. Town/rural and smaller food shelves had the lowest scores. Monthly and seasonal differences in scores were detected. Limitations to this approach are identified. CONCLUSIONS: Calculating HEI-2010 for food shelves using electronic invoice data is novel and feasible, albeit with limitations. HEI-2010 scores for 2013 identify room for improvement in nearly all food shelves, especially the smallest agencies. The utility of providing HEI-2010 scores to decision makers in the hunger relief setting is an issue requiring urgent study.
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the feasibility of applying the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010) to the hunger relief setting, specifically by assessing the nutritional quality of foods ordered by food shelves (front-line food provider) from food banks (warehouse of foods). DESIGN: This Healthy FOOD (Feedback On Ordering Decisions) observational study used electronic invoices detailing orders made by 269 food shelves in 2013 and analysed in 2015 from two large Minnesota, USA food banks to generate HEI-2010 scores. Initial development and processing procedures are described. RESULTS: The average total HEI-2010 score for the 269 food shelves was 62·7 out of 100 with a range from 28 to 82. Mean component scores for total protein foods, total vegetables, fatty acids, and seafood and plant proteins were the highest. Mean component score for whole grains was the lowest followed by dairy, total fruits, refined grains and sodium. Food shelves located in micropolitan areas and the largest food shelves had the highest HEI-2010 scores. Town/rural and smaller food shelves had the lowest scores. Monthly and seasonal differences in scores were detected. Limitations to this approach are identified. CONCLUSIONS: Calculating HEI-2010 for food shelves using electronic invoice data is novel and feasible, albeit with limitations. HEI-2010 scores for 2013 identify room for improvement in nearly all food shelves, especially the smallest agencies. The utility of providing HEI-2010 scores to decision makers in the hunger relief setting is an issue requiring urgent study.
Authors: Alexander D Bryan; Zoë A Ginsburg; Ellen B Rubinstein; Hilary J Frankel; Andrew R Maroko; Clyde B Schechter; Kristen Cooksey Stowers; Sean C Lucan Journal: J Community Health Date: 2019-04
Authors: Kyeezu Kim; Yinan Zheng; Brian T Joyce; Hongmei Jiang; Philip Greenland; David R Jacobs; Kai Zhang; Lei Liu; Norrina B Allen; John T Wilkins; Sarah N Forrester; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Lifang Hou Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 7.259
Authors: Jill Reedy; Jennifer L Lerman; Susan M Krebs-Smith; Sharon I Kirkpatrick; TusaRebecca E Pannucci; Magdalena M Wilson; Amy F Subar; Lisa L Kahle; Janet A Tooze Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Breanne N Wright; Regan L Bailey; Bruce A Craig; Richard D Mattes; Lacey McCormack; Suzanne Stluka; Lisa Franzen-Castle; Becky Henne; Donna Mehrle; Dan Remley; Heather A Eicher-Miller Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-05-09 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Emilee L Quinn; Kate Ortiz; Laura Titzer; Barb Houston-Shimizu; Jessica Jones-Smith Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-15 Impact factor: 3.390