Literature DB >> 27221573

Lymph Node Density in Node-Positive Laryngeal Carcinoma: Analysis of Prognostic Value for Survival.

Abdulkadir Imre1, Ercan Pinar2, Elif Dincer2, Yılmaz Ozkul2, Hale Aslan2, Murat Songu2, Bekir Tatar2, Irem Onur3, Sedat Ozturkcan2, Ibrahim Aladag2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the value of lymph node density (LND) as a predictor of survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and positive neck node (pN+) after laryngectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with chart review.
SETTING: Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 289 patients with newly diagnosed primary laryngeal carcinomas who underwent partial or total laryngectomy and combined neck dissection at a tertiary referral center between June 2006 and December 2014. Patients with pN+ laryngeal SCC (n = 101) were included in the study. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were used to evaluate the prognostic significance of LND.
RESULTS: In 101 patients with pN+ laryngeal SCC, LND ≥0.09 and number of metastatic lymph nodes >4 were significantly associated with OS and DFS but not the overall tumor, node, and metastasis stage. Forward stepwise Cox regression analysis revealed that LND ≥0.09 was the only independent predictor of both DFS and OS. Furthermore, the odds ratio of LND ≥0.09 was 10 times higher in patients with regional recurrence when compared patients without regional recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: LND was the only independent prognostic predictor of OS and DFS in patients with pN+ laryngeal SCC. Moreover, patients with LND ≥0.09 were significantly associated with high risk of regional recurrence. Thus, patients with LND ≥0.09 are at high risk of regional recurrence and death and may be considered for adjuvant chemoradiation. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease free survival; laryngeal carcinoma; lymph node density; lymph node metastasis; overall survival; prognostic factors

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27221573     DOI: 10.1177/0194599816652371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  6 in total

1.  Lymph node density as a predictive factor for worse outcomes in laryngeal cancer.

Authors:  Sílvia Petrarolha; Rogério Dedivitis; Leandro Matos; Daniel Ramos; Marco Kulcsar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Results of a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving neck dissection in clinically node-negative squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Manoj Pandey; Senniappan Karthikeyan; Deepika Joshi; Mohan Kumar; Mridula Shukla
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arikin Abdeyrim; Shizhi He; Yang Zhang; Gulbostan Mamtali; Aibadla Asla; Mirkamil Yusup; Jiang Liu
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-29

4.  Development of comprehensive nomograms for evaluating overall and cancer-specific survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with neck dissection.

Authors:  Xiao Shi; Wei-Ping Hu; Qing-Hai Ji
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-02

5.  Extranodal Extension as an Independent Prognostic factor in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Authors:  Zhihai Wang; Quan Zeng; Yanshi Li; Tao Lu; Chuan Liu; Guohua Hu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prognostic importance of harvested lymph node number, metastatic lymph node number, and lymph node ratio in surgically managed laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Abakay; Selçuk Güneş; Filiz Gülüstan
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.