| Literature DB >> 27221388 |
Giovanni Cammaroto1, Filippo Montevecchi2, Giovanni D'Agostino2, Ermelinda Zeccardo2, Chiara Bellini2, Bruno Galletti3, Medhat Shams4, Hesham Negm5, Claudio Vicini2.
Abstract
Coblation tongue surgery and Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) proved to be the most published therapeutical options for the treatment of patients affected by obstructive sleep apneas (OSAHS). A systematic review of the literature and an analysis of the data are presented. The mean rates of failure were 34.4 and 38.5 %, respectively in TORS and Coblation groups. Complications occurred in 21.3 % of the patients treated with TORS and in 8.4 % of the patients treated with Coblation surgery. TORS seems to give slightly better results, allowing a wider surgical view and a measurable, more consistent removal of lingual tissue. However, the higher rate of minor complication and the significant costs of TORS must also be considered. Moreover, both technologies may be applied to a wide range of surgical techniques, each of them with different effectiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Coblation; OSAHS; Technology; Tongue base; Trans oral robotic surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27221388 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4112-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0937-4477 Impact factor: 2.503