Pooja Saini1, Khatidja Chantler2, David While3, Navneet Kapur3. 1. Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, pooja.saini@liverpool.ac.uk. 2. School of Social Work, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK and. 3. Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester and Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust, Lancashire, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patient suicide can be a devastating event for some general practitioners (GPs). Few guidelines exist to aid or support GPs in the aftermath of patient suicide. AIM: To explore GPs views on how they are affected by a patient suicide and the formal support available to them following a patient suicide. DESIGN: Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. SETTING: General practices in the northwest of England. METHODS: About 198 semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a retrospective study. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using descriptive statistics and a framework thematic approach. RESULTS: GPs were aged between 31 and 67 years, 144 (73%) were male and the number of years in practice varied between 8 and 40 years (median = 24 years). GPs were based at 133 (67%) urban and 65 (33%) rural practices, 30 (15%) were single-handed GP practices and 168 (85%) practices had two or more GPs. About 131 (66%) GPs reported being affected by patient suicide through feelings of grief, guilt and self-scrutiny. A greater number of years in practice may have been protective against these effects. About 54 (27%) GPs reported having mostly 'informal' support from peers or colleagues and support was less available to younger and single handed GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the majority of GPs are affected by patient suicide and most seek informal support from their peers and colleagues. Although many indicated that informal support systems were adequate and provided a protective environment, procedures should be developed to ensure the availability of guidelines for those who may require formal support.
BACKGROUND:Patient suicide can be a devastating event for some general practitioners (GPs). Few guidelines exist to aid or support GPs in the aftermath of patient suicide. AIM: To explore GPs views on how they are affected by a patient suicide and the formal support available to them following a patient suicide. DESIGN: Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. SETTING: General practices in the northwest of England. METHODS: About 198 semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a retrospective study. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using descriptive statistics and a framework thematic approach. RESULTS: GPs were aged between 31 and 67 years, 144 (73%) were male and the number of years in practice varied between 8 and 40 years (median = 24 years). GPs were based at 133 (67%) urban and 65 (33%) rural practices, 30 (15%) were single-handed GP practices and 168 (85%) practices had two or more GPs. About 131 (66%) GPs reported being affected by patient suicide through feelings of grief, guilt and self-scrutiny. A greater number of years in practice may have been protective against these effects. About 54 (27%) GPs reported having mostly 'informal' support from peers or colleagues and support was less available to younger and single handed GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the majority of GPs are affected by patient suicide and most seek informal support from their peers and colleagues. Although many indicated that informal support systems were adequate and provided a protective environment, procedures should be developed to ensure the availability of guidelines for those who may require formal support.
Authors: Andrea L Murphy; Randa Ataya; Dani Himmelman; Claire O'Reilly; Alan Rosen; Luis Salvador-Carulla; Ruth Martin-Misener; Fred Burge; Stanley Kutcher; David M Gardner Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2018-06-23 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Kadri Suija; Liis Rooväli; Merli Aksen; Heti Pisarev; Anneli Uusküla; Raul-Allan Kiivet Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 1.792
Authors: Hilary Causer; Johanna Spiers; Nikolaos Efstathiou; Stephanie Aston; Carolyn A Chew-Graham; Anya Gopfert; Kathryn Grayling; Jill Maben; Maria van Hove; Ruth Riley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-14 Impact factor: 4.614